Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
But, aren't OTHER drugs/medications (other than vaccines) double blind tested, using actual placebos, in order to verify those OTHER drugs' effectiveness? And such double blind studies using placebo, are considered ethical, aren't they?
In healthy normal people the double blind drug studies are to show the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects. Drugs such as antimicrobials are not tested on humans by exposing them to a pathogen. The antimicrobial drug's effectiveness is tested invitro in the lab not on a human. So no, what you are implying is not ethical.
They don't expose subjects to group A strep to test the effectiveness of a new antibiotic. The studies are to check PK (onset, duration, peak, trough, affect of food) are done double blind in healthy normal. The side effects profile and PD (affect on blood chemistry, etc) are checked at the same time
The testing you are talking about are done via metanalysis. Your understanding of clinical pharmacological research is skewed and off topic to the subject at hand
In the world of fairy tales and pixy dust, no one has anything to gain.Everything is free.
It amazes me the amount of trust in our government. And even more comical that people think the billions spent by lobbyist is ethical. (But then again people don't think for themselves)
The land of fairy tales and pixy dust seems like the home of conspiracy theorists not science.
Science? Pharma? Oh that's a good one. Let's try this again. Did you know that all medical research is now being done by Big Pharma and they are dictating medical practice? They have successfully invaded medical schools and are in control of what the students are taught. Have you ever noticed that conventional medicine only offers two things and that everyone else is a quack? Pharma has no interest in wellness. That's why there are only treatments but no cure.
More Proof Flu Shots Don't Work
Here is a very interesting line from the article. They lobbied on behalf of, who was that?: Despite their ineffectiveness, public health and hospital officials have also lobbied hard on behalf of pharmaceutical companies to increase the percentage of health-care workers who get vaccinated, with a handful of Canadian facilities making the practice mandatory for their staff.
Science? Pharma? Oh that's a good one. Let's try this again. Did you know that all medical research is now being done by Big Pharma and they are dictating medical practice? They have successfully invaded medical schools and are in control of what the students are taught. Have you ever noticed that conventional medicine only offers two things and that everyone else is a quack? Pharma has no interest in wellness. That's why there are only treatments but no cure.More Proof Flu Shots Don't Work
Here is a very interesting line from the article. They lobbied on behalf of, who was that?: Despite their ineffectiveness, public health and hospital officials have also lobbied hard on behalf of pharmaceutical companies to increase the percentage of health-care workers who get vaccinated, with a handful of Canadian facilities making the practice mandatory for their staff.
You know what is a really good one? Citing mercola.com.
All medical research is not being done by "BigPharma", less than half of it is. Of course there are lobbies, there are lobbies for everything, including nursing, CAM, etc. Unfortuantely it's how government works, at least here.
An actual study looking at the same issue; a pair-matched CRT study rather than a review, or an editorial as above.
CONCLUSION: These results support influenza vaccination of staff caring for institutionalized elderly people.
Lemaitre, M., Meret, T., Rothanâ€Tondeur, M., Belmin, J., Lejonc, J. L., Luquel, L., ... & Carrat, F. (2009). Effect of influenza vaccination of nursing home staff on mortality of residents: a clusterâ€randomized trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(9), 1580-1586.
GMOs are king and stated to be safe, yet no one one in D.C. eats food with GMOs.
Where do you people get this crazy stuff?? Please show me some legitimate source documenting that "no one in D.C. eats food with GMOs." And how, exactly, do the people of DC (and when you say "people in DC," I assume you're talking about the upper echelons of the federal government, members of Congress, Cabinet members, etc., and not the large numbers of regular working folks in DC) avoid GMOs, when they are now widely used in prepared/processed foods and there's no requirement for labelling?
Where do you people get this crazy stuff?? Please show me some legitimate source documenting that "no one in D.C. eats food with GMOs." And how, exactly, do the people of DC (and when you say "people in DC," I assume you're talking about the upper echelons of the federal government, members of Congress, Cabinet members, etc., and not the large numbers of regular working folks in DC) avoid GMOs, when they are now widely used in prepared/processed foods and there's no requirement for labelling?
Oh elkpark, you are soooo naive. Surely you understand that a secret list of all the food products containing GMO'S has been distributed to all people in power, so that they know what foods to avoid. It's all part of the nefarious secret plan to kill off all the "sheeple". After that they'll live happily ever after in a world inhabited only by the "power elite". Eeerr... It's such a brilliant plan
had to look it up, never did get into such . makes no sense.
Breathe, breathe in the airDon't be afraid to care
Leave but don't leave me
Look around, choose your own ground
For long you live and high you fly
And smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
And all your touch and all you see
Is all your life will ever be
Run rabbit run
Dig that hole, forget the sun
And when at last the work is done
Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
For long you live and high you fly
But only if you ride the tide
And balanced on the biggest wave
You race towards an early grave
but what you are describing has nothing to do with her posts.
If you are referring to my comments, I'll reserve a response for after you've given a young asthmatic person chest compressions and epi over the course of 25 minutes, only to know the parents will decide to turn off the vent (aka, "pull the plug" as the lay people put it) 3 days later after brain death is declared and the loved ones can gather.If it were your kid, you'd feel the anger was justified.
BostonFNP, APRN
2 Articles; 5,584 Posts
There are about 20 RCT trials with influenza vaccine demonstrating effectiveness over placebo, you can take your pick.