I think there should be a three strike rule for patients who are consistently non-compliant with medical advice and medications following discharge. After 3 strikes, we don't take them back.
For example, a frequent flier, non-complaint patient with alcoholism, tobacco use, COPD, and HTN, comes in at least every week for alcohol withdrawal, gets put on CIWA, gets valium, but then either leaves AMA or does not comply with medical advice or use any of the resources provided (ETOH rehab, housing, getting a PCP, medications provided thru medicaid, respiratory meds/equipment), or take any of his/her medications, or be willing to stop smoking (even with nicotine patches provided), follow up on appts, or get any help for ETOH addiction.
I think after 3 strikes of being non-compliant and showing no effort to change or take advantage of what is provided, we shouldn't take them back for the same issue.
Of course, if the patient has another unrelated, serious problem, such as broken leg, gun shot wound, stroke, PNA, etc...we should treat them.
I feel like if we keep taking these types of patients back, we are enabling their destructive behavior. They can drink and drink, run out of money, come in with withdrawal, and we basically bail them out until they recover, then they go back out and do it all over again. The same thing for dialysis patients who consistently miss appointments, eat and drink whatever they want, and then frequently come in to the hospital in crisis with a weight gain of 12lb, K of 8.5, creatinine of 5.7, and a BUN of 85.
And yes, I know this would never be a realistic idea. I know we can't refuse care to patients (and I don't treat these patients differently, just internally I'm very frustrated at their waste of resources). And yes, I know ETOH withdrawal can be deadly, I'm just very frustrated at the moment