Published
Yah know...our facility is side rail free. None, just little grab bars on the top of the beds on both sides. At first we were leery. Yes, they do cause harm, but they are still nice to have when you are turning pts in bed and just for them to grab on too. Now we have the beds that go so low to the floor they can just roll out. We do have mats beside the bed too.
It is a big change. Many of us have been drilled to always check for side rails up before leaving the room. I still catch myself.
NOw I have had alert and oriented patients request all rails be up because they are used to sleeping in larger sized beds at home and they are afraid they will roll out. In that case, I put them up and document per patient request all rails up and patient has demonstrated appropiate use of call light system.
I don't see the issue of impingement injuries listed here as a reason not to use all 4 rails. Last I read, admittedly a couple of years ago, 30% will result in serious injury or death.
This is why I was surprised to see the news article use side rails x 4 as something the nurse should have done in the $1,000,000 case discussed in the other thread recently as well as the obvious climbing issue.
FireStarterRN, BSN, RN
3,824 Posts
It came up in another thread. My impression is that current research indicates that side rails not only don't prevent falls, but can contribute to them and their severity. I think side rails x 4 are considered a restraint.
Logically, falls don't result from people rolling out of bed, but from them getting out of bed but being too unable to safely ambulate. Confused or unsteady people will climb over side rails which will contribute to their likelihood of falling and to the severity of the fall.
Yet, I routinely still find side rails x 4 up on my patients.