RaDonda Vaught is seeking reinstatement of her Tennessee (TN) nursing license after a fatal medication error in 2017.
Updated:
TN state nursing board's 2021 decision to revoke her nursing license will be appealed in court on Tuesday, March 28. If the appeal is successful, she will face a retrial before the Tennessee Board of Nursing.
Nursing boards generally make decisions regarding the reinstatement of nursing licenses based on various factors, including the nature and severity of an offense, the rehabilitation efforts of the individual, and their ability to practice nursing safely and competently.
If RaDonda Vaught has completed the requirements (if any) and demonstrated that she could meet the standards of safe and competent nursing practice, then it may be possible for her to have her RN license reinstated. However, this decision ultimately rests with the state nursing board.
Most of us recall the RaDonda Vaught case in 2017 because it involved a fatal medication error, and she was charged with reckless homicide for the mistake. The decision to prosecute her made history because it set a precedent for criminalizing medical errors.
On December 26, 2017, RaDonda Vaught, a 35-year-old RN, worked as a "help-all" nurse at the Nashville, Tennessee-based Vanderbilt University Medical Center. She was sent to Radiology Services to administer VERSED (midazolam) to Charlene Murphey, a 75-year-old woman recovering from a brain injury and scheduled for a PET scan.
Charlene Murphey was experiencing anxiety, and her provider ordered Versed, a sedative, to help her through the procedure. RaDonda entered the letters "ve" for Versed (the brand name) in the automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) search field.
No matches populated the screen under the patient's profile, so RaDonda used the ADC override function and again entered "ve," this time mistakenly selecting vecuronium.
Vecuronium is a neuromuscular blocking agent, and patients must be mechanically ventilated when administered vecuronium. RaDonda reconstituted the drug and administered what she thought was one mg of Versed.
Unaware of her mistake, RaDonda left the patient unmonitored and went on to her next help-all assignment in the ED to conduct a swallow test.
Charlene Murphey was discovered about 30 minutes later by a transporter who noticed she wasn't breathing. She had sustained an unwitnessed respiratory arrest and was pulseless. She was coded, intubated, and taken back to ICU but was brain-dead and died within twelve hours.
Legal System
On February 4th, 2019, RaDonda was indicted and arrested on charges of reckless criminal homicide and impaired adult abuse.
On May 13, 2022, she was found guilty of criminally negligent homicide and gross neglect of an impaired adult, and sentenced to 3 years of supervised probation.
Board of Nursing
On September 27, 2019, the TN Department of Health (Nursing Board) reversed its previous decision not to pursue discipline against the nurse and charged RaDonda Vaught with:
On July 23, 2021, at the BON disciplinary trial, the Tennessee (TN) Board of Nursing revoked RaDonda Vaught's professional nursing license indefinitely, fined her $3,000, and stipulated that she pay up to $60,000 in prosecution costs.
Many opposed RaDonda Vaught being charged with a crime, including the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), the Institute of Safe Medicine Practice (ISMP), and the American Nurses Association (ANA).
If nurses fear reporting their errors for fear of criminal charges, it discourages ethical principles of honesty.
But should RaDonda be allowed to practice nursing again?
The (ISMP) felt strongly that revoking her license was a travesty and that the severity of the outcome wrongly influenced the decision. Contributing system errors were minimized, and RaDonda Vaught became the scapegoat, while Vanderbilt escaped full notoriety.
The ISMP said RaDonda displayed human error and at-risk behaviors but not reckless behavior. She did not act with evil intent and is a second victim of a fatal error. In a Just Culture, discipline is not meted out for human error.
Do you think RaDonda Vaught should be allowed to practice nursing again, and why or why not?
Thank you for your thoughts!
toomuchbaloney said:We agree that she killed that woman with negligent practice and that she was appropriately prosecuted and that she shouldn't practice as a nurse ever again... right?
Yes, close, except for the prosecution. Good to know. Here's from a previous early post
Here's where I stand-
RV should not get her license back and should never practice nursing again. She doesn't demonstrate enough insight to be safe.
I believe medication errors should not be prosecuted. Healthcare professionals will then fail to self-report.
During the investigation, Vanderbilt failed to uphold evidence-based practice and was deceitful. This did not cause the error, but their actions, including the cover-up, were wrong.
Nurse Beth said:Yes, close, except for the prosecution. Good to know. Here's from a previous early post
Here's where I stand-
RV should not get her license back and should never practice nursing again. She doesn't demonstrate enough insight to be safe.
I believe medication errors should not be prosecuted. Healthcare professionals will then fail to self-report.
During the investigation, Vanderbilt failed to uphold evidence-based practice and was deceitful. This did not cause the error, but their actions, including the cover-up, were wrong.
Again, the bad actions of the facility are separate from the nurse's failure to practice safely and the death caused by her negligence and reckless practice. This wasn't a med error, this was negligent and reckless practice, the prosecution was appropriate. A med error is a failure to correctly execute one of the necessary steps in correct administration of a drug. A complete failure to follow ANY standards of practice for medication administration is not an error, that's a practice of reckless disregard and negligence. IMV
toomuchbaloney said:Again, the bad actions of the facility are separate from the nurse's failure to practice safely and the death caused by her negligence and reckless practice. This wasn't a med error, this was negligent and reckless practice, the prosecution was appropriate. A med error is a failure to correctly execute one of the necessary steps in correct administration of a drug. A complete failure to follow ANY standards of practice for medication administration is not an error, that's a practice of reckless disregard and negligence. IMV
At first I agreeded with prosecution but then I decided to base my decision on principle and not outcome/severity. It's hard to do because of emotion around this case.
Nurse Beth said:At first I agreeded with prosecution but then I decided to base my decision based on principle and not outcome/severity. It's hard to do because of emotion around this case.
I've always agreed with prosecution. As I said, this wasn't an error, this was evidence of a negligent and reckless nursing practice. We don't know how many people she has negatively impacted with these substandard practice habits.
I don't think we should ignore criminal behavior for some outside principle... not politics and not professional protection.
KalipsoRed21, BSN, RN
495 Posts
Ha! See I knew there was a more concise way to get to the point.?? Thanks!