Published
Inspired by another thread I saw, just wondering what people's thoughts are: Should there be a limit on attempts? Why or why not? Personally I feel that if you can't pass it by the second time, some serious re-evaluations should be made
Has anyone thought that in some cases, the nursing schools themselves didn't properly prepare students? My class had a 100% pass rate first try, most likely because we were adequately prepared. How many nursing schools are popping up in your area? Are they all excellent programs? Doubt it.
Agree with previous posters, require some sort of remediation after a certain number of failed attempts.
Also very true that some programs don't adequately prepare students for nclex. I know a couple nurses who were good with content, but needed lots of practice with nclex style questions.
Has anyone thought that in some cases, the nursing schools themselves didn't properly prepare students? My class had a 100% pass rate first try, most likely because we were adequately prepared. How many nursing schools are popping up in your area? Are they all excellent programs? Doubt it.
Absolutely thought of, and discussed at length, many times throughout this website. But the fact remains that one must demonstrate a minimum competency to begin practice as a nurse; if one attends a poor program the consequence of that is either that the student has to study that much more to achieve minimum competency, OR will fail the exam, having failed to do so.
There are lousy programs everywhere, but that doesn't mean that the standards for entry to practice should be dropped to accomodate bad programs. No, the standard is set where it is, and anyone who seeks licensure needs to meet that standard.
There are special accomodations for disablility, I think there should be for English as second language as well. These people shouldn't be punished for it, but there has to be a way to judge competency without multiple tests.
A disability that does not impair one from competent nursing practice can be accomodated. Someone who cannot effectively communicate in the English language cannot be considered minimally competent to practice nursing in the United States.
Someone may be simply fabulous at nursing in Brazil, but speak only Portugese. I think it's reasonable to say that the nurse wouldn't be fabulous at all if trying to communicate with healthcare staff and patients in, say, San Francisco. In other words....not competent to be part of a nursing team.
There was a thread a while back, in which a new grad felt he was not getting "enough" code/trauma experience here in the US. He asked the members about working in other countries to get more experience (suggesting that there was a higher code rate, trauma rate, whatever) in those poor needy countries. He didn't speak any language other than English, so....naturally the question arose, "how do you expect to be an effective member of a code team without a clue as to what the rest of the people around you are saying?!"
And there you have it.
Personally I feel that if you can't pass it by the second time, some serious re-evaluations should be made
Agreed. If two attempts hasn't done it for an RN candidate, something's not quite right. I think Hurst and Kaplan offer first-time pass guarantees or money back, as well as free remediation. But yes, if twice didn't make it happen, may need to rethink one's approach.
Guest575949
113 Posts
This!