Moving On Up: Clinical Ladder Programs, are they really worth it?

Clinical Ladders are used by many institutions to recognize nurses as they progress from a novice level to that of expert. This article offers some pros and cons of participating in a clinical ladder program. Nurses General Nursing Article

  1. What is your opinion of Clinical Ladder Programs?

    • I love it. I am currently an active participant.
    • I do it for the money.
    • I dislike them. I am not an active participant.
    • Not offered at my facility, but I would participate if it was available.
    • I have more important things to do with my time.

31 members have participated

Clinical Ladder programs have been used for years to recognize nurses as they progress through levels of nursing practice starting at novice and culminating in an expert level. These ladders are often based on the five levels presented in Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Theory. Here is a brief refresher of the five levels of Benner's Theory:

Novice Nurse

A new nurse or a nurse with no experience in the field they are entering. Both the new graduate and the nurse transitioning to a new field of practice (for example- Med-Surg to Oncology) would be considered a Novice. The Novice learns rules and applies those rules universally to all patients.

Advanced Beginner Nurse

The Advanced Beginner Nurse has gained practical experience and has learned how to conditionally apply the rules on a patient by patient basis in future clinical situations.

Competent Nurse

The competent nurse has become more efficient and organized having learned from prior experiences. This nurse is starting to see how their clinical actions impact long-term goals.

Proficient Nurse

The Proficient Nurse views their patient holistically and has learned through significant practice how to distinguish between significant aspects of the clinical picture and those that are not as significant.

Expert Nurse

The Expert Nurse relies on intuition gained from years of experience and can hone in on key aspects of the clinical picture in order to achieve the best outcome for the patient.

If your facility offers a Clinical Ladder Program, then you may wonder if it is worth the time and trouble to complete the requirements. I hope to help you to reach a decision by offering a brief look at a few of the pros and cons to climbing the Clinical Ladder.

PROS

Money

Most people can use more money and a bonus offered by a Clinical Ladder Program is certainly a nice incentive. Some programs offer one time bonuses while others offer an increase in pay.

Recognition

Achieving and maintaining a level on the Clinical Ladder is a way to both recognize your achievements and to distinguish yourself from others at your facility.

Networking

Working your way through the Clinical Ladder process provides the opportunity to interact with those you may not have routine contact with. Examples include those in administration, leadership, education, and peers practicing in different clinical areas within your facility.

Professional Development

If the money, recognition, and networking aspects of the Clinical Ladder are not important to you, then there is always the value of professional development. Participating in the Clinical Ladder program may very well lead to growth in your profession. One example would be a nurse of 20 years that never saw the importance of obtaining National Certification. Participation in the Clinical Ladder program may motivate the nurse to obtain certification to move up the Clinical Ladder.

CONS

Time and Effort

The Clinical Ladder program requires a significant amount of time and effort that may not pay off in the end. A 5% increase in pay offered as an incentive could be accomplished with a lot less headache by simply working a little bit of overtime. If you work 40 hours per week, then that would mean an additional 2 hours per week or one extra 8-hour shift per month. Add the overtime and possible incentives for working that extra shift and you are already ahead of the game.

Politics

Unfortunately, politics still plays a significant role in the nursing profession. Opportunities that allow an individual to advance up the Clinical Ladder may not be offered to nurses in an equitable manner.

Lack of Opportunity

For example, you may be able to acquire points for achievements such as being a preceptor, learning new skills, or cross-training to other areas. However, there may not be money in the budget to cross-train or learn new skills. In addition, if there are no new employees on your unit, then your chances of being a preceptor are pretty much non-existent.

Upfront Expenses

You may be required to pay out of your own pocket to achieve skills such as National Certification. If your organization only offers reimbursement upon successful attainment of the certification, then you will initially pay hundreds of dollars up front and then wait until you pass to get reimbursed.

The Rules Can Change

It can be extremely frustrating to put forth the time, effort, and possibly money into completing the Clinical Ladder Program only to find out later that the requirements have been changed. An example would be volunteering at the local blood drive for 8 hours each month thinking that it would count toward the community involvement requirement. Then right before you turn in your completed packet, the organization addends the requirements so that your participation at the local blood drive is no longer accepted toward that requirement.

It Can Disappear

Organizations are not obligated to continue the program. All of your time and effort are for naught if your organization pulls the plug on the clinical ladder.

What do you think? Are Clinical Ladder programs worth the effort or would you rather spend your time doing something else? Share your thoughts in the comments section and take the poll to let others know your opinion.

Specializes in Adult and pediatric emergency and critical care.
Every facility I've ever worked for that had a clinical ladder offered the increase in pay through the clinical ladder IN ADDITION TO their regular annual performance raise, not instead of.

Where did the money for the clinical ladder come from? Could that have been used for cost of living and merit raises if there was no clinical ladder? Could the raises at your hospital have been more substantial as a result?

Specializes in OB-Gyn/Primary Care/Ambulatory Leadership.
Where did the money for the clinical ladder come from? Could that have been used for cost of living and merit raises if there was no clinical ladder? Could the raises at your hospital have been more substantial as a result?

COL and merit raises are always a set percentage. So no, they would not have been larger if the clinical ladder did not exist.

Specializes in orthopedic/trauma, Informatics, diabetes.

"Rarely do great nurses advance through clinical ladder programs, from my experience it has been those who do busy work and have the right connections to have their portfolios approved. I feel that it is also just a way to pinch pennies rather than given nurses who are working hard for their unit the raise that they deserve."

Wow. What I do is not "busy work". I try to find ways to make work better for my colleagues as I have an affinity for EPIC. I use what comes to me easier and try to help others. My other passion is being the diabetes expert on my unit. I have 2 kids with Type 1 diabetes and I get tired of pts being mis-identified and watching nurses struggle with insulins and BG, etc. I live it every day, 24/7 and if one patient has a better outcome because of the "busy" work I so teaching about diabetes, so be it. I am also a former teacher and love to precept.

I may not be a "really great nurse" as you want to put it, but being a great nurse includes helping other nurses. To me, that is what I am doing. Not being some brown-nose lazy nurse, as you are inferring. It is not easy working up the ladder. Generalizing what you think it is, is not fair to those of us who work really hard to accomplish what we have.

It's hard to measure clinical competence or excellence by many of these activities.

I've seen nurses who are not "expert" achieve Clinical Nurse III by doing the busy work required.

Thinking there has to be a better way.

I disagree with the premise that a clinical ladder program measures clinical proficiency. Rather, I believe that it's one measurement of professional engagement (working on QI projects, joining committees, earning a certification). I'm sure there are seasoned nurses with incredible clinical competence/proficiency out there who chose not to participate in the clinical ladder opportunities, and that doesn't make them any better or worse of a nurse. Rather the programs are meant to encourage staff nurses to take initiative in unit engagement or self-improvement.

Rarely do great nurses advance through clinical ladder programs, from my experience it has been those who do busy work and have the right connections to have their portfolios approved. I feel that it is also just a way to pinch pennies rather than given nurses who are working hard for their unit the raise that they deserve.

I've worked/studied in a handful of hospitals which offered merit-based raises (including clinical ladder programs), and I've worked/studied in a handful of (union) hospitals with a set annual raise negotiated in our contract. In my experience, which I recognize is limited....

On average, the staff in the hospitals with merit-based raises (including clinical ladder programs) were far more engaged in committees, shared governance, and unit improvement. Staff were more actively involved in developing unit policies and making changes for the better (rather than a top-down approach driven by management). Even the nurses who chose not to participate in the clinical ladder showed more buy-in toward these changes, since they came from peers rather than management.

Staff with pre-determined annual contract-based raises were often great nurses, but were more apathetic when it came to unit development and participation. When nurses (myself included) took the initiative to participate in committees and shared governance in order to make changes which would benefit our staff as a whole, it was very difficult to get staff buy-in and create sufficient momentum. We started out with a bunch of enthusiastic go-getters, and ended up with the exact same policies and even more frustrated, burnt out, apathetic nurses.

I understand that our job description is to come to work, perform our nursing skills, and go home; there are some very proficient expert nurses who do just that, and have no interest in unit advancement or participation outside of work. That's ok. However, I think that clearly defined merit-based raises (including clinical ladder programs) provide both financial and personal incentive for nurses to contribute to unit improvement.

IMHO, staff buy-in and participation is crucial to unit improvement; who knows the unit's needs better than staff? But how can we get staff buy-in and participation if there's literally no incentive for staff to show up.

Specializes in Adult and pediatric emergency and critical care.
"Rarely do great nurses advance through clinical ladder programs, from my experience it has been those who do busy work and have the right connections to have their portfolios approved. I feel that it is also just a way to pinch pennies rather than given nurses who are working hard for their unit the raise that they deserve."

Wow. What I do is not "busy work". I try to find ways to make work better for my colleagues as I have an affinity for EPIC. I use what comes to me easier and try to help others. My other passion is being the diabetes expert on my unit. I have 2 kids with Type 1 diabetes and I get tired of pts being mis-identified and watching nurses struggle with insulins and BG, etc. I live it every day, 24/7 and if one patient has a better outcome because of the "busy" work I so teaching about diabetes, so be it. I am also a former teacher and love to precept.

I may not be a "really great nurse" as you want to put it, but being a great nurse includes helping other nurses. To me, that is what I am doing. Not being some brown-nose lazy nurse, as you are inferring. It is not easy working up the ladder. Generalizing what you think it is, is not fair to those of us who work really hard to accomplish what we have.

Why do you assume that I am calling you out or personally insulting you? I did not say all nurses.

But how can we get staff buy-in and participation if there's literally no incentive for staff to show up.

The incentive used to be a sense of mutual respect, mutual give-and-take. There didn't used to "literally" be no incentive for staff to show up. If that is the case now whenever there isn't a more tangible reward system in place, then that itself is part of the problem.

I and many of my peers have "given back" a great deal in the course of simply doing our jobs over the years (I'm talking about things like taking on extra responsibilities, helping with special projects, donating time off the clock, using personal financial resources to help provide things for "unit stock" which our patients needed or which could enhance their visit, making positive suggestions about how to improve a process, training and teaching other nurses, mentoring, arranging unit social outings, financially and emotionally supporting struggling co-workers, attending trainings out of personal interest which could then be shared with the group....in addition we provided free PR everywhere we went because we were proud to be associated with our workplace...the list of many ways we engaged and gave back goes on and on and on). We did it happily, too! It was win/win.

Things like this didn't happen because people came up with various ways to motivate nurses. Honestly, that idea is an offensive false narrative that has been put forth very deliberately (not in this thread but in the world of healthcare). I'll agree that things have changed. I'd just like to point out that many of us were busy doing the things described above, and more, when they changed.

Where did the money for the clinical ladder come from? Could that have been used for cost of living and merit raises if there was no clinical ladder? Could the raises at your hospital have been more substantial as a result?

Our system had a revamp in the clinical ladder setup last year, and employee raises were at least 1% lower for all staff (if not more) due to this re-structure and "market adjustment".

...

IMHO, staff buy-in and participation is crucial to unit improvement; who knows the unit's needs better than staff? But how can we get staff buy-in and participation if there's literally no incentive for staff to show up.

Yes, but after watching and trying to make changes and seeing nothing really happening, why bother. Many facilities make a great play of it by management to staff, but when you look at what actually changes from employee up, it is minimal, if any.

Our facility has an annual clinical ladder, 2 levels ($2,500/yr or $3,500/yr). For the first one, you have to have at least a BSN. For the second one, BSN and a specialty Certification (CEN, CCRN etc), with each required training, volunteering, precepting, specific procedures (Port access, conscious sedation) and other things. You need to make a binder with all the requirments and signatures in it, and turn it in with manager approval. I will work a few extra hours each month in overtime and make more money with that time.

I am one that comes in and does my job and goes home. If you want to do more, that is fine, but it is not for me. I don't buy into shared governance (never seen it work, I am sure it has somewhere, but not in my experience). Management does what is best for the bottom line.

My calculations in the past have always shown it's not worth it financially. That doesn't mean you can't do some things suggested as part of your employer's program. I was heavily engaged in policy committee & informatics activities - but got paid for the hours.

Specializes in OB-Gyn/Primary Care/Ambulatory Leadership.
My calculations in the past have always shown it's not worth it financially. That doesn't mean you can't do some things suggested as part of your employer's program. I was heavily engaged in policy committee & informatics activities - but got paid for the hours.

Again, every place I've worked at that has a clinical ladder program (4 different facilities over my 12-year career), nurses were still paid for their meeting and committee time. They clocked in and out for them, just as they do for staff meetings, BLS class, etc.

Our hospital is doing away with the clinical ladders, but I have no idea what will take the place of them.

Specializes in Wound care; CMSRN.

This just looks like another way for the MBA's to quantify and nitpick a process that already happens in responsible hospitals that care about competent patient care and staff development.

Its just another attempt to turn love of the work into a tool of coercion and discrimination.

I am for increasing education in anyway usually. I find the program at my hospital to be ridiculous. During its inception, it was not for a money reward. Now it is and until this year, one had to reapply annually! Now that is ridiculous. If you achieve the highest level, and you stay in the same area, and you have good evaluations, why should one need to keep re-applying? Also, more "points" are given to people who continue to get degrees or publish, but not to experience. There are many bedside nurses who don't want to pursue a higher degree, or dislike writing. Many of them are excellent nurses, and are people I would prefer to have care for me or my family. When one is a patient, that person doesn't care if you have a masters or you have published anything if you can't take proper care. At my hospital, you make no more money as a staff nurse regardless of degree UNLESS you join the clinical program. I'll take the diploma nurse any day, and I have a BSN. No patient ever asks"what level are you on the clinical ladder".