Mechanical Compression Devices

Specialties Emergency

Published

Specializes in Emergency/Cath Lab.

I recently moved to a new hospital. The old one I was at had a LUCAS and we used it a lot and loved it. The place I am at now does not have any devices. I'm curious if this is the new norm if we are behind the times. Personally, I love them. So what say you allnurses

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in ICU / PCU / Telemetry / Oncology.

Is that the same thing that some of us call The Thumper?

Up Vote Up Vote ×

We got nothing. Just man power ;)

Up Vote Up Vote ×

My ED has several, some docs like them others not so much.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Pediatrics Retired.
Is that the same thing that some of us call The Thumper?

Yea, our local EMS used one of those during the 70s; it was powered by the O2 cylinder on the unit...but went by the wayside. I haven't encountered one since.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in ED, Pedi Vasc access, Paramedic serving 6 towns.

Hi,

On my ambulance we use the Zoll Autopulse. I think it is way to heavy and clunky, plus we had a A LOT of malfunctions all the time before they switched out their batteries and made new ones. Now it seems to be more reliable, but the problem is if the band is just slightly misaligned or twisted it stops working and I have seen people focus more on the device than actually getting compressions done which is dangerous.

If they could develop smaller devices that had higher reliability then I would agree with them, but until then I rarely use the auto pulse. The only thing it is good for is performing compressions during extrication when a human cannot do them, but now that is even rare since we work 'em for 20 and leave them if ROSC has not been obtained and they have low end tidal readings.

Annie

Up Vote Up Vote ×

The hospital the I worked at 3 years ago. The one I work at now does not even though we see out fair share of codes. I loved the auto pulse!!

Up Vote Up Vote ×

The LUCAS is great and imo better then the Zoll design. That being said it is expensive and "cost prohibitive" for many institutions and ems providers. I quoted that b/c it is bs with the cost of healthcare but that was the excuse I heard. I believe studies have been done that show no increase in save rate or better compressions using a mechanical compression device, however it has been shown to calm down the scene and allow the code to flow a little more seamless. Sorry I can't quote the actual studies

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Emergency, Telemetry, Transplant.

A few local EMS services have them. Our ED does not. Usually there is not a shortage of qualified individuals to do compressions.

Up Vote Up Vote ×

We have one in ours but rarely use it. It was out for repair or something for a month or more so I think a lot of people forget we have it. Also the last couple we have had were too big for the LUCAS which is another issue. As another poster said we typically have more than enough people to do chest compressions.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in ED, Pedi Vasc access, Paramedic serving 6 towns.

I actually just finished up at a conference and many of the lectures were with regards to resuscitation of cardiac arrest. There are studies that report not difference between manual compression and those performed by a mechanical device.

We use it more so during extrication of patients and of course it is safer during transport than having an unsecured person trying to do CPR in a moving ambulance, especially with the frost heaves!

Up Vote Up Vote ×
+ Add a Comment