High-Value and Low-Value Patients

Some patient populations are highly prized in our society while others are very much devalued. This is because American society views some clusters of people as 'high value' and others as 'low value.' Do you believe that all people were created equally? Do you feel that all individuals are treated equally? Nurses Announcements Archive Article

Updated:  

A handful of readers might have had knee-jerk reactions after reading the title of this piece. Some of you were probably frowning as you muttered to yourselves, "High-value patients? Low-value patients? Who in the hell does the writer think she is?"

Let me get one thing straight. I'm not the one who assigned values to different clusters of patients. In fact, my personal belief is that all people have the same inherent worth and esteem, regardless of their current situation in life. To be more precise, the greater society in which we inhabit has ascribed different levels of importance to different groups. We sense this disparity when we see how well certain diseases are publicized while other afflictions are simply blown off. We know this gap exists by the types of responses people give when we inform them of our nursing specialties.

In previous posts I've speculated that the prestige of our nursing jobs is strongly tied to the various patient populations with whom we intermingle. To be straight up, society as a whole places an extremely high value on pregnant women (especially if they're middle class or higher), the very rich, infants, children, teenagers, healthy young adults, celebrities, thin people, politicians, and very good-looking people.

To flip the coin, society places a much lower value on the elderly, the overweight and obese, poor people, undereducated people, alcoholics, drug addicts, immigrant migrant workers, the mentally ill, the perpetually unemployed, the disabled, ex convicts, criminals, the developmentally disabled, and the chronically ill.

So if you are a nurse who works in nursing homes / LTC, jails, prisons, psychiatric facilities, group homes for the developmentally disabled, addictions / drug treatment centers, migrant worker community health programs, chronic dialysis, or free clinics, members of the public will not respond with much interest because you regularly work with patients that have been deemed 'low value.' Even many of our colleagues in the healthcare community will think your specialty is a supposedly 'lesser' type of nursing. Some will even ask, "Why don't you want to do real nursing?"

On the other hand, if you are a nurse who discloses that you work in a specialty where you encounter 'high value' patient populations on a constant basis (labor & delivery, postpartum, pediatrics, NICU, PICU, reproductive medicine, aesthetic plastic surgery, trauma, sports medicine, the ER, etc.), members of the general public generally respond with a higher level of interest, and your colleagues in the nursing community tend to view you in a more favorable light.

We see the bias in the amount of attention that certain health problems generate. Type 2 diabetics generally include the overweight and obese, the elderly, racial-ethnic minorities, and other less glamorous groups of people. Does a colored ribbon exist for all the people who died secondary to complications from diabetes? If so, please tell me about it. However, breast cancer has captured the minds of the American public after a young woman from a prominent family lost her battle against the horrible disease many moons ago. Now we live in a sea of pink ribbons.

To sum it up, some demographic groups are highly valued in our society while others are blatantly devalued. Society views some clusters of people as 'high value' and others as 'low value.' As much as I believe that all people were created equally, I know in my heart that all individuals are not regarded equally.

My fiance had prostate and testicular cancer at a very young age (early 20s). His mom had breast cancer. She's brave. He's just some dude. Even she talks about it that way.

So, the fact that we don't know if he can have kids yet (we're not trying for a bit yet) isn't as important as her "fighting breast cancer", because she's a mother.

(By the way, we place also a lot of importance on "being a parent". It IS important, but it doesn't mean people without kids aren't important.)

Specializes in PDN; Burn; Phone triage.
Wow-I'm sure the people on the forums at Breastcancer.org would disagree with you and Ruby Vee's assessment of breast cancer and the people who have it. I know Ruby has/had it but maybe spending some time reading the posts in the Stage 4 section might change your mind about how brave these woman are.

I just can't get over your statement though that breast cancer is caused by lifestyle risk factors. Totally ignorant comment. You need to educate yourself about the disease. I'm sure a woman with stage 4 BC would love to have someone tell them that. A lot of woman who have it have no risk factors. Mammograms are not recommended for woman under 40 on a yearly basis yet they have the densest breast. Go visit Breast Cancer.org and see how many young woman have breast cancer who thought they would never get it because they had no risk factors.

And Ruby, please explain why a TKR takes more courage than having surgery for breast cancer. I'd like to see you explain that comment to someone who has stage 4 breast cancer which is a death sentence because there is no cure for it.

Wow, I'm just flabbergasted by these two comments. Breast cancer might be a high value when it comes to patients but I don't lump them in the same category as self entitled celebrities or rich people. Cancer patients in general, are very brave in my book. It takes more courage to fight a disease and suffer through the side effects of treatment for a disease that you know might kill you in the long run than it does to have a TKR.

Well, I was kind of skeptical of the OP's post until this particular post was made. Now I'm a convert.

Specializes in CCU, SICU, CVSICU, Precepting & Teaching.
The insights in this thread as to the value placed on varying forms of cancer...made my heart sink. I never thought about that.

I've been an oncology nurse, and I never thought about it either, other than a vague feeling when people told me how "brave" and "strong" I was upon finding out I'd had breast cancer. I would not have been able to articulate it as well as the OP, but she's right.

Specializes in CCU, SICU, CVSICU, Precepting & Teaching.
My fiance had prostate and testicular cancer at a very young age (early 20s). His mom had breast cancer. She's brave. He's just some dude. Even she talks about it that way.

So, the fact that we don't know if he can have kids yet (we're not trying for a bit yet) isn't as important as her "fighting breast cancer", because she's a mother.

(By the way, we place also a lot of importance on "being a parent". It IS important, but it doesn't mean people without kids aren't important.)

Thank you! WE DO place a lot of importance on being a parent -- to the extent where people without kids aren't as important. As someone whose cervical cancer (no ribbons, no "brave" or "strong" there!) prevented her from having kids, thank you for saying that!

Thank you! WE DO place a lot of importance on being a parent -- to the extent where people without kids aren't as important. As someone whose cervical cancer (no ribbons, no "brave" or "strong" there!) prevented her from having kids, thank you for saying that!

My wonderful, amazing mom couldn't have kids (something was wrong with her ovaries, apparently she didn't have eggs able to be fertilized), and adopted me. When I was 5, she had pre-cancerous cells in her uterus, so they decided to take out the whole kit 'n' caboodle. Just because she couldn't do what so many women can doesn't make her any less of a person (or a mother!).

I'm 31. I had one pregnancy, but I spontaneously aborted probably due to diabetes complications. (It was VERY unplanned.) I haven't tried again, because I need to focus on keeping myself healthy in order to support pregnancy. Does it mean I'm any less a woman or person than my high school classmates or other friends who have bunches of children? Nope. It just means I'm going to be more prepared when I DO start trying, if or when I do. And if I don't, well, that's just how it's supposed to be.

Specializes in LTC, assisted living, med-surg, psych.
The insights in this thread as to the value placed on varying forms of cancer...made my heart sink. I never thought about that.

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who's noticed the elephant in the cancer room.

I've gotten to the point where I'm boycotting everything pink during October. I wonder sometimes if breast CA gets so much attention because breasts are so objectified in our culture.......not to take anything away from its sufferers, but other cancers don't even seem to merit a single day, let alone an entire month.

Granted, my perspective is somewhat skewed because my husband has pancreatic CA and nobody's running marathons or hosting benefits for that. But I do wonder why October can't simply be "Cancer Awareness Month".

Specializes in Complex pedi to LTC/SA & now a manager.

One of the local cancer centers is currently running a "ribbons come in many colors". Most cancers have a ribbon, light blue for ovarian cancer I believe. The point being that a ALL cancer had the potential to be life altering and devastating no matter what the stage

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who's noticed the elephant in the cancer room.

I've gotten to the point where I'm boycotting everything pink during October. I wonder sometimes if breast CA gets so much attention because breasts are so objectified in our culture.......not to take anything away from its sufferers, but other cancers don't even seem to merit a single day, let alone an entire month.

Granted, my perspective is somewhat skewed because my husband has pancreatic CA and nobody's running marathons or hosting benefits for that. But I do wonder why October can't simply be "Cancer Awareness Month".

Yes! Exactly. This has always been thought.

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who's noticed the elephant in the cancer room.

I've gotten to the point where I'm boycotting everything pink during October. I wonder sometimes if breast CA gets so much attention because breasts are so objectified in our culture.......not to take anything away from its sufferers, but other cancers don't even seem to merit a single day, let alone an entire month.

Granted, my perspective is somewhat skewed because my husband has pancreatic CA and nobody's running marathons or hosting benefits for that. But I do wonder why October can't simply be "Cancer Awareness Month".

I think you shot the elephant, Viva!

Breasts are highly valued in our culture--hence the emphasis on breast cancer awareness among women specifically. Yes, I'm aware that men don't comprise a large percentage of breast cancer, but why alienate that minority when breast cancer can and does affect them? It'd be one thing if it were ovarian cancer or uterine cancer or cervical cancer to employ specifically female-oriented language and colors, but men are in that group, too! In a day and age where the last thing you want to do is exclude a minority, men with breast cancer are a blatantly ignored group. My dad asked me the other day if men even get breast cancer. Try looking up that statistic and see how quickly you find it amongst all the stats and support groups for women.

Look at the language used in campaign strategies alone. Can you imagine a "save the home run!" T-shirt as a method of promoting cervical cancer awareness? Or "check it or I'll check it for you" for prostate cancer awareness? It's sad to me that something so serious is promoted with such juvenile/crude language (or slang, I suppose, is appropriate, too) and then conversely upheld and worshipped as the prom queen of cancers. Weird.

Specializes in retired LTC.
Thank you! WE DO place a lot of importance on being a parent -- to the extent where people without kids aren't as important. As someone whose cervical cancer (no ribbons, no "brave" or "strong" there!) prevented her from having kids, thank you for saying that!
So true. There's another current thread about Christmas holidays requests -off only for staff with families (intent meaning children).

High-value vs low-value variable again.

Specializes in Acute Care - Adult, Med Surg, Neuro.

To flip the coin, society places a much lower value on the elderly, the overweight and obese, poor people, undereducated people, alcoholics, drug addicts, immigrant migrant workers, the mentally ill, the perpetually unemployed, the disabled, ex convicts, criminals, the developmentally disabled, and the chronically ill.

This describes the patient population of where I work. We are often poorly stocked, with broken equipment, missing medications, and they under staff us. What we do and who we care for are not valued. Also, I was told that these patients are not "money-makers" for the hospital because many of them are under or un-insured. So while the specialty units get the best of everything, we are just scraping by.

Specializes in retired LTC.

Maybe we need a TV media change that would make low-value nursing specialties more into a high-value specialty. Like maybe George Clooney and Julianne Marguiles (sp?) working in a VD clinic in Newark, NJ. And how about Brad & Angelina behind the glass in a Detroit prison setting? Tom Cruise in a meth clinic in LA?

Oh, and we can watch as they drive in during blizzard conditions on Christmas in Newark. And there's a lockdown in Detroit. And LA is under curfew for earthquake. Boy, how exciting!!!

Maybe low-value moves up a notch or two toward high-value?

Does anybody else remember when newborn was NOT a desirous high-value unit? Like that's where old nurses went to work right before retirement?