Published
ideal environment, in a heartbeat.
work environments can make or break your job.
how can you enjoy your duties, if everything around you is negative/toxic?
whereas if there are aspects of your duties you don't enjoy, an ideal environment can take the sting out of it....offering support, teamwork, camaraderie.
esp since you've stated the less desirable duties, would be done infrequently.
best of everything. :balloons:
leslie
I have had to make that choice as well, and BOY am I ever glad I made the decisiont to accept the position where the environment won out!
Remember, the staff stays the same (for the most part). The pt. population is the only constant change you see on a daily basis.
I'd go for option #2, just like Leslie said! No brainer to me! :)
Ill be the odd one out here. It would depend. If it was a job where I was really looking to increase my skill set, and I just wouldnt be getting it at the job with nice co-workers, I might take it just to get the experience, but then continue to look elsewhere. I probably wouldnt stay long, but long enough to get some experience which might be enough to get me in the door to someplace I really want to work but didnt have the experience. Now keep in mind, I dont get involved in politics, I do my work and go home. I try to stay out of things if I can.
So if you were looking at two job offers and...Job #1) Offered the perfect position, the duties are exactly what you have been looking for BUT the environment is a concern... staff doesn't always get along, a consultant team has come in to help everyone "communicate better," the docs can be arrogant etc...
while,
Job #2) Offered the perfect environment, everyone is friendly and helpful, docs are sane, things are organized, etc.. etc.. but the position is not exactly what you wanted, it's close, but it contains some duties you were hoping to avoid. Those duties are infrequent, but will be stress inducing all the same.
What would you choose? The position with the ideal environment or the position with the ideal duties/responsibilites?
No, waiting for a job that contains the best of both worlds is not an option.
Job #2. You may be doing what you want in 1 but you're not going to enjoy it in a bad working environment. It'll suck all the joy out of you. Making you cranky at home and to others - at least it does to me.
Job 2 on the other hand, while not what you want exactly, offers a perfect working environment and there you are more likely to enjoy and love your work even when it comes time to do those less than desired tasks.
Good luck!
Catys_With_Me
93 Posts
So if you were looking at two job offers and...
Job #1) Offered the perfect position, the duties are exactly what you have been looking for BUT the environment is a concern... staff doesn't always get along, a consultant team has come in to help everyone "communicate better," the docs can be arrogant etc...
while,
Job #2) Offered the perfect environment, everyone is friendly and helpful, docs are sane, things are organized, etc.. etc.. but the position is not exactly what you wanted, it's close, but it contains some duties you were hoping to avoid. Those duties are infrequent, but will be stress inducing all the same.
What would you choose? The position with the ideal environment or the position with the ideal duties/responsibilites?
No, waiting for a job that contains the best of both worlds is not an option.