I came across this is little story today, it's not breaking news. I suspect that a member of the housekeeping staff knows something about the bomb threat that required the sweep for weapons.
According to police in Secaucus, the bomb threat — which later was determined to be bogus — was called in to Hudson Regional Hospital on July 18. During a search, bomb detection dogs led investigators to an unlocked office closet containing dozens of firearms.
Among the weapons were 11 handguns and 27 rifles or shotguns, according to police. The closet also contained a .45 caliber semi-automatic rifle with a high-capacity magazine that was determined to be an assault rifle, and a 14-round high-capacity handgun magazine.
The arrested the guy the next day.
What the heck do you think this guy was doing? It sounds very ominous that he was keeping those weapons there.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
1 hour ago, MaybeeRN said:
Please show us where he incited a mob to attack the Capitol? Show me what he has done to eliminate the Constitution? I can show you plenty of examples of Democrats trying to get rid of provisions of the 2nd amendment. Are they trying to destroy the Republic?
Why are you still clouded by ignorance of the details and facts surrounding the events of January 6, 2021? You must have, at least, a fundamental understanding of what Trump attempted to do after he lost the 2020 election and why it would have been the end of our republic had he succeeded.
Sure, you are welcome to bring facts to the table about the growing public desire to have improved regulation of dangerous firearms in our society. I'm skeptical of your ability to make a cogent argument that democrats are trying to destroy the republic... that's sounds more like partisan projection... but feel free to give that a try.
Why are you still clouded by ignorance of the details and facts surrounding the events of January 6, 2021? You must have, at least, a fundamental understanding of what Trump attempted to do after he lost the 2020 election and why it would have been the end of our republic had he succeeded.
Sure, you are welcome to bring facts to the table about the growing public desire to have improved regulation of dangerous firearms in our society. I'm skeptical of your ability to make a cogent argument that democrats are trying to destroy the republic... that's sounds more like partisan projection... but feel free to give that a try.
You mean when he told people to go to the Capitol peacefully? Maybe the police shouldn’t have gassed the peaceful protestors and it would have remained peaceful. Now what we are learning from Twitter (Which we already knew) is showing collusion against Trump from the media and the Democrats. Sounds like a stolen election.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
8 minutes ago, MaybeeRN said:
That’s because you have no evidence. Challenging an interpretation? Calling for banning guns liberals don’t like is the same as eliminating the constitutional right. We could argue about interpretations on the first amendment all day long. It’s the liberal Stalinist’s that are destroying the Republic.
Oh no... there's quite a bit of evidence... it's a shame that you have no knowledge of the evidence even though you have ample opportunity and access to the same facts, details and time line of events that we all enjoy.
Your projections are cute but not supported by any available evidence. Don't you want to discuss Trump's suggestion for dumping the constitution?
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Just now, MaybeeRN said:
You mean when he told people to go to the Capitol peacefully? Maybe the police shouldn’t have gassed the peaceful protestors and it would have remained peaceful. Now what we are learning from Twitter (Which we already knew) is showing collusion against Trump from the media and the Democrats. Sounds like a stolen election.
LOL
Oh wouldn't it be interesting for you to source any of the crazy right wing thinking that you share here? By now you understand that your conspiracy driven political beliefs represent the fringe of conservative republican thinking. The last election just showed that your narrow wing of the party has trouble getting candidates elected... thank the gawds.
Oh wouldn't it be interesting for you to source any of the crazy right wing thinking that you share here? By now you understand that your conspiracy driven political beliefs represent the fringe of conservative republican thinking. The last election just showed that your narrow wing of the party has trouble getting candidates elected... thank the gawds.
Elon has been releasing the documents all weekend. Try and keep up.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
45 minutes ago, MaybeeRN said:
Elon has been releasing the documents all weekend. Try and keep up.
LOL
Apparently you depend upon some reporting that has you believing that what Musk has released is big breaking news. Why don't you share a link to the reporting on these documents that you've mentioned?
Apparently you depend upon some reporting that has you believing that what Musk has released is big breaking news. Why don't you share a link to the reporting on these documents that you've mentioned?
Why? You’d just call it right wing propaganda. It’s what leftists do.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Just now, MaybeeRN said:
Why? You’d just call it right wing propaganda. It’s what leftists do.
So what? You criticize citations.
Are you too sensitive to withstand a harsh critique of your sources? It sort of seems like you are suggesting that you can't cite sources because then you'll just be victimized by the opinions of liberals.
In my book that's an excuse...just weakness posing as bravado.
The Supreme Court heard arguments today about a web designer who wants to be able to refuse service to LGTBQ people. Justice Alito thought it was somehow appropriate to joke about Black Santa, Ashley Madison, and black children dressed like KKK:
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
33 minutes ago, nursej22 said:
The Supreme Court heard arguments today about a web designer who wants to be able to refuse service to LGTBQ people. Justice Alito thought it was somehow appropriate to joke about Black Santa, Ashley Madison, and black children dressed like KKK:
The Roberts court will get an opportunity to damage our democracy.
Quote
The Supreme Court will decide before next Summer the most important case for American democracy in the almost two and a half centuries since America’s founding.
In Moore v. Harper, the Court will finally resolve whether there is a doctrine of constitutional interpretation known as the “independent state legislature.” If the Court concludes that there is such a doctrine, it would confer on state legislatures plenary, exclusive, and judicially unreviewable power both to redraw congressional districts for federal elections and to appoint state electors who quadrennially cast the votes for president and vice president on behalf of the voters of the states. It would mean that the partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts by state legislatures would not be reviewable by the state courts—including the states’ highest court—under their state constitutions.
Such a doctrine would be antithetical to the Framers’ intent, and to the text, fundamental design, and architecture of the Constitution.
The independent-state-legislature theory gained traction as the centerpiece of President Donald Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. In the Supreme Court, allies of the former president argued that the theory, as applied to the electors clause, enabled the state legislatures to appoint electors who would cast their votes for the former president, even though the lawfully certified electors were bound by state law to cast their votes for Joe Biden because he won the popular vote in those states. The Supreme Court declined to decide the question in December 2020. The former president and his allies continued thereafter to urge the state legislatures, and even self-appointed Trump supporters, to transmit to Congress alternative, uncertified electoral slates to be counted by Congress on January 6.
Trump's corrupt and anti American influence is a poison to the GOP and to our democratic republic. We get to watch as the Trump conservatives try to legalize the tools for stealing elections.
toomuchbaloney
16,086 Posts
Why are you still clouded by ignorance of the details and facts surrounding the events of January 6, 2021? You must have, at least, a fundamental understanding of what Trump attempted to do after he lost the 2020 election and why it would have been the end of our republic had he succeeded.
Sure, you are welcome to bring facts to the table about the growing public desire to have improved regulation of dangerous firearms in our society. I'm skeptical of your ability to make a cogent argument that democrats are trying to destroy the republic... that's sounds more like partisan projection... but feel free to give that a try.