Published Feb 20, 2007
2curlygirls
220 Posts
all i can say is, we'd better open more nicu's if this is where we're going.
www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.html?in_article_id=437236&in_page_id=1774 - feb 19, 2007
HillaryC, RN, CRNA
202 Posts
I couldn't get the above link to work, but was able to find the article. Maybe this link will work better:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.html?in_article_id=437236&in_page_id=1774
SteveNNP, MSN, NP
1 Article; 2,512 Posts
I'm glad for this family, but skeptical and dubious at the same time..... My understanding was that rudimentary alveoli didn't develop until the end of the 22nd week of gestation. Up until that point, all you have is non-ventilatable (sp?) terminal bronchioles. Either someone miscalculated their dates, or the UK has some way of ventilating 21 weekers effectively that we in the US haven't heard of. While some 22-23 weekers survive and do well, despite a long hospital course and various complications, the majority do not, and end up succumbing to infection or pulmonary death. Until we find a way to manage these 21 weekers, we need to carefully consider why we are doing this. Just because one survived, does this obligate the rest of the neonatal medical community to regularly attempt to resuscitate 21 weekers?
BittyBabyGrower, MSN, RN
1,823 Posts
Gotta agree with you Steve. And most likely this kiddo will have multiple long term problems. We follow up kids for 3 years and the few 22 weekers we have had that were "normal" at discharge aren't so great now.
I've not ever had a baby less than 23+2. She lived for six MISERABLE weeks and finally said "screw this!" and died (at least according to me, that's what happened) Never off HFOV, never off Dopamine, no arterial access. I cannot even fathom 21+6 weeks. Such gelatiny.
Jokerhill
172 Posts
This I believe this was in vitro so they know the date down to the time of day.
Spidey's mom, ADN, BSN, RN
11,305 Posts
That is my understanding too.
steph
dawngloves, BSN, RN
2,399 Posts
I wouldn't revise resuscitation guidlines for one baby.
I see her release has been delayed.
preemieRNkate, RN
385 Posts
I think I read in an article about this baby that she was 21+6 PCA, wouldn't that make her what we would actually call a 23+6 PMA? Would that make a difference in survival?
RN BSN 2009
1,289 Posts
That's way too early!
prmenrs, RN
4,565 Posts
http://apnews.myway.com//article/20070220/D8ND49N01.html
Baby is in Florida!
You know Kate, I think you're right! :uhoh21: