Published Apr 30, 2015
gouranga
144 Posts
Hello all,
I had an issue with a doctor at work today and I'm just looking for some advice.
My pt was admitted with pyelonephritis and spiked a temp of 103.1 today. I immediately put a call out to her doctor and got the nursing assistant to make a couple of ice packs to cool the pt down. The doctor was on the floor a minute later and I let him know what was going on. After berating me on my pronunciation of the word "pyelonephritis," he asked if I thought Rocephin was a pain medicine, then he went to see the pt.
The pt had an order for PO tylenol 650mg prn for pain 1-2/10. The order said NOTHING about tylenol in the case of a fever. Do I know tylenol is used to reduce fevers? Of course. But I was following the orders I had in front of me.
Anyway, this doctor made a huge deal and gave me loads of attitude for "sitting on" the tylenol order when I could have given it 20 minutes sooner. I'm just wondering.. was I wrong for not giving the tylenol right away?
I'm a new nurse. I've been off of orientation for a little over a month. In school we were taught to follow orders specifically. I even have a nurse friend who says if an order is for Tramadol for a pain scale of 1-5 and the pt says their pain is a 6, I cannot legally give Tramadol for that level of pain and I should get another order. Maybe that is extreme, but I am just trying to be a safe practitioner and protect my newnlicense.
enuf_already
789 Posts
You are correct. The order for Tylenol you had was for pain. Of course you know Tylenol can be effective for a fever, but the doctor did not order it that way.
If I recall, The Joint Commission is the governing body that cracked down on giving medication such as Tylenol and Motrin, only within the guidelines written. You had no orders for fever so you correctly called the doctor.
caliotter3
38,333 Posts
In the old days, some nurses would give the tylenol in those circumstances and get the order from the doctor after the fact. But those doctors cooperated. Nowadays, not a likely scenario. You are right. You need a viable order.
loving2024, BSN, RN
347 Posts
Well, I think you can use tylenol for mild pain and fever. I think the doctor was right about the order
hppygr8ful, ASN, RN, EMT-I
4 Articles; 5,186 Posts
with the exception of one doctor, all the doctor's at our LTC facility use a standing order of Tylenol 650mg for mild to moderate pain 1-5/10 or temp greater than 100 degrees. This order covers the bases for us and the doctors. That one doct will write 2 different orders.
akulahawkRN, ADN, RN, EMT-P
3,523 Posts
The order wasn't for fever, it was for 1-2/10 pain. While the med can be used for fever, without an order for it (protocol or otherwise), you technically could get in trouble for administering the med. That doc was probably angry/irritated and you just happened to be a convenient outlet. It wasn't you. He probably would have exploded and taken out half the floor had you replied something along the lines of "...then you should have written the med order to cover that because I'm not going to practice medicine without a license."
suanna
1,549 Posts
Would you rather get chewed out for giving Tylenol for temp and "masking" the patients fever. Why some docs want to see how high a temp will get before they treat it is a mystery to me- but I've been chewed out for both giving Tylenol and for following the order as written (for pain) and calling the temp. The correct answer is whatever you did- you are wrong-don't ever let it happen again. You can get snarky and instruct the doctor on proper parameters in the orders, or you can just do the best you can for your patient and try not to kill too many attendings- there is a doctor shortage in primary care and it gets worse when nurses kill too many of them.
Seaofclouds, BSN, RN
188 Posts
While Tylenol can be used for pain and fever, it must be ordered for both. If the order was strictly Tylenol for pain, the OP did not have an order to give the Tylenol for fever. If she gave it without the order specifically stating to give for fever, she would have been practicing medicine without a license and could get in big trouble. There is a huge push for proper indications on PRN medications and for these PRN medications to only be given with the specified indications.
OP, you did the right thing based on the orders you had at the time. Don't let this doctor get to you. Perhaps you can bring the issue up to your manager as a need for management to remind the doctor's of the need of proper indications for PRN medications.
morte, LPN, LVN
7,015 Posts
but suanna, the quality is better.....lol
I think part of the problem is the admitting nurse accepted this order.
ClaraRedheart, BSN, RN
363 Posts
Pyelonephritis hurts, at least a little bit... enough to give Tylenol. I'd have reassessed pain. Surely they were hurting a LITTLE bit, enough to give the Tylenol. You can notify the doctor after you've treated the "pain"/fever.
SwansonRN
465 Posts
Guy sounds like a pompous *not nice word*. I would have said something like 'hey this patient's febrile but their order for Tylenol needs to be adjusted because it's only written for pain." If he was rude in response he'd be asking for trouble :). There's no excuse for behavior like that.