Published
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/16/1157480905/spain-menstrual-leave-teen-abortion-trans-laws
QuoteThe abortion law builds on legislation passed in 2010 that represented a major shift for a traditionally Catholic country, transforming Spain into one of the most progressive countries in Europe on reproductive rights. Spain's constitutional court last week rejected a challenge by the right-wing Popular Party against allowing abortions in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy.
The debate will be heated in Spain, I imagine, as the conservative opposition pushes back. My daughter had horrible menstrual pain during her adolescence and young adulthood. I'm certain that she would have benefitted from that time.
heron said:You left out Jan. 6, the attack on Paul Pelosi, death threats against poll workers (and anyone else trump whines about), bomb threats galore in Springfield OH and on and on and on ...
Interesting that trump pulls this schtick just as he's being publicly criticized for the attempts to terrorize the community of Springfield and the legal immigrants who live there.
Projection is their favorite strategy and the average Trump voter is happy to project on every digital platform. They are useful to the fascists.
NRSKarenRN said:
It took MZ long enough . He can't decide whether to behave like a schmuck or a responsible business owner. He and Musk. Back and forth .
toomuchbaloney said:Telling lies is different than factual comparisons but I'm not surprised that you don't know that, and you feel differently. You feel like Trump is a victim of the left.
Can you show me the time that Harris or Biden shared an image of their political opponent hogtied in the back of a truck or encouraged rally voters to rough up protestors or suggested that police could be physically abusive with detainees or spoke about a bloodbath in the country if they don't get their way? That's just a few recent examples of inflammatory and violent rhetoric. Can you attach any of those to Harris or Biden?
When I compared Trump to other 20th century fascists it was the response from the right which suggested that such a comparison almost demanded assassination. It's like that violence is baked in to Trump the belief system. Now the right wants to project that propensity to think in term of violence onto others as the expected violence begins to increase.
Try again.
It doesn't suprise me that as per usual habit, you needed to use ad hominiem in order to deflect from the inability to provide sustenance to your claims. Such as your speculations about Trump .
Victim?
No former president or presidential candidate in history of the US has had x2 attempted assinations attempt within 9 weeks .
I'm sure you have some evidence to the contrary but you won't provide any.
I suppose that this is his fault? That's what the left propagandists are allotting. You seem to get the memos.
heron said:Ah, I heard that was the latest talking point. The first shooter is a registered republican who chose his victim with a Google search. The second is a known right-wingnut. Since when did either of those men listen to anything a democrat had to say?
Next ...
The first shooter was a registered republican but had not voted. He tried to blow Trump's head off, I'm sure he wasn't a MAGA.
The second is a currently registered Democrat, made several donations to Act Blue and voted for Trump in 2016.
It would seem your media hasn't informed you of this and it seems the same media and violent democrat rhetoric propaganda was successful in radicalizing these 2 terrorist to attempt to kill the former POTUS and presidential candidate.
What's the saying? "Propagandists works". ?
Crusades said:It doesn't suprise me that as per usual habit, you needed to use ad hominiem in order to deflect from the inability to provide sustience to your claims. Sucjmh as your speculations about Trump .
No former president or presidential candidate in history of the US has had x2 attempted assinations attempt with in 9 weeks .
I'm sure you have some evidence to the contrary but you won't provide any.
I suppose that this is his fault? That's what the left propagandists are allotting. You seem to get the memos.
All of this is poorly spelled and grammatically challenged baloney.
No former president or presidential candidate has ever been as intentionally divisive and reckless in their speech and actions as Trump. His angry and polarizing speech influences others in a country that has long embraced violence as a means to an end. I'm not going to ignore that reality because it causes cognitive dissonance for you.
Calm down and try again.
Crusades said:The first shooter was a registered republican but had not voted. He tried to blow Trump's head off, I'm sure he wasn't a MAGA.
The second is a currently registered Democrat, made several donations to Act Blue and voted for Trump in 2016.
It would seem your media hasn't informed you of this and it seems the same media and violent democrat rhetoric propaganda was successful in radicalizing these 2 terrorist to attempt to kill the former POTUS and presidential candidate.
What's the saying? "Propagandists works". ?
No, that's not the saying.
"Voted for Trump in 2016" but you believe that he's a liberal today because that's convenient for you even though the fellow most recently supported other conservative candidates in the primary.
Why not just admit that Trump is polarizing and inflamming the emotions of unstable people with his lies and craziness? The evidence is obvious and abundant.
toomuchbaloney said:All of this is poorly spelled and grammatically challenged baloney.
No former president or presidential candidate has ever been as intentionally divisive and reckless in their speech and actions as Trump. His angry and polarizing speech influences others in a country that has long embraced violence as a means to an end. I'm not going to ignore that reality because it causes cognitive dissonance for you.
Calm down and try again.
Yes. I went back and edited. Trump likes to throw insults, apparently you do as well.
No time in US history has a former POTUS and/or candidate had 2 attempts to end his life in 9 months.
You can never change that undisputed fact. However you can continue to throw insults and attempt to degrade people the way in which you call Trump out for.
toomuchbaloney said:No, that's not the saying.
"Voted for Trump in 2016" but you believe that he's a liberal today because that's convenient for you even though the fellow must recently supported other conservative candidates in the primary.
Why not just admit that Trump is polarizing and inflamming the emotions of unstable people with his lies and craziness? The evidence is obvious and ask abundant.
He is a liberal. Even the "n9n bias" left has to and has stated. The wannabe assassin son confirmed he hated Trump.
He voted for Trump in 2016. He then became radicalized by Democrat propaganda. So it worked indeed.
I do not tend to blame a victim for a crime made against them. I'd imagine you do not either. However the rules change in relation to Trump. That why this left radicalized terrorist tried to kill him. The democrats and left media feel it's appropriate to get the their constituents into a hysteria of the "2nd Hitler fascist that is a threat to our Democracy and needs to be stopped".
Or go silent when celebrities ask "when was the last an actor assisnated a president?" Hold up severed heads and make videos of themself shooting the POTUS in the end. The dems al silent about that.
The all time favorite. When a domestic terrorist radical Sanders supporter opened fire on a republican baseball team almost killing on republican irl5 was "suicide by cop".
Was is it going to take for you to admit the left are no longer the mostly peacful idols you seem to worship? A bullet to make contact with Trump's head?
toomuchbaloney said:No, that's not the saying.
"Voted for Trump in 2016" but you believe that he's a liberal today because that's convenient for you even though the fellow most recently supported other conservative candidates in the primary.
Why not just admit that Trump is polarizing and inflamming the emotions of unstable people with his lies and craziness? The evidence is obvious and abundant.
He can't because he's damage control intended to give trump cover after humiliating himself on prime time TV with his fantasy of fur baby eaters in Ohio, which led to dangerous attacks on schools, hospitals, legal and productive migrants - basically an entire community.
toomuchbaloney said:No, that's not the saying.
"Voted for Trump in 2016" but you believe that he's a liberal today because that's convenient for you even though the fellow most recently supported other conservative candidates in the primary.
Why not just admit that Trump is polarizing and inflamming the emotions of unstable people with his lies and craziness? The evidence is obvious and abundant.
Do I need to cite a source you will ignore or attack the source itself?
I would imagine a self acclaimed person with a " leg up" and skillful in propaganda would be unaware of this verified fact.
heron said:He can't because he's damage control intended to give trump cover after humiliating on prime time TV by his fantasy of fur baby eaters in Ohio, which led to dangerous attacks on schools, hospitals, legal productive migrants - basically an entire community.
And democrats are trying so hard to deflect the 2nd assassination attempt on a former POTUS and presidential candidate for the first time in history.
Doing overtime to get back the "Harris is a great debater" train that was derailed by this inconvenient event. And blaming Trump for almost being murdered the 2nd time.
heron, ASN, RN
4,666 Posts
You left out Jan. 6, the attack on Paul Pelosi, death threats against poll workers (and anyone else trump whines about), bomb threats galore in Springfield OH and on and on and on ...
Interesting that trump pulls this schtick just as he's being publicly criticized for the attempts to terrorize the community of Springfield and the legal immigrants who live there.