Stanford Rape

Published

I'm surprised there has been no mention of the Stanford rape trial and sentence on all nurses. I'm opening up the discussion as I feel it pertains to us in many ways. One as people who may have been victims or know others who have been victims of sexual violence and two as nurses that have taken care of others in this situation, whether directly in ER or a patient suffering from PTSD with other health problems as well.

I applaud the survivor's bravery and her impact statement that has gone public. I hope this will comfort other survivors, but even more I hope this will discourage rape in general. Campus rapes are common and rapes at frats are in the news frequently. Once again a college athlete got off with just a slap on the wrist, although I don't think he counted on all the negative publicity this case has garnered.

What disturbs me the most is the letters of the parents to the judge. The father's don't punish him for 20 minutes of action. Then the mother's letter, who by the way is a nurse for gynecological surgeries and in the past as a pediatric nurse, who had not one iota of empathy for the victim. Her letter simply astonished me. I can't believe as a woman, as a nurse, as a mother of a daughter she had no empathy for the victim! This troubles me the most! I imagine in her years as a nurse she must have taken care of a rape victim and her total lack of empathy for the victim disturbs me greatly!

What do the rest of you feel about this?

Possibly because his being clueless about fedoras and social constructs deflects from his accusatory statements toward rape victims, extreme attempts at vindicating rapists, and only showing any passion when male rape victims are mentioned.

You're right. I'm wasting my time.

You're right. I'm wasting my time.

Somehow this thread has devolved from decrying rape and rape apologists and is now almost exclusively devoted to someone who doesn't even have a lady parts.

(I'm not saying men don't get raped, I'm saying the OP was about man-on-woman rape.)

Someone who knows very well what we are trying to say but is trying to get us to agree with his views, which I believe are twisted and wrong.

Now this thread is about someone who didn't know the particulars of the case, who hasn't taken the time to investigate any of it, and who continually tries to portray the rapist and his apologists in a positive light. As if rape can be discussed away.

I believe that any further discussion with said person is not only pointless, but allows this person to inflict harm with the expression of his views. Especially to the posters who have experienced sexual violation.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with biology and everything to do with social constructs. There is absolutely zero biological influence on how people are socialized- the very word socialized means society, not biology.

he clearly stated they were socialized a certain way DO to their biology. don't corrupt a statement to make a point, it weakens your stand.

Possibly because his being clueless about fedoras and social constructs deflects from his accusatory statements toward rape victims, extreme attempts at vindicating rapists, and only showing any passion when male rape victims are mentioned.

I, too, have no clue what the fedora reference was, please explain.

Specializes in EMS, ED, Trauma, CEN, CPEN, TCRN.

I am closing this thread. I don't believe it is going to go anywhere constructive, and it's time.

+ Join the Discussion