Spiritual Competence, Religion and the Deep South

In the deep south, spirituality and religion are terms frequently used interchangeably. There are overlapping characteristics in both religion and spirituality, but they are defined differently. In order to provide spiritually competent care, it is important to understand your own views, as well as, the impact of community culture. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

I have worked all my 24-year nursing career in the state of Alabama. According to the Pew Research Center, Alabama is currently ranked as #1 (tied with Mississippi) as the most religious state in the U.S. Religion is a strong thread in the cultural fabric in this state and a key consideration in providing culturally competent nursing care. I considered religion and spirituality as interchangeable throughout many of my nursing years. In 2016, I found myself in spiritual distress eventually- leading to a deeper understanding of spiritually competent nursing care.

In May 2016, I checked into an inpatient facility for treatment of alcoholism. I don’t think anyone enters detox without having to experience a significant degree of negative life consequences- such as loss of job, relationships and sense of self. Through my drinking, I did a great job of isolating myself from all the people, places and things I held most dear. After 10 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, I realized I also lost my sense of spiritual connectedness. My treatment team would frequently to assess my spiritual condition by questions similar to these:

-Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?

-What is helping you through this experience?

-How do you express yourself spiritually?

-What personal spiritual goals do you hope to reach during treatment?

Important note: Our spiritual journey is unique to us- just as our patients’ spiritual journey is unique to them. The intent of this article is not to provide a “right or wrong” path to spirituality because it is different for every individual. To care for an individual in spiritual distress simply requires a nurse to support individuals in their own spiritual growth.

Prior to my spiritual crisis, I had inner laced religion and spirituality. I felt I was competent in supporting another’s spiritual needs but had little self-awareness of my own spirituality. I am certain living in a state where 53% of the population reports affiliation with a specific religion shaped my own perception of spirituality. In order to provide truly competent spiritual nursing care, I had to first understand the differences in religion and spirituality.

The Difference in Religion and Spirituality

Religion and spirituality are not the same, but the two often overlap. Spirituality reflects an interconnectedness with something bigger than ourselves and the search for life’s meaning. Christina Puchalski, MD, Director of the George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health defines spirituality as “the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature and to the significant or sacred”. Both religion and spirituality refer to the belief systems and philosophies of people and are often used in similar contexts. Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to an individual. However, an individual may be spiritual without affiliation to an organized religious system.

Characteristics of religion include:

A formal, organized system of beliefs with practices, activities and rituals to facilitate closeness to the sacred or transcendent.

  • Being a member of a group and following the teachings of others
  • Interconnectedness linked to church, temple, mosque, synagogue, etc.
  • Teaching and philosophies often based on the past
  • Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to a person

Characteristics of Spirituality:

  • A sense of relationship with believing in a power greater than ourselves
  • Subjective and individualistic
  • Spiritualism is a feature of the individual, not the group
  • About finding one’s own path
  • Inwardly directed
  • Less formal and emotionally oriented
  • Not authoritative
  • May be spiritual without affiliation with a religion

The Experience of Spiritual Distress

I experienced spiritual distress when I was unable to find sources of meaning, peace, strength and connectedness. I felt as if I was in a deep and dark hole and lost all hope I could get out.

I am now more aware when other individuals are having signs and symptoms of spiritual distress. A person may ask questions about the meaning of life, their belief system or pain and suffering. They may also suffer from feelings of sadness, depression, anxiety, anger and depression. A sense of isolation, emptiness and feeling alone is common with spiritual disconnect.

Meeting Spiritual Needs

It is important to be aware of your own spirituality to support another experiencing spiritual distress. As nurses, we must meet patients “where they are” and not where we think they should be. By projecting our own beliefs and ideas about where the patient should be spiritually, we could potentially inflict more suffering. This can be challenging for healthcare providers in a highly religious state or area. Here are a few guidelines when providing spiritual care:

Don’t assume you know what is best for the patient and do explore what or who can help in reconnecting (meditation, prayer, journaling, art, nature etc.)

  • Don’t give empty reassurances (“it will be alright”)
  • Don’t debate religion or impose your own views
  • Don’t try to “fix” your patient’s spiritual problems or answer “ unanswerable” questions
  • Actively listen to the patient
  • Ask “Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?
  • Ask “How do you express yourself spiritually and what is helping you through this experience”.

Do you think nurses fall short of addressing patients spiritual needs? Does the culture in your area impact the spiritual care you provide?

Additional Information:

Spiritual Distress Patient Education

2 hours ago, GrumpyRN said:

Again, you validate the profound difference of Christianity from every other human institution in history. Your anger and toxicity comes from your recognition that Christianity is different and atrocities committed in it's name is a desecration. Pol Pot, Stalin, North Korean despots seem not to be worthy of comment. But if a group uses Christianity as a rationale for murder, you rightfully criticize. Thanks!

56 minutes ago, offlabel said:

Again, you validate the profound difference of Christianity from every other human institution in history. Your anger and toxicity comes from your recognition that Christianity is different and atrocities committed in it's name is a desecration. Pol Pot, Stalin, North Korean despots seem not to be worthy of comment. But if a group uses Christianity as a rationale for murder, you rightfully criticize. Thanks!

My country of origin is Vietnam, which is a communist country.

Yes, communism is evil. That doesn't mean Christianity somehow deserves glorification.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_crisis

There you go. It happened in my country before I was born.

Sorry, Mr Catholic. Just because communism is evil does not mean your precious religion deserves my respect. I have lived with both sides, and I don't see much difference.

At best, Christianity is simply a lesser of the two evils.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
19 hours ago, offlabel said:

Again, you validate the profound difference of Christianity from every other human institution in history. Your anger and toxicity comes from your recognition that Christianity is different and atrocities committed in it's name is a desecration. Pol Pot, Stalin, North Korean despots seem not to be worthy of comment. But if a group uses Christianity as a rationale for murder, you rightfully criticize. Thanks!

"So, what is the atheist atrocities fallacy, really? It is little more than erroneous historical data wrapped in illogical argumentation and cloaked with the rhetorical garb of apologetic propaganda. Yet and still, above all of this inanity, the atheist atrocities fallacy is the result of a psychological defence mechanism, the aim of which is the distortion of reality for the protection of the hypersensitive religious ego.

Suppose the Christian apologist is correct, and atheist tyrants are worse than religious ones. What does this, from the point of view of the believer, show? What are the implications? On the one hand, you can interpret it to show that the more people believe in the Christian god, the more virtuous they will behave, despite the fact that the truth of history will laugh at such vacuous attempts to ignore its tomes of evidence to the contrary. On the other, what does it say about an all-powerful, all-knowing and all-loving god, one who allows tyrants, whether secular or religious, to murder helpless and innocent children by the millions, who turns a blind eye to the wrongful imprisonment of innocent men and women, and who starves to bare bones, the poor and meek?"

https://michaelsherlockauthor.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/the-atheist-atrocities-fallacy-hitler-stalin-pol-pot-in-memory-of-christopher-hitchens/

Specializes in Emergency Department.

Can I ask you to please stop, I have been doing this for a long time and I have enough quotes and writings from people who are a lot cleverer than I am to back up my position.

I have stated that I am not trying to change your mind - only you can change your mind - and I absolutely support your right to believe whatever you want. I am not tying to make this a battle or an argument. The original topic was about spirituality, there is nothing spiritual in this constant back and forth.

If you wish to debate religion versus atheism then feel free to start another thread on that subject.

Stay well.

ETA, Mods do you think this thread has run it's course?

Quote

If you wish to debate religion versus atheism then feel free to start another thread on that subject.

I never wanted to do that. I'm just answering the absurd bigotry leveled at Christians by people very comfortable in their ignorance about Christianity. Don't believe in God? Great for you. Carry on. But masquerading as being some kind of authority on Christianity in general and Christians in particular is a breathtaking level of hubris.

Thank you for the link. It was an interesting read.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
10 hours ago, offlabel said:

I never wanted to do that. I'm just answering the absurd bigotry leveled at Christians by people very comfortable in their ignorance about Christianity. Don't believe in God? Great for you. Carry on. But masquerading as being some kind of authority on Christianity in general and Christians in particular is a breathtaking level of hubris.

Thank you for the link. It was an interesting read.

That's what you're going with?

I am ignorant, bigoted and I am unsure how you mean "hubris." Do you mean it in its modern form or from Greek tragedy where "defiance of the gods leads to nemesis?"

Perhaps you missed the bit where I said I grew up in a christian family and went to church every week - this was in the 1950's to 1970's in Scotland where we actually learned stuff and did not just go through the motions. I am aware of history - and have given you reference after reference to show that I know what I am talking about - I grew up with god, Queen and empire. But according to you I am masquerading. What possible reason do you have for saying this?

While I don't agree with everything Vetpharmtech writes, did you not see the part where they stated they spent a year reading the bible to see exactly what was in it?

I have been unfailingly polite towards you and all I get back are your prejudices.

On 3/29/2019 at 6:07 AM, GrumpyRN said:

That's what you're going with?

I am ignorant, bigoted and I am unsure how you mean "hubris." Do you mean it in its modern form or from Greek tragedy where "defiance of the gods leads to nemesis?"

Perhaps you missed the bit where I said I grew up in a christian family and went to church every week - this was in the 1950's to 1970's in Scotland where we actually learned stuff and did not just go through the motions. I am aware of history - and have given you reference after reference to show that I know what I am talking about - I grew up with god, Queen and empire. But according to you I am masquerading. What possible reason do you have for saying this?

While I don't agree with everything Vetpharmtech writes, did you not see the part where they stated they spent a year reading the bible to see exactly what was in it?

I have been unfailingly polite towards you and all I get back are your prejudices.

Offlabel thinks that I have a bigoted view about Christianity. Look at the Christian in this clip. I don't see the difference between this Christian and Isis.

When I finished reading the bible, my concern finally comes to life. There are Christians who actually take their scriptures seriously to the point they will divorce themselves from their humanity to advocate barbarism against other humans. All of that is because they are obedient to their God.

Pastors Steven Anderson and Matt Powell are such examples. They take the bible way more seriously than any Christian here. Certainly, some people will say that they are not "true Christians".

And yet there are nurses like offlabel defending their holy book that advocates executing non believers. Ironically, these same nurses claim that their religious values are the best ones for a moral society. Seriously?

I know that humans compartmentalize. However, this level of mental gymnastic is something I never understand.

Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.

A Jehovah Witness knocked on my door yesterday. I usually tell them I'm Jewish (secular) and they go away. It infuriates me that people have to disrupt me to proslytize. I wanted to tell the school age child with her that I was so sorry that he was forced to be dragged around by his mother but my innate secular sense of fair play prevented me from causing any pain to a child. Religion is not the enemy - it's fundamental religiosity that has created the downside of religion. Instead of knocking on my door trying to give me your cheap, ugly handouts....do something useful to others who could use your time. Betsy DeVos personifies what happens when a very stupid person tries to push her religiosity on us taxpayers.

On 3/30/2019 at 12:42 PM, subee said:

A Jehovah Witness knocked on my door yesterday. I usually tell them I'm Jewish (secular) and they go away. It infuriates me that people have to disrupt me to proslytize. I wanted to tell the school age child with her that I was so sorry that he was forced to be dragged around by his mother but my innate secular sense of fair play prevented me from causing any pain to a child. Religion is not the enemy - it's fundamental religiosity that has created the downside of religion. Instead of knocking on my door trying to give me your cheap, ugly handouts....do something useful to others who could use your time. Betsy DeVos personifies what happens when a very stupid person tries to push her religiosity on us taxpayers.

If the United States of America has to become a theocratic state, I hope that Judaism will be the official religion. Even the most orthodox Jews (as far as I know) are all right with people not following 613 commandments or becoming Jews.

That is not the case with Christians. It is not okay not to follow the 10 commandments. You have perhaps seen how hard Christians fight to keep the 10 commandments monument in court and in school. Although they meet their challenge, they never stop making excuses about the USA constitution was founded under the 10 commandments.

If that was the case, you may be allowed to live and I would be killed. The first commandment is in direct contradiction to the first amendment. Clearly people like Betsy DeVos has the agenda to establish Christian theocracy. She even admitted that education activism and reform efforts as a means to advance God's Kingdom, whatever that means.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
On 3/30/2019 at 11:28 PM, vetpharmtech said:

If the United States of America has to become a theocratic state, I hope that Judaism will be the official religion. Even the most orthodox Jews (as far as I know) are all right with people not following 613 commandments or becoming Jews.

You may want to look at Hasidic and Haredi Jews.

https://www.thoughtco.com/hasidic-ultra-orthodox-judaism-2076297

If you want to see what a theocracy in the US would look like read "Christian Nation, a Novel" by Frederick C Rich or of course look at "The Handmaids Tale" by Margaret Atwood.

On 3/31/2019 at 6:59 AM, GrumpyRN said:

You may want to look at Hasidic and Haredi Jews.

https://www.thoughtco.com/hasidic-ultra-orthodox-judaism-2076297

If you want to see what a theocracy in the US would look like read "Christian Nation, a Novel" by Frederick C Rich or of course look at "The Handmaids Tale" by Margaret Atwood.

Thank you for your recommendation.

I checked Hasidic and Haredi Judaism. They look benign to me. Look at Israel. It is the most accepting place for LGBT people to live in the middle east.

I will be sad if Judaism dies before Christianity and Islam.

Specializes in CRNA, Finally retired.

And Judiasm does not prosletyze. IMHO, it's demeaning to people of an "other" religion that their religion is not good enough and they need to be changed before they are good enough for the people doing the prosletyzing.

Yes, Judiasm has a fundamentalist, insular population but they have no history of violence.

+ Add a Comment