Spiritual Competence, Religion and the Deep South

In the deep south, spirituality and religion are terms frequently used interchangeably. There are overlapping characteristics in both religion and spirituality, but they are defined differently. In order to provide spiritually competent care, it is important to understand your own views, as well as, the impact of community culture. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

I have worked all my 24-year nursing career in the state of Alabama. According to the Pew Research Center, Alabama is currently ranked as #1 (tied with Mississippi) as the most religious state in the U.S. Religion is a strong thread in the cultural fabric in this state and a key consideration in providing culturally competent nursing care. I considered religion and spirituality as interchangeable throughout many of my nursing years. In 2016, I found myself in spiritual distress eventually- leading to a deeper understanding of spiritually competent nursing care.

In May 2016, I checked into an inpatient facility for treatment of alcoholism. I don’t think anyone enters detox without having to experience a significant degree of negative life consequences- such as loss of job, relationships and sense of self. Through my drinking, I did a great job of isolating myself from all the people, places and things I held most dear. After 10 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, I realized I also lost my sense of spiritual connectedness. My treatment team would frequently to assess my spiritual condition by questions similar to these:

-Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?

-What is helping you through this experience?

-How do you express yourself spiritually?

-What personal spiritual goals do you hope to reach during treatment?

Important note: Our spiritual journey is unique to us- just as our patients’ spiritual journey is unique to them. The intent of this article is not to provide a “right or wrong” path to spirituality because it is different for every individual. To care for an individual in spiritual distress simply requires a nurse to support individuals in their own spiritual growth.

Prior to my spiritual crisis, I had inner laced religion and spirituality. I felt I was competent in supporting another’s spiritual needs but had little self-awareness of my own spirituality. I am certain living in a state where 53% of the population reports affiliation with a specific religion shaped my own perception of spirituality. In order to provide truly competent spiritual nursing care, I had to first understand the differences in religion and spirituality.

The Difference in Religion and Spirituality

Religion and spirituality are not the same, but the two often overlap. Spirituality reflects an interconnectedness with something bigger than ourselves and the search for life’s meaning. Christina Puchalski, MD, Director of the George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health defines spirituality as “the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature and to the significant or sacred”. Both religion and spirituality refer to the belief systems and philosophies of people and are often used in similar contexts. Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to an individual. However, an individual may be spiritual without affiliation to an organized religious system.

Characteristics of religion include:

A formal, organized system of beliefs with practices, activities and rituals to facilitate closeness to the sacred or transcendent.

  • Being a member of a group and following the teachings of others
  • Interconnectedness linked to church, temple, mosque, synagogue, etc.
  • Teaching and philosophies often based on the past
  • Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to a person

Characteristics of Spirituality:

  • A sense of relationship with believing in a power greater than ourselves
  • Subjective and individualistic
  • Spiritualism is a feature of the individual, not the group
  • About finding one’s own path
  • Inwardly directed
  • Less formal and emotionally oriented
  • Not authoritative
  • May be spiritual without affiliation with a religion

The Experience of Spiritual Distress

I experienced spiritual distress when I was unable to find sources of meaning, peace, strength and connectedness. I felt as if I was in a deep and dark hole and lost all hope I could get out.

I am now more aware when other individuals are having signs and symptoms of spiritual distress. A person may ask questions about the meaning of life, their belief system or pain and suffering. They may also suffer from feelings of sadness, depression, anxiety, anger and depression. A sense of isolation, emptiness and feeling alone is common with spiritual disconnect.

Meeting Spiritual Needs

It is important to be aware of your own spirituality to support another experiencing spiritual distress. As nurses, we must meet patients “where they are” and not where we think they should be. By projecting our own beliefs and ideas about where the patient should be spiritually, we could potentially inflict more suffering. This can be challenging for healthcare providers in a highly religious state or area. Here are a few guidelines when providing spiritual care:

Don’t assume you know what is best for the patient and do explore what or who can help in reconnecting (meditation, prayer, journaling, art, nature etc.)

  • Don’t give empty reassurances (“it will be alright”)
  • Don’t debate religion or impose your own views
  • Don’t try to “fix” your patient’s spiritual problems or answer “ unanswerable” questions
  • Actively listen to the patient
  • Ask “Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?
  • Ask “How do you express yourself spiritually and what is helping you through this experience”.

Do you think nurses fall short of addressing patients spiritual needs? Does the culture in your area impact the spiritual care you provide?

Additional Information:

Spiritual Distress Patient Education

Quote

In my opinion, the Bible is a messed up book. So is the Koran. Everything is about "context". I don't know which context allows god's people to stone someone to death because he picked up sticks on the Sabbath, which context allows parents to stone their disobedient children, which context allows people to kill homosexuals,.....

There is no authorization for Christians to do those things in scripture. The context there is Christ's establishing a church in the first century. There was a drastic departure in values and belief among the first Christians that included the value of women and children and care for the sick and poor. In the first 3 centuries, it was open season on Christians, so they were more focused on that than killing anyone else. Whatever crimes you can point to subsequent to that period, they were committed on the sociopolitical basis of the time. Christianity figured into that basis, but on a cultural power basis not an authentic religious one.

Quote

Jesus is the only way to god. Not believing in him = being burned in hell for eternity. That is another teaching.

That is demonstrably not a Catholic teaching. Catholicism does teach that there is no salvation outside of Jesus (God). That means if a pagan were "saved", and Catholics believe that is possible, he is saved through Jesus Christ, whether he'd know it or not.

Quote

Only Jesus can forgive sin. This is a prevalent teaching in American Christianity from my experience. Hence, it is possible that these priests sexually abused children and then asked for Jesus' forgiveness later because they really believed that.

Catholics identify this as 'presumption of the mercy of God'. It is something that Catholics are specifically warned against because these sins are not simply forgiven on the basis of a 'get out of jail free' mentality. As it would risk salvation, any priest would know that.

Quote

Based on the current situation in our country, I think Christians can do appalling things to other groups (either directly or through legislation) because their religion gives them a loophole for redemption, which creates excuses for their action.

Humans do appalling things to other people all of the time. And as far as any legislative efforts go, you'd be hard pressed to find any consensus among all Christians as to what is good or not. You'd also find agreement among Muslims, Christians and atheists in plenty of legislation that you would find objectionable. They might be outliers in their respective groups, or maybe not.

I think your for information on Christians has been limited to biased and agenda driven sources that don't have service to the truth at heart. Sorry for saying so, but you've made statements that have the vibe of a right wing Christian evangelical fundamentalist. You're just on the opposite side.

2 Votes
On 3/22/2019 at 6:01 PM, offlabel said:

There is no authorization for Christians to do those things in scripture. The context there is Christ's establishing a church in the first century. There was a drastic departure in values and belief among the first Christians that included the value of women and children and care for the sick and poor. In the first 3 centuries, it was open season on Christians, so they were more focused on that than killing anyone else. Whatever crimes you can point to subsequent to that period, they were committed on the sociopolitical basis of the time. Christianity figured into that basis, but on a cultural power basis not an authentic religious one.

That is demonstrably not a Catholic teaching. Catholicism does teach that there is no salvation outside of Jesus (God). That means if a pagan were "saved", and Catholics believe that is possible, he is saved through Jesus Christ, whether he'd know it or not.

Catholics identify this as 'presumption of the mercy of God'. It is something that Catholics are specifically warned against because these sins are not simply forgiven on the basis of a 'get out of jail free' mentality. As it would risk salvation, any priest would know that.

Humans do appalling things to other people all of the time. And as far as any legislative efforts go, you'd be hard pressed to find any consensus among all Christians as to what is good or not. You'd also find agreement among Muslims, Christians and atheists in plenty of legislation that you would find objectionable. They might be outliers in their respective groups, or maybe not.

I think your for information on Christians has been limited to biased and agenda driven sources that don't have service to the truth at heart. Sorry for saying so, but you've made statements that have the vibe of a right wing Christian evangelical fundamentalist. You're just on the opposite side.

Normally I don't trust the media unless I have a reason to do so. If I was never proselytized or never read the Bible, I would still believe that Christians are decent people inside out.

After I was told I deserved to be tortured for eternity simply because of my disbelief, I spent a year reading the Bible from cover to cover. When I closed your holy book, I came to the conclusion that compared to Yahweh, Hitler was an angel.

If you read the book of revelation, you can see how barbaric the Christian god is, much worse than ISIS.

You are free to think that I am the other side of the right wing fundamentalist. I don't take information just from the media. My suspicion of Christians is the result of my reading of the Bible. I am happy to change my mind if you can show me how I was wrong about the Bible.

Like I said in my earlier post, I simply showed the Christian who wanted to convert me what was in the bible, verse by verse. It was really clear that Yahweh commanded Moses and Joshua to slaughter the pagans including children. She believed it was right and just. She even told me that she would obey your God without a doubt by killing the Midianites per god's order.

Christians seem to show horror when a member of a different religion commits a terrorist act following his holy book's command from his god. And yet when they are shown exactly what happened in the bible, they come up with whatever excuse to justify the horrific act. One of the biggest excuses is that "you take those commandments out of context". The irony that Christians do not examine the context of other religions that make people commit atrocities.

This is why I no longer take Christians seriously with their moral teachings. They simply pick the good parts in the Bible, ignore the barbaric acts, and find apologetic resources to justify what is considered inhumane in our time.

These Christians do not simply believe in the Bible. They apply the biblical laws in our political system to theocracize our country. Right now everything seems to be under constitutional control, so slavery cannot be introduced back in the country, killing witches cannot be done, executing pagans cannot be permitted,.....

Think about it and let me know if I exaggerate anything in my statements. If you think that I was being unfair, I can show you the exact chapters in the Bible that prove what I said.

2 Votes
Specializes in Emergency Department.
On 3/22/2019 at 6:01 PM, offlabel said:

There is no authorization for Christians to do those things in scripture. The context there is Christ's establishing a church in the first century. There was a drastic departure in values and belief among the first Christians that included the value of women and children and care for the sick and poor. In the first 3 centuries, it was open season on Christians, so they were more focused on that than killing anyone else. Whatever crimes you can point to subsequent to that period, they were committed on the sociopolitical basis of the time. Christianity figured into that basis, but on a cultural power basis not an authentic religious one.

And where do the inquisitions and the Salem witch trials (as a couple of examples) fit into that?

1 Votes
On 3/23/2019 at 7:07 AM, GrumpyRN said:

And where do the inquisitions and the Salem witch trials (as a couple of examples) fit into that?

Indeed. This line of reasoning is the same as Islamic apologetic, right?

Whenever something good is done, it is because Christianity motivates people to be kind.

Whenever horrific acts are committed, it is because of social political motivation and people's sins.

Christians never takes responsibility for the bible. It is always someone else's faults. The bible is always the perfect book for moral guidance.

1 Votes
Quote

And where do the inquisitions and the Salem witch trials (as a couple of examples) fit into that?

For one thing these two things are not even remotely related and are standard canards for seemingly low hanging fruit to indict Christianity as a whole. It also betrays an ignorance of history. For example, part of the reasons for that sham persecution was anti-Catholic bigotry by other Christians. Are you saying that it was a legitimate expression of Christianity?

And the simple assessment of the inquisition from the context of 21st century perspective is pretty naive too. At that time and place, European secular jurisprudence of the day was incredibly brutal and it was very common for civil criminals to apostatize just to come under the jurisdiction of the Inquisition and the far more merciful (for the day) judgements. The Inquisition was also the only civil authority in many places and was responsible for the adjudication of civil crimes as well. And it was on that system that much of our legal system today is based.

2 Votes
Specializes in Emergency Department.
On 3/23/2019 at 4:38 PM, offlabel said:

For one thing these two things are not even remotely related and are standard canards for seemingly low hanging fruit to indict Christianity as a whole. It also betrays an ignorance of history. For example, part of the reasons for that sham persecution was anti-Catholic bigotry by other Christians. Are you saying that it was a legitimate expression of Christianity?

And the simple assessment of the inquisition from the context of 21st century perspective is pretty naive too. At that time and place, European secular jurisprudence of the day was incredibly brutal and it was very common for civil criminals to apostatize just to come under the jurisdiction of the Inquisition and the far more merciful (for the day) judgements. The Inquisition was also the only civil authority in many places and was responsible for the adjudication of civil crimes as well. And it was on that system that much of our legal system today is based.

OK, so you are not going to answer me just reproduce the same old twaddle.

Goodbye!

1 Votes
On 3/24/2019 at 4:23 PM, GrumpyRN said:

OK, so you are not going to answer me just reproduce the same old twaddle.

Goodbye!

That is Catholic apologetic, which is making the argument "the church may do bad things, but other groups have done worse", as if that is a good reason to believe in Christianity.

What can you expect from an apologist?

2 Votes
3 hours ago, GrumpyRN said:

OK, so you are not going to answer me just reproduce the same old twaddle.

Goodbye!

I bet it's not 'goodbye' at all...anyway, I didn't give you an answer to validate your biased pretense so you became (more) toxic and retreated.

2 Votes
Specializes in Emergency Department.
On 3/24/2019 at 8:19 PM, offlabel said:

I bet it's not 'goodbye' at all...anyway, I didn't give you an answer to validate your biased pretense so you became (more) toxic and retreated.

It was goodbye to you, not to me.

It is not 'pretence', I am not 'toxic', I am not 'retreated' and I certainly do not need to be validated by some bronze age mythology.

Since you don't seem to believe that slavery (justified by the christian bible), slaughter of innocent women and men in Salem (justified by the christian bible) or slaughter of people who were "heretics" (justified by the christian bible) are not related perhaps I should bring it closer to the present.

Catholic priests are renowned for child molestation - yes not all of them - but the church hides the ones who are and moves them when it gets too embarrassing. (For reference see any recent newspaper or news report.

Mother Teresa who the church made a saint who has been proven to be abusive and evil. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa

Before you reply, please bear in mind that I grew up in a christian religious family. I went to church regularly. I had many friends who are catholic - we would walk to school together - so I understand the ethos. I also understand the fear of schoolchildren afraid to go to school on Monday morning because the priest or nun in the school would beat them because they had not gone to chapel the previous day.

Or this little snippet;

https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/news/local/inquiry-hears-nun-told-boy-he-was-garbage/

And as a finale.... You really need to look into the history of Catholicism and Protestantism in the UK and understand that I grew up with that history.

1 Votes
On 3/25/2019 at 7:44 AM, GrumpyRN said:

It was goodbye to you, not to me.

It is not 'pretence', I am not 'toxic', I am not 'retreated' and I certainly do not need to be validated by some bronze age mythology.

Since you don't seem to believe that slavery (justified by the christian bible), slaughter of innocent women and men in Salem (justified by the christian bible) or slaughter of people who were "heretics" (justified by the christian bible) are not related perhaps I should bring it closer to the present.

Catholic priests are renowned for child molestation - yes not all of them - but the church hides the ones who are and moves them when it gets too embarrassing. (For reference see any recent newspaper or news report.

Mother Teresa who the church made a saint who has been proven to be abusive and evil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa

Before you reply, please bear in mind that I grew up in a christian religious family. I went to church regularly. I had many friends who are catholic - we would walk to school together - so I understand the ethos. I also understand the fear of schoolchildren afraid to go to school on Monday morning because the priest or nun in the school would beat them because they had not gone to chapel the previous day.

Or this little snippet;

https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/news/local/inquiry-hears-nun-told-boy-he-was-garbage/

And as a finale.... You really need to look into the history of Catholicism and Protestantism in the UK and understand that I grew up with that history.

Don't waste your time with offlabel. There is no point arguing with Catholic apologist, especially not Christian apologist nurses. These healthcare professionals spend tons of time defending an ideology that attacks the core of humanity that makes us who we are instead of treating religion as a mean for patients to better their health.

I don't know why people like offlabel don't work in Christian ministry.

All these Christian apologetic posts from Christian nurses make me suspicious of their actual motive when they choose this noble profession. The more I see them, the more it becomes clear to me that these Christians become a nurse simply because they need to spread their religion, implicitly or in your face. It's never about patients. It's all about their religious ideology.

2 Votes

So all of this toxic hostility is completely understandable. It comes from a recognition that what should be a beautiful reality has been scandalously betrayed and desecrated. The message of Christianity is one of peace, mercy and forgiveness and it has been defiled by evil many times over the last 2 millennia.

Your anger is just validation of the truth of Christianity. You feel a sense of outrage because on a profound level you recognize what the grave insult to all humanity that the desecration of Christianity really is.

You're an American. For all of the land of the free, home of the brave stuff, this country has committed breathtaking atrocities. But me pointing this out is just some Christian deflecting blame to some other, less important group. And you'd be right when you say that, because Christ (God) himself established Christianity. So your outrage at the desecration of Christ's church is rightfully orders of magnitude greater than the desecration of the values of some nation.

So...you're right.

1 Votes
On 3/25/2019 at 7:25 PM, offlabel said:

So all of this toxic hostility is completely understandable. It comes from a recognition that what should be a beautiful reality has been scandalously betrayed and desecrated. The message of Christianity is one of peace, mercy and forgiveness and it has been defiled by evil many times over the last 2 millennia.

Your anger is just validation of the truth of Christianity. You feel a sense of outrage because on a profound level you recognize what the grave insult to all humanity that the desecration of Christianity really is.

You're an American. For all of the land of the free, home of the brave stuff, this country has committed breathtaking atrocities. But me pointing this out is just some Christian deflecting blame to some other, less important group. And you'd be right when you say that, because Christ (God) himself established Christianity. So your outrage at the desecration of Christ's church is rightfully orders of magnitude greater than the desecration of the values of some nation.

So...you're right.

The only religion that is completely peaceful and nonviolent is Jainism. A Jain extremist would simply let himself die so that other beings won't be hurt by his unintentional harm. I cannot say the same about a Christian extremist or a Muslim extremist. Even a Buddhist extremist can do appalling things, too. I have to face that fact even though I grew up in that tradition. I don't think you do, but that is your business to sort it out with your church and your Pope. Those figures are not my authority, not mentioning the action from your church does not reflect what you said.

1 Votes
+ Add a Comment