Spiritual Competence, Religion and the Deep South

In the deep south, spirituality and religion are terms frequently used interchangeably. There are overlapping characteristics in both religion and spirituality, but they are defined differently. In order to provide spiritually competent care, it is important to understand your own views, as well as, the impact of community culture. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

I have worked all my 24-year nursing career in the state of Alabama. According to the Pew Research Center, Alabama is currently ranked as #1 (tied with Mississippi) as the most religious state in the U.S. Religion is a strong thread in the cultural fabric in this state and a key consideration in providing culturally competent nursing care. I considered religion and spirituality as interchangeable throughout many of my nursing years. In 2016, I found myself in spiritual distress eventually- leading to a deeper understanding of spiritually competent nursing care.

In May 2016, I checked into an inpatient facility for treatment of alcoholism. I don’t think anyone enters detox without having to experience a significant degree of negative life consequences- such as loss of job, relationships and sense of self. Through my drinking, I did a great job of isolating myself from all the people, places and things I held most dear. After 10 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, I realized I also lost my sense of spiritual connectedness. My treatment team would frequently to assess my spiritual condition by questions similar to these:

-Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?

-What is helping you through this experience?

-How do you express yourself spiritually?

-What personal spiritual goals do you hope to reach during treatment?

Important note: Our spiritual journey is unique to us- just as our patients’ spiritual journey is unique to them. The intent of this article is not to provide a “right or wrong” path to spirituality because it is different for every individual. To care for an individual in spiritual distress simply requires a nurse to support individuals in their own spiritual growth.

Prior to my spiritual crisis, I had inner laced religion and spirituality. I felt I was competent in supporting another’s spiritual needs but had little self-awareness of my own spirituality. I am certain living in a state where 53% of the population reports affiliation with a specific religion shaped my own perception of spirituality. In order to provide truly competent spiritual nursing care, I had to first understand the differences in religion and spirituality.

The Difference in Religion and Spirituality

Religion and spirituality are not the same, but the two often overlap. Spirituality reflects an interconnectedness with something bigger than ourselves and the search for life’s meaning. Christina Puchalski, MD, Director of the George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health defines spirituality as “the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature and to the significant or sacred”. Both religion and spirituality refer to the belief systems and philosophies of people and are often used in similar contexts. Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to an individual. However, an individual may be spiritual without affiliation to an organized religious system.

Characteristics of religion include:

A formal, organized system of beliefs with practices, activities and rituals to facilitate closeness to the sacred or transcendent.

  • Being a member of a group and following the teachings of others
  • Interconnectedness linked to church, temple, mosque, synagogue, etc.
  • Teaching and philosophies often based on the past
  • Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to a person

Characteristics of Spirituality:

  • A sense of relationship with believing in a power greater than ourselves
  • Subjective and individualistic
  • Spiritualism is a feature of the individual, not the group
  • About finding one’s own path
  • Inwardly directed
  • Less formal and emotionally oriented
  • Not authoritative
  • May be spiritual without affiliation with a religion

The Experience of Spiritual Distress

I experienced spiritual distress when I was unable to find sources of meaning, peace, strength and connectedness. I felt as if I was in a deep and dark hole and lost all hope I could get out.

I am now more aware when other individuals are having signs and symptoms of spiritual distress. A person may ask questions about the meaning of life, their belief system or pain and suffering. They may also suffer from feelings of sadness, depression, anxiety, anger and depression. A sense of isolation, emptiness and feeling alone is common with spiritual disconnect.

Meeting Spiritual Needs

It is important to be aware of your own spirituality to support another experiencing spiritual distress. As nurses, we must meet patients “where they are” and not where we think they should be. By projecting our own beliefs and ideas about where the patient should be spiritually, we could potentially inflict more suffering. This can be challenging for healthcare providers in a highly religious state or area. Here are a few guidelines when providing spiritual care:

Don’t assume you know what is best for the patient and do explore what or who can help in reconnecting (meditation, prayer, journaling, art, nature etc.)

  • Don’t give empty reassurances (“it will be alright”)
  • Don’t debate religion or impose your own views
  • Don’t try to “fix” your patient’s spiritual problems or answer “ unanswerable” questions
  • Actively listen to the patient
  • Ask “Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?
  • Ask “How do you express yourself spiritually and what is helping you through this experience”.

Do you think nurses fall short of addressing patients spiritual needs? Does the culture in your area impact the spiritual care you provide?

Additional Information:

Spiritual Distress Patient Education

On 3/8/2019 at 9:08 AM, subee said:

You can tell that "those people" that the Code of Hammurabi existed hundreds of years before the laws of Moses and his laws are actually predicated on the previous secular code. The only thing he added differently was the mention of a God and added the twist of monotheism. People needed ethics and laws as soon as people started to settle in cities....they didn't have the time to wait for Moses:)

So who did Hammurabi copy his code from? Laws of this type existed centuries before his. And the Mosaic law included forgiveness and mercy which was no where in the C of H. That there was a recognition of the Natural Law by human beings (then and now) is no kind of indictment on the validity of the Mosaic law...so...what's yer point exactly?

On 3/17/2019 at 10:46 PM, offlabel said:

So who did Hammurabi copy his code from? Laws of this type existed centuries before his. And the Mosaic law included forgiveness and mercy which was no where in the C of H. That there was a recognition of the Natural Law by human beings (then and now) is no kind of indictment on the validity of the Mosaic law...so...what's yer point exactly?

Her answer is to help SafetyNurse1968 deal with her Christian classmate who questioned her view about morality. I don't understand why you had to wear your apologetic hat in this conversation.

Besides, there are cultures and religions that had existed long before the Old testament was constructed.

Do you really believe that those society did not understand the concept of forgiveness and mercy before Moses supposedly received them from Yahweh?

You are lucky that I am not a Hindu. Otherwise, I am going to blast your apologetic messages out of the earth with the Veda's teaching about forgiveness.

Remember your bible is not the oldest book in the history of religion.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
On 3/15/2019 at 10:14 PM, vetpharmtech said:

No problem. I am not an atheist, but I like to be around atheists. Christians, including the ones in health care profession, have too many privileges they don't deserve.

It is wonderful that you stand your ground as an atheist nurse. One of my colleagues is an atheist vet technician, a highly skilled and compassionate professional who cares about everyone around her. It is time for us, non-Christian health care professionals, to push back at Christian physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, therapists,... and declare affirmative statement "enough is enough. You do not own moral high ground in patient care."

What type of privileges do you think that Christians have that you don't that you feel the need to push back at.

On 3/18/2019 at 12:03 AM, vetpharmtech said:

Her answer is to help SafetyNurse1968 deal with her Christian classmate who questioned her view about morality. I don't understand why you had to wear your apologetic hat in this conversation.

Besides, there are cultures and religions that had existed long before the Old testament was constructed.

Do you really believe that those society did not understand the concept of forgiveness and mercy before Moses supposedly received them from Yahweh?

You are lucky that I am not a Hindu. Otherwise, I am going to blast your apologetic messages out of the earth with the Veda's teaching about forgiveness.

Remember your bible is not the oldest book in the history of religion.

Well, thanks for not blasting me. I appreciate your restraint.

I've come to understand that you're less interested in what some people have to say and what they think than arguing polemics and "winning". That said, and I write this for anyone sincerely interested, all of those ancient moral codes speak to an innate hardwiring of the Natural Law that transcends culture and time. If Exodus or the C of H never existed or whatever code Hindus or Buddhists or Native Americans have never existed, variations on the same themes would have come along sooner or later because human beings have in our DNA a recognition of objective right and wrong. It gets corrupted along the way, but the principle is there and strong.

6 hours ago, offlabel said:

Well, thanks for not blasting me. I appreciate your restraint.

I've come to understand that you're less interested in what some people have to say and what they think than arguing polemics and "winning". That said, and I write this for anyone sincerely interested, all of those ancient moral codes speak to an innate hardwiring of the Natural Law that transcends culture and time. If Exodus or the C of H never existed or whatever code Hindus or Buddhists or Native Americans have never existed, variations on the same themes would have come along sooner or later because human beings have in our DNA a recognition of objective right and wrong. It gets corrupted along the way, but the principle is there and strong.

It is my bad. I apologize for my hastiness. I was on my break reading your comment. I did not look at it carefully.

You are correct. I believe that compassion and empathy are innate in people. They transcend society and culture although I think there are exceptions when it comes to in group and out group.

On 3/18/2019 at 3:08 PM, Daisy4RN said:

What type of privileges do you think that Christians have that you don't that you feel the need to push back at.

It is not that I don't have the rights that Christians have by the nature of their existence. It is that I will not have them without fighting them. It is also whatever they say is considered wise and good without people examining the intent of their sayings.

Apparently, thoughts and prayers are considered over action to help people. Nobody questions him.

https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/missouri-lawmakers-approve-bible-class-in-public-schools

I thought our country was founded on the principle of religious freedom. Since when a state representative is allowed to impose his faith on other groups? What about non Christian faiths?

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/islam-is-something-that-does-need-to-be-stopped-bryan-fischer-empathizes-with-new-zealands-mosque-shooter/

This man justified the shooting because he thinks Islam needed to be stopped with vigilante action. Why do I not hear other religions talk that way?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/world/australia/george-pell-sentence.html

The man of god is apparently favored with a light sentence.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-says-the-synagogue-of-satan-is-crapping-on-the-country/

Demonizing Judaism seems to be a Christian fashion nowadays. Who pushes back at them?

An organization that has been committing crime for decades has the audacity to demand apology, and yet it prides itself in teaching Christian morals.

https://news.wjct.org/post/jacksonville-reps-bill-mandating-public-school-bible-courses-advances-florida-house

Once again, the Bible gains privileges over other sacred texts.

https://wildhunt.org/2011/08/religions-role-in-custody-battles.html

A pagan mom has fear of losing custody of her kid because of her religious belief.

https://christiannews.net/2016/11/04/hindus-to-push-for-monkey-king-statue-if-oklahoma-votes-to-allow-ten-commandments-monument/

Obviously freedom of religion = freedom of protestant Christianity. I don't remember our country being a Christian theocracy when I studied for my citizenship exam.

I have a lot more if you want to see. Since you are the in group, you don't see it. When these things happen, I am sensitive to the incidents. Luckily I am living in California. Had I lived where you are living, who knows what bigotry from Christians I would have to deal with.

This is not simply a bad action from a bad Christian. These people follow the bible literally for their conviction. Their faith is regarded as a virtue; therefore, people like me would be expendable without pushing back at Christians.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.

I think that you misunderstand Christianity. Christians are followers of Jesus and yes of course follow the Bible and believe that what it says is correct, wise and good, that is their faith! Christians know that praying to God can change outcomes, behaviors, situations, attitudes etc.; so yes, offering thoughts and prayers is a way to help people cope/deal with a difficult situation and a loving thing to do.

This is no different from other people of differing religions/beliefs following their ‘sacred texts’.

I am sure that you could find more examples to share just as I could also provide examples of the bigotry and demonization of Christians for their beliefs, and some that have paid a hefty price for seemingly minor infractions that 50 years ago nobody would bat an eye at.

We do live in a country where people are free to worship whoever/whatever they choose. You will find good and bad people in all those groups because we are still all human beings and therefore subject to our human sinful natures; some more than others, some not able to control their impulses etc. This should not be used to paint all people of one religion in a bad light, whether Christian, Jew, Islam, or Buddhist etc. I think that most people realize this but there are those who will demonize an entire faith based on the sensationalized things they see/hear/read etc. especially in this politically polarized/charged time in our country. The man you talk about (the New Zealand shooter) stated that he purposefully did that because he wanted to cause racial/political divides within our country. That is just incredible to me that someone from a different country would want to do this, that should scare us all and make us all think. I also think that our politicians, including the President, should speak out more on hate crimes like this.

This country was founded on religious freedom, meaning you are free to choose/worship whoever you want. It was not meant to not have Bibles, 10 Commandments plaques etc. excluded from schools, Gov. buildings etc., hence that is the way it was done in the past and why some are there. Our society has been moving away from that for years. People will, and are allowed, to have differing opinions about that. We should all be able to come together and find a solution meeting in the middle somewhere. But unfortunetly our politicians and news media seem to do just the opposite, either intentionally or unintentionally dividing people with their sensationalism and bias reporting of such stories. IMO, it is not helpful to our society as a whole.

I am still not sure what privilege you think Christians have or why you think that Christians think you are “expendable”. I have been a Christian my entire life so I know and have been around many other Christians and I assure you I have never met any who feel that non-Christians are expendable. Most I know believe as I do that you are free to make your own choice whether to be a Christian or not, Jesus is a true gentleman and will not force himself on anyone. “I stand at the door and knock…” (Rev 3:20).

And in this country all are privileged because all can worship whoever/whatever they want , or not believe/worship anything. Not all countries can say that.

Quote

An organization that has been committing crime for decades has the audacity to demand apology, and yet it prides itself in teaching Christian morals.

Some stuff to unpack there...so, what organization? Who is the leader, the executive leadership? In what city is the head quarters? And you juxtapose the paradox of committing crime and Christian morals. Is this to say that the two are in opposition to one another? Is this the source of the paradox?

Could you be criticizing those that live and act in contradiction to whatever Christian morals you have in mind? Are you saying that contradicting Christian morals is wrong?

Well, then....seems as though we agree. But what about those that commit crime that are not contradicting their own moral code. What do you say about them?

Quote

I think that you misunderstand Christianity. Christians are followers of Jesus and yes of course follow the Bible and believe that what it says is correct, wise and good, that is their faith! Christians know that praying to God can change outcomes, behaviors, situations, attitudes etc.; so yes, offering thoughts and prayers is a way to help people cope/deal with a difficult situation and a loving thing to do.

That is the privilege right there. You are the majority, so you can throw "I'll pray for you" at someone who is not a member of your faith without them saying anything back.

In this interview, it shows very clearly the Christian privilege. The interviewer just assumed that the lady was a Christian.

Since you are a Christian, please explain to me what makes Christians in this country assume other people's religious identity? This journalist did not even ask which religion Rebecca followed. He just assumed that she was a Christian.

No other religious person ever did that to me. Only Christians do. That is the privilege.

Quote

This country was founded on religious freedom, meaning you are free to choose/worship whoever you want. It was not meant to not have Bibles, 10 Commandments plaques etc. excluded from schools, Gov. buildings etc., hence that is the way it was done in the past and why some are there. Our society has been moving away from that for years.

I never say that the Bible or 10 commandments monument should be excluded from schools. I was talking about Christian hypocrisy. If our country was founded on religious freedom, why can't Hindus have their Hanuman statue in school if they can fund it themselves? Why can't the Baghavad Gita taught in school like the Bible? Why can't Buddhist 8 fold path monument stay in the public place like the 10 commandment monument?

Did you check the article about what happened in Oklahoma city?

Quote

People will, and are allowed, to have differing opinions about that. We should all be able to come together and find a solution meeting in the middle somewhere. But unfortunetly our politicians and news media seem to do just the opposite, either intentionally or unintentionally dividing people with their sensationalism and bias reporting of such stories. IMO, it is not helpful to our society as a whole.

I want to trust your intention. However, I am skeptical with your "meeting in the middle" solution. How are we going to do that?

Let's take the Lord's prayer as an example.

I totally support a teacher guiding his students to cite this prayer when he happens to be in charge of his class on a specific day.

However, if a teacher wants to guide his students to sit in a lotus position and mediate for a few minutes, he should be given that option.

If a teacher wants to guide his students to chant Hare Krishna, he should be given that option.

If a teacher wants to guide his students to invoke Gaia for blessing on the Earth, he should be given that option.

This is an example of true freedom of expression and religion in my view.

How many Christians do you think will allow these options to happen?

I think the media is simply fuel added to the fire. It cannot create fire out of thin air. This is not a communist country. People are not stupid; they can evaluate information on their own. My view about Christians is not based on the media. Reading the Bible plus my interaction with Christians form my low opinion of them.

Quote

I am still not sure what privilege you think Christians have or why you think that Christians think you are “expendable”. I have been a Christian my entire life so I know and have been around many other Christians and I assure you I have never met any who feel that non-Christians are expendable. Most I know believe as I do that you are free to make your own choice whether to be a Christian or not, Jesus is a true gentleman and will not force himself on anyone. “I stand at the door and knock…” (Rev 3:20).

I don't want to debate with you about Jesus. I read Revelation carefully. It does not illustrate Jesus as a nice peace-loving deity as Christians claim. Whenever I bring up the whole chapters without omitting any verse, there is always justification for the horrific acts that Jesus (according to apostle John's vision) would do or command his angels to do. Arguing about the nature of Jesus is a complete waste of time. Feel free to believe in him. Just do not expect me to see Jesus the same way you do when I read the same book as you do.

Quote

And in this country all are privileged because all can worship whoever/whatever they want , or not believe/worship anything. Not all countries can say that.

I don't believe this is true in all 50 states. Why do I always see a cross on the memorial day of September 11? Were all those innocents who lost their lives Christians?

In the example I gave you, when is the last time you heard a state representative promote an Upanishads course for elective credit? Where is the religious freedom to the students when only the bible is mandated?

I lived in a communist country before I came here. The USA is a wonderful country. However, with the rise of Christian theocrats, I feel like the greatness of our nation is going downhill, and there is a possibility that America would become a Christian state. I feel at ease because people from Freedom From Religion Foundation work their butts off to push back at Christians so that Roy Moore's prophecy will not come true.

https://abovethelaw.com/2014/05/chief-justice-says-1st-amendment-applies-only-to-christians-and-other-stupid-stuff/

Do I exaggerate anything?

What is scary is that you are not only complacent about it. You actually believe it is a good thing to mandate "Christian values" on all citizens. That is not fair to non Christian citizens. I have shared values with Christians, but I don't have Christian values. I don't expect you to give up your religion, but I do hope you stay neutral with religious issue like this.

Apparently, even you, a nice Christian in general, want Christianity to be the ethos of the government, then how can I trust other Christians who may have theocratic agenda in their mind?

On 3/19/2019 at 9:45 PM, offlabel said:

Some stuff to unpack there...so, what organization? Who is the leader, the executive leadership? In what city is the head quarters? And you juxtapose the paradox of committing crime and Christian morals. Is this to say that the two are in opposition to one another? Is this the source of the paradox?

Could you be criticizing those that live and act in contradiction to whatever Christian morals you have in mind? Are you saying that contradicting Christian morals is wrong?

Well, then....seems as though we agree. But what about those that commit crime that are not contradicting their own moral code. What do you say about them?

The Catholic church of course. What else do you think I have in mind?

I heard about this child abuse back in 2005. I had positive experience with Catholics in the past before I immigrated to the USA. As an outsider of Catholicism, I always had respect for the faith and its people. Things started to change when a Vietnamese priest told his people to pray for Catholic priests not to commit crimes against minors. I did not know what that was about. Year after year, this scandal became bigger and bigger to the point I cannot avoid seeing it. When I dialed back to the history of Catholic in Vietnam ever since Ngo Dinh Diem's Catholic family was in charge of the country, I found out all the news about sexual abuse toward children and affair among priests and nuns is actually true.

These things have an ugly history and now people start to speak up. That is why I know and I have lost my respect for Catholicism since I learned about what happened in my country and in America. Plus, reading the Bible helps me realize the crime Catholic priests have done to children is just a fraction of what Christians are capable of doing. Living in this country with outspoken atheists and people from other faiths helps me see Christians' incredibly dark side that I never knew before.

About morality, I remember talking to this Christian when I was in college. She wanted to convert me into her faith. I brought up the slaughter of the Midianites in Numbers 31. I asked her if she thought that action was right and just. She responded with a confidence yes. I asked her again if killing everyone and keeping virgins were right and just; she answered without reluctance yes. According to her, an act is totally moral regardless of how heinous it is as long as god commanded it.

Then I asked her if she would stone me to death when god gave her the order because I am gay, she answered with a confidence yes.

Since then, I had found another seat to stay away from her. People with that "divine command theory" are capable to doing things that a decent human would never do.

To answer your question, I think Christians can come up with whatever justification that suits their interpretation of the biblical morals. It is hard for me to know what is in their head when they love a book like the bible.

I don't know about you, but I would be very nervous if a nurse with this thinking takes care of me. Who knows what is going on in her mind when she found out I fit in "abomination category" according to the Bible.

I'm not sure at all that you know that there are many different faith traditions within Christianity. You identify the Catholic Church as the chief Christian tradition, and most Catholics would agree with you, but you don't give the impression in your comments that you draw any distinction at all between the different groups. But ignorance is the largest element of bigotry.

That said, the members of the Catholic Church have committed terrible acts over the 20 centuries of it's existence. Especially when viewed from our 21st century point of view. What you're correctly identifying and criticizing is the betrayal of the teachings of historic Christianity. You're also validating those teachings by condemning those that have betrayed them. Predatory sexual behavior isn't taught in any legitimate Christian tradition, let alone Catholicism.

But my question to you is, do you think those people betrayed those teachings because they were Christian or despite their being Christian?

On 3/20/2019 at 9:53 PM, offlabel said:

I'm not sure at all that you know that there are many different faith traditions within Christianity. You identify the Catholic Church as the chief Christian tradition, and most Catholics would agree with you, but you don't give the impression in your comments that you draw any distinction at all between the different groups. But ignorance is the largest element of bigotry.

That said, the members of the Catholic Church have committed terrible acts over the 20 centuries of it's existence. Especially when viewed from our 21st century point of view. What you're correctly identifying and criticizing is the betrayal of the teachings of historic Christianity. You're also validating those teachings by condemning those that have betrayed them. Predatory sexual behavior isn't taught in any legitimate Christian tradition, let alone Catholicism.

But my question to you is, do you think those people betrayed those teachings because they were Christian or despite their being Christian?

In my opinion, the Bible is a messed up book. So is the Koran. Everything is about "context". I don't know which context allows god's people to stone someone to death because he picked up sticks on the Sabbath, which context allows parents to stone their disobedient children, which context allows people to kill homosexuals,.....

Although I am not a Hindu, there is less ambiguity when I read the Baghavad Gita or the Upanishads. I may need to know history to understand the teachings more deeply, but I don't remember seeing any allowance for killing groups that do not obey Hindu laws.

Accordingly, I don't have a good answer to your question. Yahweh in the Old testament commanded his prophet Moses to tell his soldiers to kill everyone including children and keep all the girls who did not know men. I don't think Catholic priests fit in that scenario. However, I cannot say they betrayed Christian teachings, either. There is no single Christian teaching I know of.

Loving god and neighbor as yourself is one teaching.

Jesus is the only way to god. Not believing in him = being burned in hell for eternity. That is another teaching.

Only Jesus can forgive sin. This is a prevalent teaching in American Christianity from my experience. Hence, it is possible that these priests sexually abused children and then asked for Jesus' forgiveness later because they really believed that. In this regard, perhaps those Christians committed those crimes because they were Christians; being Christians gave them a sense of security of their afterlife as long as they mentioned Jesus' name.

In another aspect, those priests violated the commandment "love your neighbor as yourself", so they betrayed the teaching despite being Christians.

There is no unanimity among Christians as far as I know in terms of doctrines. Hence, I don't know which category they fit in. Based on the current situation in our country, I think Christians can do appalling things to other groups (either directly or through legislation) because their religion gives them a loophole for redemption, which creates excuses for their action.

I really don't have a good answer to your question. As an outsider of Christianity, I read a few religious texts and compare/contrast different religious groups, and that is how I have that view.

+ Add a Comment