Spiritual Competence, Religion and the Deep South

In the deep south, spirituality and religion are terms frequently used interchangeably. There are overlapping characteristics in both religion and spirituality, but they are defined differently. In order to provide spiritually competent care, it is important to understand your own views, as well as, the impact of community culture. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

I have worked all my 24-year nursing career in the state of Alabama. According to the Pew Research Center, Alabama is currently ranked as #1 (tied with Mississippi) as the most religious state in the U.S. Religion is a strong thread in the cultural fabric in this state and a key consideration in providing culturally competent nursing care. I considered religion and spirituality as interchangeable throughout many of my nursing years. In 2016, I found myself in spiritual distress eventually- leading to a deeper understanding of spiritually competent nursing care.

In May 2016, I checked into an inpatient facility for treatment of alcoholism. I don’t think anyone enters detox without having to experience a significant degree of negative life consequences- such as loss of job, relationships and sense of self. Through my drinking, I did a great job of isolating myself from all the people, places and things I held most dear. After 10 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, I realized I also lost my sense of spiritual connectedness. My treatment team would frequently to assess my spiritual condition by questions similar to these:

-Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?

-What is helping you through this experience?

-How do you express yourself spiritually?

-What personal spiritual goals do you hope to reach during treatment?

Important note: Our spiritual journey is unique to us- just as our patients’ spiritual journey is unique to them. The intent of this article is not to provide a “right or wrong” path to spirituality because it is different for every individual. To care for an individual in spiritual distress simply requires a nurse to support individuals in their own spiritual growth.

Prior to my spiritual crisis, I had inner laced religion and spirituality. I felt I was competent in supporting another’s spiritual needs but had little self-awareness of my own spirituality. I am certain living in a state where 53% of the population reports affiliation with a specific religion shaped my own perception of spirituality. In order to provide truly competent spiritual nursing care, I had to first understand the differences in religion and spirituality.

The Difference in Religion and Spirituality

Religion and spirituality are not the same, but the two often overlap. Spirituality reflects an interconnectedness with something bigger than ourselves and the search for life’s meaning. Christina Puchalski, MD, Director of the George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health defines spirituality as “the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature and to the significant or sacred”. Both religion and spirituality refer to the belief systems and philosophies of people and are often used in similar contexts. Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to an individual. However, an individual may be spiritual without affiliation to an organized religious system.

Characteristics of religion include:

A formal, organized system of beliefs with practices, activities and rituals to facilitate closeness to the sacred or transcendent.

  • Being a member of a group and following the teachings of others
  • Interconnectedness linked to church, temple, mosque, synagogue, etc.
  • Teaching and philosophies often based on the past
  • Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to a person

Characteristics of Spirituality:

  • A sense of relationship with believing in a power greater than ourselves
  • Subjective and individualistic
  • Spiritualism is a feature of the individual, not the group
  • About finding one’s own path
  • Inwardly directed
  • Less formal and emotionally oriented
  • Not authoritative
  • May be spiritual without affiliation with a religion

The Experience of Spiritual Distress

I experienced spiritual distress when I was unable to find sources of meaning, peace, strength and connectedness. I felt as if I was in a deep and dark hole and lost all hope I could get out.

I am now more aware when other individuals are having signs and symptoms of spiritual distress. A person may ask questions about the meaning of life, their belief system or pain and suffering. They may also suffer from feelings of sadness, depression, anxiety, anger and depression. A sense of isolation, emptiness and feeling alone is common with spiritual disconnect.

Meeting Spiritual Needs

It is important to be aware of your own spirituality to support another experiencing spiritual distress. As nurses, we must meet patients “where they are” and not where we think they should be. By projecting our own beliefs and ideas about where the patient should be spiritually, we could potentially inflict more suffering. This can be challenging for healthcare providers in a highly religious state or area. Here are a few guidelines when providing spiritual care:

Don’t assume you know what is best for the patient and do explore what or who can help in reconnecting (meditation, prayer, journaling, art, nature etc.)

  • Don’t give empty reassurances (“it will be alright”)
  • Don’t debate religion or impose your own views
  • Don’t try to “fix” your patient’s spiritual problems or answer “ unanswerable” questions
  • Actively listen to the patient
  • Ask “Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?
  • Ask “How do you express yourself spiritually and what is helping you through this experience”.

Do you think nurses fall short of addressing patients spiritual needs? Does the culture in your area impact the spiritual care you provide?

Additional Information:

Spiritual Distress Patient Education

Quote

For example, Numbers 15:32-36 undoubtedly called for stoning anyone who did not obey the Sabbath law.

Dude on that video clip is the reason why Jesus wanted a single church with a single system of administration. Humans fouled that up over the centuries as well, but the idea was that when someone like him just started making stuff up, an end would be put to it. That is not coherent Christianity.

As to the Numbers verse....the Hebrews are adrift in the Sinai desert at a time when brutality (by our standard) was the order of the day in that part of the world. Nothing unusual about cruel and unusual punishment. Discipline was critical to survival and if someone was unwilling to submit to the camp rules, lives could be endangered. 19th century naval forces acted the same way except they used ropes and not rocks. Distasteful to modern sensibilities, but absolutely accurate.

2 Votes
Quote

An institution that comprises flawed men claimed to have a divine authority to determine which book should be in the canon. How am I supposed to tell if those men in rope actually told the truth without an agenda to control the masses?

This has an interesting answer...There was a Greek translation (the Septuagint) of Hebrew texts that had been in use since before Jesus was born, so that group of texts was already set for Christians. But there were hundreds of different copies of texts in circulation by the 4th century. Most were what we have now in the New Testament. But there were many that were good, bad and just wrong. Christianity had spread throughout the entire Roman Empire, but there was great uniformity as to which texts were used for Christian worship. The decision was made to declare certain books as authoritative to avoid contrary doctrine and confusion. All of those books were well known before the canon of the bible was finally established. Even if a group in one part of the empire wanted to pull a fast one on the rest of the Christian world, they would have had a hard time getting away with it. We still have copies of some of the books that didn't make the 'cut'.

1 Votes
On 4/3/2019 at 9:42 AM, offlabel said:

This has an interesting answer...There was a Greek translation (the Septuagint) of Hebrew texts that had been in use since before Jesus was born, so that group of texts was already set for Christians. But there were hundreds of different copies of texts in circulation by the 4th century. Most were what we have now in the New Testament. But there were many that were good, bad and just wrong. Christianity had spread throughout the entire Roman Empire, but there was great uniformity as to which texts were used for Christian worship. The decision was made to declare certain books as authoritative to avoid contrary doctrine and confusion. All of those books were well known before the canon of the bible was finally established. Even if a group in one part of the empire wanted to pull a fast one on the rest of the Christian world, they would have had a hard time getting away with it. We still have copies of some of the books that didn't make the 'cut'.

Sure. I will take your words. Generally, this is simply an efforts among Christians to work it out for their religion. Great.

I am an outsider. Christians are free to battle with each other about their sets of doctrines. In the meantime, there is collateral damage that occurs to believers of other religions because of this internal conflict among Christians.

You can see how Catholics, Baptists, Mennonites, and Pentecostal fight each other over criteria of salvation. However, they are willing to unite to oppress non Christians, suppress gay rights, enforce 10 commandments as the law of the States, make excuses for Christian terrorists who bombed abortion clinics, justify slavery, etc.

You don't seem to support any of these. Since you are in one of these groups, it is similar to identity politics. Unless the individuals in such group say something to oppose barbaric acts done in the ideals of the group, I don't have a choice but see them the same as the evil ones in that group.

On 4/3/2019 at 9:12 AM, offlabel said:
Quote

Since we consider the 4 gospels historical, we infer what Jesus actually thought by the things first and second hand witnesses said that he said. If they wrote Jesus said 'Blessed are the merciful for they shall receive mercy', we believe that's what he really thought. Also, the belief and behavior of 1st and 2nd century Christians would suggest that they had a very specific belief about what Jesus thought about things.

I think Jesus seminar is the group of scholars who gathered votes to decide which sayings were actually Jesus'. If people from the Abrahamic faith with proper academic research cannot even reach the same conclusion about the cannons, Jesus' historical saying, the actual doctrine of the early Christians ("saved" by grace or deeds),..., asking people with non Christian background like myself to accept and worship this "deity in flesh" is too much expectation.

Quote

All faith traditions contain the truth. We Catholics believe, with regard to Jesus Christ and his church, that our faith contains the most Christian truth. That is an outrageous claim today, but there it is. The only way for you to decide, I think, is by looking at the historical record of both the New Testament, and the first 5 or so centuries of Christianity and compare that to what people believe today. You don't even have to be Christian. I think it's more of a question of history than anything else.

The claim is not any more outrageous than the Hare Krishna group who claims that Lord Krishna has the most universal truth. It only becomes a problem when this faith-based claim is used by Christians in the position of power to control people. The Catholic church is not the only institution doing this.

On 4/3/2019 at 9:29 AM, offlabel said:
Quote

Dude on that video clip is the reason why Jesus wanted a single church with a single system of administration. Humans fouled that up over the centuries as well, but the idea was that when someone like him just started making stuff up, an end would be put to it. That is not coherent Christianity.

Quote

As to the Numbers verse....the Hebrews are adrift in the Sinai desert at a time when brutality (by our standard) was the order of the day in that part of the world. Nothing unusual about cruel and unusual punishment. Discipline was critical to survival and if someone was unwilling to submit to the camp rules, lives could be endangered. 19th century naval forces acted the same way except they used ropes and not rocks. Distasteful to modern sensibilities, but absolutely accurate.

Sure. I don't believe in absolute morality like Christians. It's culturally relative. The issue here is that Christians ALWAYS speak on non Christians' behalf

Quote

Now while the sons of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering wood on the sabbath day. Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and to all the congregation; and they put him in custody because it had not been declared what should be done to him. Then the Lord said to Moses, “The man shall surely be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.” So all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him to death with stones, just as the Lord had commanded Moses.

If you happen to be my neighbour, I would have run away as quickly as I could. Do you know why?

It's not the reason you argue for stoning people to death for violating a tribal rule. According to this passage, your god, the beloved omni deity you worship and expect the rest of the world to comply to your church, is the one who ordered the stoning.

This is not simply some Native American tribe with arbitrary rule for survival of the group. This is the supreme being that your church claimed to have the most truth commanded the killing.

How do you think I am supposed to react? Just smile and accept it as a fact?

Your argument is the exact reason Christian politicians (including the Catholic senator Marco Rubio) use to justify their action against non Christians and gay people.

If you can justify the moral of these ancient Hebrews because of the god of the universe commanded as a nurse, how do you think people in power position including your pope are capable of doing when they believe that the supreme deity is on their side?

And then Christians complain about radical Muslims who slaughtered infidels when they simply exercise the same zeal of faith as you do.

This is what I call dishonesty.

1 Votes
Quote

If you happen to be my neighbor, I would have run away as quickly as I could. Do you know why?

It's not the reason you argue for stoning people to death for violating a tribal rule. According to this passage, your god, the beloved omni deity you worship and expect the rest of the world to comply to your church, is the one who ordered the stoning.

In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?

They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him. But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.
Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

"No one, sir," she said. "Then neither do I condemn you,"Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."

Same God, same Mosaic law, different time in history.

2 Votes
On 4/7/2019 at 12:04 AM, offlabel said:

In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women.Now what do you say?

They were using this question as a trap,in order to have a basis for accusing him. But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her."

At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.
Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

"No one, sir," she said. "Then neither do I condemn you,"Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."

Same God, same Mosaic law, different time in history.

Sure, once upon a time, your god ordered stoning adulterous women. Then Jesus came to abolish that law.

It's easy to realize that women had been stoned for cheating on their husbands until Jesus came.

The only conclusion I can draw is that these Mosaic laws were man made and attached with "god" to become authoritarian.

1 Votes
6 hours ago, vetpharmtech said:

Sure, once upon a time, your god ordered stoning adulterous women. Then Jesus came to abolish that law.

It's easy to realize that women had been stoned for cheating on their husbands until Jesus came.

The only conclusion I can draw is that these Mosaic laws were man made and attached with "god" to become authoritarian.

Quote

The only conclusion I can draw is that these Mosaic laws were man made and attached with "god" to become authoritarian.

Well, that isn't an unreasonable conclusion, considering that death for adultery wasn't unique to Hebrews 1500 years BCE. For a culture oriented to God, it would follow that all laws, not just the difficult ones, come from God. For pantheistc cultures, it would follow their law came from some god or gods as well. But for a culture to be slowly warming to the idea of a single, omniscient beneficent (toward them, anyways) deity was unique.

1 Votes
On 4/7/2019 at 9:31 AM, offlabel said:

Well, that isn't an unreasonable conclusion, considering that death for adultery wasn't unique to Hebrews 1500 years BCE. For a culture oriented to God, it would follow that all laws, not just the difficult ones, come from God. For pantheistc cultures, it would follow their law came from some god or gods as well. But for a culture to be slowly warming to the idea of a single, omniscient beneficent (toward them, anyways) deity was unique.

This is the first post from you that I consider humble. Most Christians (apologists anyway) never admit that what they consider the words of god is under the influence of their environment and their experience. In their mind, "because I have this experience that I believe to be correct, you have to be wrong."

When I read Leo Tolstoy's The Kingdom of God is within you, I began to understand why Christians in our country are extremely hostile to people like him. They cannot accept the fact that they are just as fallible as others.

The authors of the Bible wrote down what they considered inspiration from god. I guess when a Christian sees this view, he feels his infallible view is threatened and that he will have to accept the fact that people from other religions feel the same about their scriptures.

Islam is even more extreme that each verse in the Koran is the exact word from god.

I am relieved that you don't run to that position with the Bible.

1 Votes
On 4/7/2019 at 4:58 PM, vetpharmtech said:

This is the first post from you that I consider humble. Most Christians (apologists anyway) never admit that what they consider the words of god is under the influence of their environment and their experience. In their mind, "because I have this experience that I believe to be correct, you have to be wrong."

When I read Leo Tolstoy's The Kingdom of God is within you, I began to understand why Christians in our country are extremely hostile to people like him. They cannot accept the fact that they are just as fallible as others.

The authors of the Bible wrote down what they considered inspiration from god. I guess when a Christian sees this view, he feels his infallible view is threatened and that he will have to accept the fact that people from other religions feel the same about their scriptures.

Islam is even more extreme that each verse in the Koran is the exact word from god.

I am relieved that you don't run to that position with the Bible.

Quote

When I read Leo Tolstoy's The Kingdom of God is within you, I began to understand why Christians in our country are extremely hostile to people like him. They cannot accept the fact that they are just as fallible as others.

Tolstoy as a writer and philosopher is studied extensively by Christians that are not hostile to him at all. Explain?

Here is a pretty short example of a positive Catholic critique of 'The Death of Ivan Llych'. It's basically an endorsement of Tolstoy's philosophy in that story.

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2013/the-death-of-ivan-ilych-by-leo-tolstoy-a-story-for-all-souls

1 Votes
2 hours ago, offlabel said:

Tolstoy as a writer and philosopher is studied extensively by Christians that are not hostile to him at all. Explain?

Here is a pretty short example of a positive Catholic critique of 'The Death of Ivan Llych'. It's basically an endorsement of Tolstoy's philosophy in that story.

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2013/the-death-of-ivan-ilych-by-leo-tolstoy-a-story-for-all-souls

Keep in mind that when I say Christians, I am talking about believers who have at least one of these words attached to their Christian belief:

fundamentalist, theocratic, charismatic, evangelical, bible-thumping, independent baptist, Southern baptist, faith healing, non denominational, creationist,...

The doctrines among these Christians may be slightly different. Their view about humanity is the same.

Tolstoy's non violent principle does not at all chime with these Christians. Even Russian orthodox church was at war with his idea. He is a Christian anarchist after all. In contrast, the Catholic church loves to meddle political affair. As much as your church views Tolstoy in positive light, it is in charge of a theocratic state called the Vatican.

This is not at all what Tolstoy endorsed.

1 Votes
On 3/31/2019 at 11:51 PM, vetpharmtech said:

I would rather live next door to an orthodox Jew than a Christian.

I admit that I don't understand Jews' justification for atrocities in the Torah. However, I don't want to challenge them on those because Jews don't care about other religions. More importantly, at most orthodox Jews only require non Jews to practice Noahide laws, which are codes for ethical behavior, not "correct" belief.

With Christians, they always say that the Bible is the world of god for EVERY nation on this planet.

The moment I challenge them with the Upanishads, which predate the Bible and have much better wisdom, I am practicing the devil's religion.

I don't become a Christian because I "misunderstand" the Bible

People like offlabel don't become Hindus because they don't understand the Brahman in the Upanishads. Oh, wait. Hinduism is a false religion. Christianity is the only true religion. Hence, the Vedas, the Baghavad Gita, the Upanishads are books passed on by Lucifer. The bible is the only correct book. Why care about other books? They are not holy, right?

As you can see, excuses, excuses, and more excuses these people spit out so that they can justify their religion and invalidate others. When I point out the unsavory aspect of their holy book, I am the one who doesn't understand their god.

These people are nurses who have patients from "pagan" religions. Imagine that. Had our country not had the ACLU to protect people like you, GrumpyRn, and I, we all know what these Christian nurses can do at our death bed.

If you have time, listen to this clip at 53:54

This is a Christian (John) who defended a god who would burn people for eternity for their disbelief.

The more I delve into a conversation with offlabel, the more I recognize this barbaric mindset from Christians. Justification for the crime done by the Catholic church doesn't seem to be enough.

I would die in panic attack if people like him are my nurses before my illness kills me.

I think religions other than Christianity believe theirs is the one true religion.

What atrocities did the Jews commit in Torah?

On 3/6/2019 at 10:19 AM, SafetyNurse1968 said:

In my first week of school for my doctoral program, we were talking about "other ways of knowing." I divulged that I am a confused agnostic...I truly have no idea what's going on, and mostly just spend my spiritual time fumbling around in the dark looking for the light switch. One of my fellow students asked, in a completely sincere voice, "If you don't believe in God, then how do you know right from wrong? How do you know if you are making good decisions?" I've never met someone so different from myself. She needed the Bible to guide her through her day. I tried to explain that I "just know" but it came out sounding lame. What's your response to that type of question? I'll save it for the next time someone is baffled by my lack of faith.

One need not believe in God to be a decent person. I think most people probably grow up being taught to be nice, be polite, follow the law, respect teachers, elders, and other people in general.

If your classmate grew up believing in God or discovered Him later in life, that is fine. If following God and/or following a certain religion helps her to be decent, well, I am glad.

And I am a protestant follower of Jesus, just so you know where I am coming from. I was an atheist for a while in my younger years.

I am not at all sure that I, as a nurse, need to address my patients' religious or spiritual views or needs. In fact, I was taught way back in the dark ages in Nursing school to not bring up this sensitive topic. Many times I have wanted to but have almost never laid aside my schooling to do so. That's why we have chaplains, that's why we offer to call the Rabbi, the Priest, the Pastor, the Imam, or whoever the patient wishes when they have spiritual or religious needs.

But I guess it's different these days.

1 Votes
On 4/7/2019 at 8:15 PM, vetpharmtech said:

Keep in mind that when I say Christians, I am talking about believers who have at least one of these words attached to their Christian belief:

fundamentalist, theocratic, charismatic, evangelical, bible-thumping, independent baptist, Southern baptist, faith healing, non denominational, creationist,...

The doctrines among these Christians may be slightly different. Their view about humanity is the same.

Tolstoy's non violent principle does not at all chime with these Christians. Even Russian orthodox church was at war with his idea. He is a Christian anarchist after all. In contrast, the Catholic church loves to meddle political affair. As much as your church views Tolstoy in positive light, it is in charge of a theocratic state called the Vatican.

This is not at all what Tolstoy endorsed.

Can't a Christian be just a follower of the Jesus portrayed in the Gospels? Just someone who believes Jesus paid for our sins and gives us the free-to-us-though-very-costly-to-Him right to go to Heaven when we die, and the responsibility to share this excellent news with anyone who will listen?

+ Add a Comment