Spiritual Competence, Religion and the Deep South

In the deep south, spirituality and religion are terms frequently used interchangeably. There are overlapping characteristics in both religion and spirituality, but they are defined differently. In order to provide spiritually competent care, it is important to understand your own views, as well as, the impact of community culture. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

I have worked all my 24-year nursing career in the state of Alabama. According to the Pew Research Center, Alabama is currently ranked as #1 (tied with Mississippi) as the most religious state in the U.S. Religion is a strong thread in the cultural fabric in this state and a key consideration in providing culturally competent nursing care. I considered religion and spirituality as interchangeable throughout many of my nursing years. In 2016, I found myself in spiritual distress eventually- leading to a deeper understanding of spiritually competent nursing care.

In May 2016, I checked into an inpatient facility for treatment of alcoholism. I don’t think anyone enters detox without having to experience a significant degree of negative life consequences- such as loss of job, relationships and sense of self. Through my drinking, I did a great job of isolating myself from all the people, places and things I held most dear. After 10 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, I realized I also lost my sense of spiritual connectedness. My treatment team would frequently to assess my spiritual condition by questions similar to these:

-Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?

-What is helping you through this experience?

-How do you express yourself spiritually?

-What personal spiritual goals do you hope to reach during treatment?

Important note: Our spiritual journey is unique to us- just as our patients’ spiritual journey is unique to them. The intent of this article is not to provide a “right or wrong” path to spirituality because it is different for every individual. To care for an individual in spiritual distress simply requires a nurse to support individuals in their own spiritual growth.

Prior to my spiritual crisis, I had inner laced religion and spirituality. I felt I was competent in supporting another’s spiritual needs but had little self-awareness of my own spirituality. I am certain living in a state where 53% of the population reports affiliation with a specific religion shaped my own perception of spirituality. In order to provide truly competent spiritual nursing care, I had to first understand the differences in religion and spirituality.

The Difference in Religion and Spirituality

Religion and spirituality are not the same, but the two often overlap. Spirituality reflects an interconnectedness with something bigger than ourselves and the search for life’s meaning. Christina Puchalski, MD, Director of the George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health defines spirituality as “the aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience connectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature and to the significant or sacred”. Both religion and spirituality refer to the belief systems and philosophies of people and are often used in similar contexts. Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to an individual. However, an individual may be spiritual without affiliation to an organized religious system.

Characteristics of religion include:

A formal, organized system of beliefs with practices, activities and rituals to facilitate closeness to the sacred or transcendent.

  • Being a member of a group and following the teachings of others
  • Interconnectedness linked to church, temple, mosque, synagogue, etc.
  • Teaching and philosophies often based on the past
  • Belief in a religion may be very spiritual to a person

Characteristics of Spirituality:

  • A sense of relationship with believing in a power greater than ourselves
  • Subjective and individualistic
  • Spiritualism is a feature of the individual, not the group
  • About finding one’s own path
  • Inwardly directed
  • Less formal and emotionally oriented
  • Not authoritative
  • May be spiritual without affiliation with a religion

The Experience of Spiritual Distress

I experienced spiritual distress when I was unable to find sources of meaning, peace, strength and connectedness. I felt as if I was in a deep and dark hole and lost all hope I could get out.

I am now more aware when other individuals are having signs and symptoms of spiritual distress. A person may ask questions about the meaning of life, their belief system or pain and suffering. They may also suffer from feelings of sadness, depression, anxiety, anger and depression. A sense of isolation, emptiness and feeling alone is common with spiritual disconnect.

Meeting Spiritual Needs

It is important to be aware of your own spirituality to support another experiencing spiritual distress. As nurses, we must meet patients “where they are” and not where we think they should be. By projecting our own beliefs and ideas about where the patient should be spiritually, we could potentially inflict more suffering. This can be challenging for healthcare providers in a highly religious state or area. Here are a few guidelines when providing spiritual care:

Don’t assume you know what is best for the patient and do explore what or who can help in reconnecting (meditation, prayer, journaling, art, nature etc.)

  • Don’t give empty reassurances (“it will be alright”)
  • Don’t debate religion or impose your own views
  • Don’t try to “fix” your patient’s spiritual problems or answer “ unanswerable” questions
  • Actively listen to the patient
  • Ask “Who or what provides you with strength, hope and peace on a daily basis?
  • Ask “How do you express yourself spiritually and what is helping you through this experience”.

Do you think nurses fall short of addressing patients spiritual needs? Does the culture in your area impact the spiritual care you provide?

Additional Information:

Spiritual Distress Patient Education

On 3/29/2019 at 6:07 AM, GrumpyRN said:

While I don't agree with everything Vetpharmtech writes, did you not see the part where they stated they spent a year reading the bible to see exactly what was in it?

That he/she spent a year reading anything is no indicator at all of understanding. Someone could spend a year reading a chemistry textbook and still be as confused as when they started but consider themselves an expert, I guess. If you consider VPT any kind of authority on Christianity as a result of reading the bible, I'd say you were misled by those trying to form you as a Christian.

On 3/31/2019 at 5:54 PM, subee said:

And Judiasm does not prosletyze. IMHO, it's demeaning to people of an "other" religion that their religion is not good enough and they need to be changed before they are good enough for the people doing the prosletyzing.

Yes, Judiasm has a fundamentalist, insular population but they have no history of violence.

I would rather live next door to an orthodox Jew than a Christian.

I admit that I don't understand Jews' justification for atrocities in the Torah. However, I don't want to challenge them on those because Jews don't care about other religions. More importantly, at most orthodox Jews only require non Jews to practice Noahide laws, which are codes for ethical behavior, not "correct" belief.

With Christians, they always say that the Bible is the world of god for EVERY nation on this planet.

The moment I challenge them with the Upanishads, which predate the Bible and have much better wisdom, I am practicing the devil's religion.

I don't become a Christian because I "misunderstand" the Bible

People like offlabel don't become Hindus because they don't understand the Brahman in the Upanishads. Oh, wait. Hinduism is a false religion. Christianity is the only true religion. Hence, the Vedas, the Baghavad Gita, the Upanishads are books passed on by Lucifer. The bible is the only correct book. Why care about other books? They are not holy, right?

As you can see, excuses, excuses, and more excuses these people spit out so that they can justify their religion and invalidate others. When I point out the unsavory aspect of their holy book, I am the one who doesn't understand their god.

These people are nurses who have patients from "pagan" religions. Imagine that. Had our country not had the ACLU to protect people like you, GrumpyRn, and I, we all know what these Christian nurses can do at our death bed.

If you have time, listen to this clip at 53:54

This is a Christian (John) who defended a god who would burn people for eternity for their disbelief.

The more I delve into a conversation with offlabel, the more I recognize this barbaric mindset from Christians. Justification for the crime done by the Catholic church doesn't seem to be enough.

I would die in panic attack if people like him are my nurses before my illness kills me.

Specializes in Emergency Department.
11 hours ago, vetpharmtech said:

I checked Hasidic and Haredi Judaism. They look benign to me.

I'm not too sure about the strict adherence to orthodox law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodox_Judaism

Specializes in Emergency Department.
8 hours ago, offlabel said:

That he/she spent a year reading anything is no indicator at all of understanding. Someone could spend a year reading a chemistry textbook and still be as confused as when they started but consider themselves an expert, I guess. If you consider VPT any kind of authority on Christianity as a result of reading the bible, I'd say you were misled by those trying to form you as a Christian.

Are you STILL disputing MY understanding. Have you not perhaps realised that I know more than you think I know or even (whisper it) I know more than you?

On 4/1/2019 at 4:40 AM, GrumpyRN said:

Are you STILL disputing MY understanding. Have you not perhaps realised that I know more than you think I know or even (whisper it) I know more than you?

Well, since you (an atheist) and I (a buddhist) don't have the holy spirits in us, we cannot understand "God's words". We are immersed in sin and we need offlabel's God to rescue us through the blood of Jesus.

Interestingly, when I tell Christians that I find wisdom in sermon on the mount, no body tells me about how these teachings should be understood. The moment I show them the unsavory aspects of their bible, they say that misunderstand what those passages mean.

How convenient is that?

Christians simply don't want responsibility. They pick and choose and get triggered when they are pointed out.

Quote

We are immersed in sin and we need offlabel's God to rescue us through the blood of Jesus.

You're not going to like this, but Catholics believe it's possible for Atheists like you to go to Heaven as Atheists. It's just that you'd be really surprised when you get there and, yes, it would be through Jesus' sacrifice on the cross on your behalf.

Quote

Interestingly, when I tell Christians that I find wisdom in sermon on the mount, no body tells me about how these teachings should be understood.

Oh...cool. What do you want to know?

Quote

The moment I show them the unsavory aspects of their bible, they say that misunderstand what those passages mean.

You never asked me. If you try to be brief, I will too...shoot.

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.
On 4/1/2019 at 10:43 AM, vetpharmtech said:

Well, since you (an atheist) and I (a buddhist) don't have the holy spirits in us, we cannot understand "God's words". We are immersed in sin and we need offlabel's God to rescue us through the blood of Jesus.

Interestingly, when I tell Christians that I find wisdom in sermon on the mount, no body tells me about how these teachings should be understood. The moment I show them the unsavory aspects of their bible, they say that misunderstand what those passages mean.

How convenient is that?

Christians simply don't want responsibility. They pick and choose and get triggered when they are pointed out.

You continue to show your ignorance about Christianity. True Christians do not pick and choose but accept every aspect of the Bible as God's word to us. Those "unsavory aspects" are for learning (sometimes what not to do!), old testatment pictures of new testament truths. Christians do accept responsibility for their actions while at the same time realize that because of what Jesus did for us we will be forgiven and saved. Just because you don't accept this as truth does not give you the right to keep bashing Christians, and I am not sure why you have the incessant need to keep being disrespectful and doing that! Yea, you have met a few you don't like, get over it, no need to stereotype all!! It seems that you are the only one who is triggered.

Quote

You continue to show your ignorance about Christianity. True Christians do not pick and choose but accept every aspect of the Bible as God's word to us.

I guess you would follow this passage too, wouldn't you?

Quote

Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age. (Matthew 28:19-20)

Because some man who claimed to be the son of god told you to go around the world and convert others, people like myself are supposed to respect that, put up with your priviledge to preach, smile and walk away? I understand. I shall bow to your Lord when he told me himself. Can you pass my message to him please?

Can you also ask your Jesus why Jews like subee are so intolerant of other religious groups that they refuse to proselytize?

Thank you

Quote

And Judiasm does not prosletyze. IMHO, it's demeaning to people of an "other" religion that their religion is not good enough and they need to be changed before they are good enough for the people doing the prosletyzing.

Quote

True Christians do not pick and choose but accept every aspect of the Bible as God's word to us

I see. You are a true Christian. The rest who takes the Bible as it is are not.

If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them. (Leviticus 20:13)

Do you mind educating this pastor so that I can see him as a "true" Christian as I see you?

Quote

Those "unsavory aspects" are for learning (sometimes what not to do!), old testatment pictures of new testament truths.

I got you. All of us should love your god regardless of what he said

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Take full vengeance for the sons of Israel on the Midianites; afterward you will be gathered to your people.” Moses spoke to the people, saying, “Arm men from among you for the war, that they may go against Midian to execute the Lord’s vengeance on Midian. A thousand from each tribe of all the tribes of Israel you shall send to the war.” So there were furnished from the thousands of Israel, a thousand from each tribe, twelve thousand armed for war. Moses sent them, a thousand from each tribe, to the war, and Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, to the war with them, and the holy vessels and the trumpets for the alarm in his hand. So they made war against Midian, just as the Lord had commanded Moses, and they killed every male. They killed the kings of Midian along with the rest of their slain: Evi and Rekem and Zur and Hur and Reba, the five kings of Midian; they also killed Balaam the son of Beor with the sword. The sons of Israel captured the women of Midian and their little ones; and all their cattle and all their flocks and all their goods they plundered. Then they burned all their cities where they lived and all their camps with fire. They took all the spoil and all the prey, both of man and of beast. They brought the captives and the prey and the spoil to Moses, and to Eleazar the priest and to the congregation of the sons of Israel, to the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by the Jordan opposite Jericho.

Moses and Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the congregation went out to meet them outside the camp. Moses was angry with the officers of the army, the captains of thousands and the captains of hundreds, who had come from service in the war. And Moses said to them, “Have you spared all the women? Behold, these caused the sons of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, so the plague was among the congregation of the Lord. Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.

(Numbers 31)

Next time when you pray to your god, please tell him I appreciate the fact that he allowed Moses to kill every Midianites and keep the virgins so that you will not kill me in modern time.? Tell him that I want to thank him for sparing my life in 21st century.

Quote

Christians do accept responsibility for their actions while at the same time realize that because of what Jesus did for us we will be forgiven and saved

Congratulations! I am happy for you and your ancestors. I wish my ancestors owned a few slaves and then accepted Jesus so that they could keep the slaves and be forgiven. This is an excellent advice. Thank you.

Quote

Just because you don't accept this as truth does not give you the right to keep bashing Christians, and I am not sure why you have the incessant need to keep being disrespectful and doing that!

I am so sorry for hurting your godly feelings. I did not know that posting about Christian privilege per your request could hurt you that much.

I don't know that exercising the first amendment right can be that offensive to you.

I will do my best not to be offended when a Christian exercises his first amendment right to call me a wretched, sinful, abominable, evil being who deserves to be tortured for eternity unless I cleanse myself with Jesus' dripping blood on the cross.

Quote

Yea, you have met a few you don't like, get over it, no need to stereotype all!!

You are absolutely right. Those bad people are not Christians, are they? Those bad people are so twisted that they had to read the Bible as it said without dancing around the words. Next time, if I encounter such people, I would advise them to take your advice. I hope that they would not take apostle Paul's words seriously for your sake.

The women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says. If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is improper for a woman to speak in church. (1 Corinthians 14:34-35)

Be careful. If we happen to meet in real life, I cannot protect you from your fellow Christians since I am a Buddhist, I don't go to church, and I am gay. If they want to silence you in church, there is nothing I can do to safeguard you or your female relatives.

Quote

It seems that you are the only one who is triggered.

I am terribly sorry for being triggered. I totally forgot that I specifically said to you in another topic that I would not respond to you argument since you argue as a Christian and I argue as a humanist.

Maybe my memory begins to disfunction. I am not sure if you said this

Quote

What type of privileges do you think that Christians have that you don't that you feel the need to push back at.

You are not the one who asked me this question, correct?

Some Christian in this thread asked me this question and I gave her an answer.

I mistook you with that Christian, who advocated enforcing the 10 commandments in the public place. Do you know what the first commandment said?

I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. You shall have no other gods before Me (Exodus 20:2-3)

I remember the first amendment said...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Please help me. I don't know what to do. That Christian wants to enforce Christian rule on the same land that gave me the gift of freedom to worship.

Since you are a "nice" Christian, do you mind telling her on my behalf?

Thank you.

Quote

You're not going to like this, but Catholics believe it's possible for Atheists like you to go to Heaven as Atheists. It's just that you'd be really surprised when you get there and, yes, it would be through Jesus' sacrifice on the cross on your behalf.

If this is a Catholic doctrine, why do you defend the Bible when you don't consider the Bible as the sole authority?

Quote

Oh...cool. What do you want to know?

I know enough. You don't understand what I said. Is my English that bad?

Quote

You never asked me. If you try to be brief, I will too...shoot.

I don't like to argue with apologists. If you don't look at the atrocities in the bible through the lenses of a human being with a heart but as a child of god instead, you would not understand.

I did encounter Christians who were horrified with the atrocities done in god's name in the old testament. They believed in god, but they did not make excuses for divine violence.

Our conversations continue to descend, and you already see me as intellectual deficient to "understand" your book. What's the point?

If you treat the Baghavad Gita with the same rigor, I will be more comfortable to discuss those unsavory parts of the Bible with you. Otherwise, I don't want to become your echo chamber.

Quote

If this is a Catholic doctrine, why do you defend the Bible when you don't consider the Bible as the sole authority?

The Bible is authoritative, but it isn't our sole authority. Christ never said to write anything down. But he knew that we would. There was a Christian Church long before there was that book you read. Those writings existed along with reams of others that were not put in the bible. The Christian Church decided which were authoritative, not the Bible itself.

Quote

If you treat the Baghavad Gita with the same rigor, I will be more comfortable to discuss those unsavory parts of the Bible with you.

The Bagavad Gita is beautiful ancient literature. But it is one book and the Bible is 73 books. In the bible there are genres of law, history, wisdom, poetry, narrative, epistles, prophecy and apocalyptic literature. We don't look at one the same way we look at another anymore than we'd look at Harry Potter the same way we'd critique the Bagavad Gita.

Quote

Our conversations continue to descend, and you already see me as intellectual deficient to "understand" your book. What's the point?

Then let's level off and have a conversation.

On 4/2/2019 at 9:22 AM, offlabel said:
Quote

The Bible is authoritative, but it isn't our sole authority. Christ never said to write anything down. But he knew that we would.

How do you know what Jesus actually thought? How do I, an outsider, know between you and a southern baptist who is the correct one?

Quote
Quote

There was a Christian Church long before there was that book you read. Those writings existed along with reams of others that were not put in the bible. The Christian Church decided which were authoritative, not the Bible itself.

An institution that comprises flawed men claimed to have a divine authority to determine which book should be in the canon. How am I supposed to tell if those men in rope actually told the truth without an agenda to control the mass?

Quote
Quote

The Bagavad Gita is beautiful ancient literature. But it is one book and the Bible is 73 books. In the bible there are genres of law, history, wisdom, poetry, narrative, epistles, prophecy and apocalyptic literature.

I brought up the Baghavad Gita to make a point. The Vedic system has many books. Besides the Baghavad Gita, there are the Vedas, Upanishads, the epics Mahabharata and Ramayana, and maybe more. Not mentioning the non-religious collection of wisdom Panchatantra and Hitopadesha.

The Vedic traditions have no less religious nuances than your Abrahamic faith.

Quote
Quote

We don't look at one the same way we look at another anymore than we'd look at Harry Potter the same way we'd critique the Bagavad Gita.

Now I see why this happens

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47771706

In the meantime, there are people who revere Harry Potter as sacred texts

Once again, you and I don't stand on a common ground. You already consider a Hindu sacred text the same as a book for entertainment.

And yet you are indignant when I treat your Bible as a collection of interesting stories whose authors claimed to receive message from a supreme being.

Quote

How do you know what Jesus actually thought? How do I, an outsider, know between you and a southern baptist who is the correct one?

Since we consider the 4 gospels historical, we infer what Jesus actually thought by the things first and second hand witnesses said that he said. If they wrote Jesus said 'Blessed are the merciful for they shall receive mercy', we believe that's what he really thought. Also, the belief and behavior of 1st and 2nd century Christians would suggest that they had a very specific belief about what Jesus thought about things.

All faith traditions contain the truth. We Catholics believe, with regard to Jesus Christ and his church, that our faith contains the most Christian truth. That is an outrageous claim today, but there it is. The only way for you to decide, I think, is by looking at the historical record of both the New Testament, and the first 5 or so centuries of Christianity and compare that to what people believe today. You don't even have to be Christian. I think it's more of a question of history than anything else.

+ Add a Comment