South Carolina LPNs Arrested For Not Changing Wound Dressings

Two LPNs in a skilled nursing facility were arrested and charged with a felony for not changing the dressings on two patients. The charges raise more questions than they answer. Nurses General Nursing News

Updated:   Published

According to South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson's office, two LPNs at Magnolia Manor in South Carolina were accused of failing to tend to the injuries of two residents. They were arrested and charged with Neglect of a Vulnerable Adult on December 8, 2022. 

"A joint investigation between the Spartanburg Police Department and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (SCMFCU) found that between September 9th and September 11th, 2022, the two nurses allegedly failed to provide appropriate care as per the medical orders.”

Five months later, still not much is known. Here's what we do know:

  • Both are from South Carolina-the two LPNs are Alyssa Morris, 22, of Cowpens, South Carolina, and Heather Gowan, 44, of Gaffney, in South Carolina
  • Heather Gowan has been licensed as an LPN since 2007, while Alyssa Morris has only been an LPN since February 2022. 
  • The charges claim the nurses both intentionally failed to change wound dressings at the skilled nursing facility, which caused the wounds to "increase in size." This incident was reported to law enforcement by Magnolia Manor, who cooperated fully with investigators.
  • The Attorney General's Office plans to prosecute Morris and Gowan.

Neglect of a Vulnerable Adult in South Carolina

According to South Carolina law,  a vulnerable adult is a person "eighteen years of age or older who has a physical or mental condition which substantially impairs the person from adequately providing for their care or protection. A resident of a facility is a vulnerable adult." 

Consequences

Neglect of a Vulnerable Adult is a felony in South Carolina and, upon conviction, carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.

Who Turned Them In?

According to the news, the facility, Magnolia Manor, reported itself to law enforcement. It's fair to say that healthcare facilities do not turn themselves in; instead, someone files a complaint. So it's conceivable a complaint triggered the investigation.

It also seems that Magnolia did not turn themselves in so much as they turned in the two nurses. Interesting that Magnolia chose to involve law enforcement rather than the BON.

Who notified the authorities?

It could have been a:

  • Disgruntled or concerned coworker
  • Family members (of both families?)
  • Provider

It's doubtful that a provider would have filed a complaint to law enforcement as they would have instead complained to the administration. It's also likely the provider would not have been aware because they do not round frequently in skilled nursing facilities.

A family member may have noticed that the dressing on their loved one was not changed as ordered, but there were two patients. Maybe the families talked amongst themselves and reported.

Perhaps a coworker was concerned for the two patients.

Collecting Evidence

The dates are precise, September 9 and September 11. These are the dates the ordered care was not given. A significantly larger wound would not have been realized in 1-2 days, so were progressive photographs of the wounds taken as evidence? 

What evidence shows that the dressings were not changed during that time? Photographs of an unchanged dressing? Taken by whom?

How does the state prove intention, as in "intentionally failed to change... wound dressings"?

Medicaid Fraud Control

Medicare or Medicaid fraud can take many forms, such as billing for services that were never actually provided, performing tests that are not necessary, and obtaining benefits without being eligible. 

Other types of fraud include:

  • Billing for phantom patients
  • Double billing
  • Billing for non-covered goods or services
  • Billing for more expensive services than were performed
  • Kickbacks

The fact that it's a fraud investigation means it was probably documented but not done. It's possible that multiple wound dressings were billed for but never done. In that case, the facility would be cited. 

Unanswered questions

Anyone who has worked in a hospital or licensed subacute knows the process. A complaint is filed, and there is an investigation. If deficiencies are found, the facility is cited and must then come up with a corrective plan of action. Why was the facility not cited, as is typical in such cases? 

Possible scenario

There's a scenario where the nurses followed the existing culture at the skilled nursing facility and wrongly chose to document tasks not done.

Was documenting care not given common practice at this facility, or were these two LPNs outliers in terms of skipping care? If other nurses could do the ordered dressing changes, then why couldn't they?

Or conversely, if no one could routinely complete their work, why were these two targeted?

Assuming nurses Morris and Gowan documented fraudulently, were they dishonest and intentionally slacking or dishonest and overwhelmed? Did they document the dressings as done, intending to do them later? 

Were nurses provided enough time and supplies to complete their assignments? 

As of today, they both have active compact state licenses. They both face criminal charges, and they'll likely face BON sanctions. 

This writer is looking forward to hearing and sharing more facts about the case. 

This is the reason why the number of people wanting to be nurses is dwindling. Hearing stories like this is enough to scare people from the profession. 

Specializes in kids.
hppygr8ful said:

No I don't. I was being facetious.?

I didn't think so, but one never knows...?

When more than one instance of identical nature is discovered, the investigator obtains a sample of patients and investigates. I hope they self-reported to the state first and the state surveyors conducted a survey within the same day.

Specializes in Vents, Telemetry, Home Care, Home infusion.

First time I can remember seeing this in PA BON disciplinary action list:

Quote

voluntarily surrendered her license, because she was convicted of Forgery, Tampering with Records or Identification and Unsworn Falsification to Authorities and poses a substantial risk to the public health and safety of her patients or clients or the public or a substantial risk of further criminal
convictions. (4/14/23)

 

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.
vintagegal said:

This is troublesome. Has it come to the point where you, as a healthcare worker, have to additionally prove you're completing tasks outside of the charting? Should we hire someone to follow us with video cameras ? 

At the risk of stating the obvious, if you are doing your job, and documenting you shouldnt need a camera team

These people didn't do their job, they lied about it and patients were harmed

Specializes in Nursing.
egg122 NP said:

This is the kind of stuff that is going to drive nurses out of the profession. Why aren't  administrators, managers and owners ever charged for intentional understaffing and poor conditions in their homes? 

No one is forced to work at these places if the conditions are so bad.  They documented it and didn't do it.  You also have to wonder what else they may have documented but didn't do.  I worked with a nurse one time that documented she changed the nitro paste on a patient.  The problem was that the nurse before her had done it and initialed it on the dressing, so I know this nurse did not change it.  It was her last shift she was a casual employee.  I'm not a write up type of person so I let it slide, but made sure I corrected her laziness.

Specializes in Nursing.
Nursingjourneyguide said:

This is the reason why the number of people wanting to be nurses is dwindling. Hearing stories like this is enough to scare people from the profession. 

If the number is actually dwindling I would suspect its because people don't want to work hard anymore.

Specializes in PICU, Pediatrics, Trauma.
egg122 NP said:

This is the kind of stuff that is going to drive nurses out of the profession. Why aren't  administrators, managers and owners ever charged for intentional understaffing and poor conditions in their homes? 

A bit off topic, but Yes, yes, yes, "intentional understaffing"  and "poor conditions" are chronically occurring these days especially since Covid struck.  I'm very grateful that I recently retired.  Poor conditions and staffing issues have been a problem for years now.  After 40 plus years of nursing it appears to me that these issues became more common since corporate organizations took over ownership of hospitals and have become progressively worse.

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Emergent said:

Demeaning to the ever more entitled, demanding, thin skinned patient population we encounter in our overfed, over pampered society, that is ready to call a lawyer at the drop of a hat?

That's why I hear medical Mission work is so rewarding to healthcare professionals from the first world. You get to help people who are grateful and thankful.

Our patient population who has been reassured that they live in a country with the best Healthcare in the world only to discover that their personal Healthcare is outrageously expensive and not terribly accessible or convenient and is often delivered in inpatient settings by dangerously overworked and under staffed workers who are often treated as "warm bodies" when safe staffing numbers are considered. 

Our current healthcare trajectory isn't going to make any aspect of this story better in the future. 

Should licensed healthcare workers who harm patients through intentional action or inaction be accountable for the harm? Should the facility ALSO be accountable or should they be accountable instead? 

I'm not an advocate of qualified immunity, especially when someone called a professional makes a choice that causes harm and especially when that happens more than once. We aren't unthinking task completers.

It's concerning to hear about the arrest of the two LPNs for neglecting wound dressings. The situation raises important questions about patient care, staffing levels, and facility management. We need to understand the full context before passing judgment, as there might be underlying factors contributing to this incident. Nevertheless, it highlights the need for proper training, supervision, and accountability in healthcare settings to ensure the well-being of patients.

Specializes in Mental Health, Gerontology, Palliative.
Peter Davids said:

 We need to understand the full context before passing judgment,

They didn't do their job and lied about it. Patients were harmed. 

full context for you

Specializes in Critical Care.
Tenebrae said:

They didn't do their job and lied about it. Patients were harmed. 

full context for you

Weellllll

The whole CMS report is catty he said she said BS with questionable patient compliance. 

I'm having trouble justifying this as a criminal offense. The LPNs were fired but for the number of residents and LPNs involved it sounds like there might be something deeper. There's nothing mentioned about staffing and ratios for starters. Plus even meticulous dressing changes won't do anything if the wounds aren't offloaded properly. Nutrition, comorbidities, overall health. Wounds (and therefore the blame assigned to them) are more than daily dressings.

For a criminal offense, I'd personally love to see something a little less childish than this report. The last few paragraphs are hilarious:

LPN4 was suspended because LPN3 presented "a glove with a crumpled up old wound dressing and reported the dressing had an old date as proof wound care was not provided."

LPN3 was suspended "for cussing out LPN4"

"LPN5 reported LPN3 and LPN4 had never gotten along and it was difficult working when they were both on duty"

?