Ritttenhouse Trial

Published

The Rittenhouse trial has begun in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The prosecution is presenting first, but apparently the defense argument will be self-defense. So a 17 year old travels out of state with his rifle to a demonstration because he fears for his life? 

 

1 hour ago, toomuchbaloney said:

I believe that the jury will be sympathetic and lenient.  

Did the judge rule on the mistrial motion yet? 

That was your prediction before, or at least early on in the trial.  After all the testimony, your opinion hasn't changed one way or another?  If he is acquitted, it's not because of what happened in the trial but it's because of a lenient jury? 

No, not ruling yet.  If there was, you would have heard of it.

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
5 minutes ago, Beerman said:

That was your prediction before, or at least early on in the trial.  After all the testimony, your opinion hasn't changed one way or another?  If he is acquitted, it's not because of what happened in the trial but it's because of a lenient jury? 

No, not ruling yet.  If there was, you would have heard of it.

I'm from the Great Lakes region of the country originally.  Yes, I felt early on that the jury would be lenient and nothing in the trial changed that opinion. I did think that the prosecution delivered a stronger closing argument than did the defense.  But, I think that the jury will measure the facts in the case against their feelings about open carry and self defense.  I imagine my family or long term friends or acquaintances on that jury and I imagine a sympathetic and lenient perspective when I do.  

4 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:

I'm from the Great Lakes region of the country originally.  Yes, I felt early on that the jury would be lenient and nothing in the trial changed that opinion. I did think that the prosecution delivered a stronger closing argument than did the defense.  But, I think that the jury will measure the facts in the case against their feelings about open carry and self defense.  I imagine my family or long term friends or acquaintances on that jury and I imagine a sympathetic and lenient perspective when I do.  

I can appreciate that perspective based on your experience.  However, I don't think he went there to start trouble.  And, I don't know what he should have been expected to do.  

Specializes in Critical Care.
5 minutes ago, Beerman said:

I can appreciate that perspective based on your experience.  However, I don't think he went there to start trouble.  And, I don't know what he should have been expected to do.  

Maybe not go to a clearly unstable situation and run around carrying a rifle?

1 minute ago, MunoRN said:

Maybe not go to a clearly unstable situation and run around carrying a rifle?

I agree.  But that doesn't give the others the right to chase you down to beat the crap out of you or kill you.

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
4 minutes ago, Beerman said:

I can appreciate that perspective based on your experience.  However, I don't think he went there to start trouble.  And, I don't know what he should have been expected to do.  

I don't recall saying that he went there to start trouble.  I doubt that the psychology behind Rittenhouse's decision making was that simple. He's young and he made some really bad choices for really bad reasons last August.  Clearly, Rittenhouse was confused as to why he was in Kenosha that evening and what he should or should not have done or expected others to do while he was openly carrying a dangerous weapon. Was he guarding a business? Was he guarding several buildings on different locations? Was he the medic for the armed group? Was he the medic for the larger community or neighborhood?

IMV the question isn't whether or not he was reckless and that recklessness resulted in death and harm. I see the question as whether or not he will be held accountable for that reckless behavior.  

Specializes in Critical Care.
9 minutes ago, Beerman said:

I agree.  But that doesn't give the others the right to chase you down to beat the crap out of you or kill you.

No, it doesn't, but the law doesn't give you a free pass to intentionally agitate people by a show of aggression so then you can shoot them and claim self-defense.  

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.

The jury submitted not guilty decisions for all charges.  Rittenhouse remains free.

Specializes in Med-Surg.

Not guilty of all charges.  I have to trust the process.   Hope there is no violence.   

Specializes in Public Health, TB.

Not surprised, but very disappointed. 

Specializes in Travel, Home Health, Med-Surg.

Justice was served today. If it wasn’t already apparent ( from the video footage) that this was self defense the prosecutor's own witness announced it was when he testified. 

“The only people who would be upset are those who have a hidden agenda outside the rule of law.” (Leo Terrell, civil rights attorney)

https://www.foxnews.com/media/leo-terrell-praises-rittenhouse-jury-after-not-guilty-verdict-im-proud-as-a-civil-rights-attorney

Specializes in LPN/Pallative Hospice.
On 11/11/2021 at 11:07 AM, toomuchbaloney said:
On 11/17/2021 at 10:15 PM, MunoRN said:

No, it doesn't, but the law doesn't give you a free pass to intentionally agitate people by a show of aggression so then you can shoot them and claim self-defense.  

Nor does getting prematurely upset about a police shooting give anyone the right to riot cause violence and destroy property of people not even involved with the police shooting. 

I was a little worried that the jury was going to be intimidated by the obvious intimidation of the people "protesting" outside of the jury room and despicable hags like Joyless Ried on MSMBC and all the other left wing garbage news. 

+ Join the Discussion