"gypsy" nurses

Nurses General Nursing

Published

http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82%257E1865%257E1497479,00.html

A Traveler's Tale: Nursing shortage boosts demand for "gypsy" nurses

By Rebecca Vesely - STAFF WRITER

Sunday, July 06, 2003 -

It seems like a dream job.

Free luxury housing. Guaranteed overtime. Car allowances. $2,500 bonuses. Six months in Hawaii.

Plus, they're saving lives.

A relatively new breed of nurse has emerged out of the sustained national nursing shortage: the ``traveler.'' Travelers jump from city to city, working in hospitals that don't have enough staff nurses to meet patient demand. They contract through national staffing agencies for one month to 13 weeks per job. Essentially, they're the temp workers of the medical profession.

The Bay Area is a popular destination for travelers for the same reasons tourists love coming here. Even better, traveler pay in the Bay Area is the highest in the country. Local hospitals spend as much as $80 an hour per nurse to staffing agencies specializing in traveling nurses. And the nurses get a cut of between $35 and $50 an hour, plus guaranteed time-and-a-half for a portion of each shift and completion bonuses in the thousands of dollars for just a few months of work.

On the surface, it's a win-win. Hospitals in California, which ranks 49 out of 50 states in its share of registered nurses, need qualified, experienced health care workers. But underneath there's a quiet debate going on in Bay Area hospitals over travelers.

Critics - ranging from local staff nurses to national experts on the subject - contend that travelers contribute to nurse burnout instead of alleviating it because of the constant turnover. They also say travelers compromise patient care.

The steep fees commanded by agencies that supply travelers can add up to millions each year for hospitals. This, in particular, is causing Kaiser Permanente to phase them out this summer. And Alameda County Medical Center, which includes Highland and Fairmont hospitals, hired a nurse recruiter this spring to lure more permanent nursing staff so it could ween itself off the high-priced travelers.

Demand for travelers remains steady at Bay Area hospitals, though, and could increase in January of next year - when California becomes the first state to mandate nurse-to-patient ratios. On Tuesday, the state released its revised list of the maximum number patients that can be assigned to each nurse on duty. In response, the California Healthcare Association, representing hospitals in the state, said that hospitals would be forced to hire more travelers to meet the ratios.

That's great news for nurses longing for the open road. The perks don't hurt, either. ``We call it the fishbowl,'' said Debbie Jacobs, a 29-year-old nurse from Denver who is on assignment at Children's Hospital in Oakland, describing her free accommodations - a two-bedroom apartment in San Francisco's South Park, near Pac Bell Park, she shares with another traveler.

``It has 360 degree views of the Bay.''

Another traveler at Children's Hospital, Marijane Holjes, 26, from Harrisburg, Pa., explains her digs on Post Street in San Francisco in two quick words, ``It's awesome.''

Kurt Smudzinski, 26, a traveling nurse from Long Island now at Alta Bates Summit, has spent the past four years on the road. When he wasn't caring for patients, he was snowboarding in Boulder, Colo., laying on the beach in San Diego, and surfing in Hawaii. He owns three surfboards, at about $600 a pop.

``First I wanted to live in the mountains, then near the ocean,'' he said with a grin. The cream, or the concern of nursing?

For these nurses, and about 25,000 others like them nationwide, traveling has staved off the pitfalls for their chosen profession - burnout, repetition and mounting paperwork.

Of the six travelers interviewed at various area hospitals, most said they would have left the nursing profession by now, but travel has given them freedom, money and the opportunity to care for people without getting caught up in the administrative hassles that are part and parcel of the modern health care system.

``They represent the cream of nursing,'' said Nancy Shibata, director of nursing at Children's Hospital in Oakland, which employed 30 travelers this winter to meet the seasonal spike in patients. ``They are like sponges. They soak up information and then take it onto the next job.''

There's the rub. Travelers take their experience with them when they leave - and staff nurses are left to train yet another nurse who's just landed on their doorstep, so the complaint goes.

``Travelers aren't oriented to the facility and so they are a lot slower and they don't have the focus to be part of the team,'' said Regina Harrison, a nurse at Kaiser Permanente's Oakland Medical Center, echoing a common sentiment. ``More nurses are injured because they are lifting patients and moving them by themselves because travelers won't help.''

National surveys support this notion that high numbers of travelers compromise nurses - and patients.

Nancy Aiken is a leading researcher in nurse safety and burnout who directs the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. In her research, she has found that needle stick injuries to staff and patients go up when permanent staff goes down, and the higher numbers of temporary staff affects patient outcome as well.

``Our primary concern about travelers is they don't know hospital staff and procedures,'' Aiken said. ``There's nothing wrong with the nurses themselves. Safety concerns have to do with nature of hospital care - it's so intensive and so fast-paced, that you need cohesion and a good relationship among the staff.''

Jan Rodolfo, an oncology nurse at Summit Hospital, said so many travelers are at Summit that working on a shift without them is ``a luxury,'' and high turnover is compromising patient safety. She said it is not unusual to go into a room where a traveler is on shift and find that basic things have not been taken care of, like changing IV sites to avoid infections and bathing patients.

``I have seen an increase in medical errors and medications missed - these errors are concentrated with the travelers,'' Rodolfo said. ``They are not being oriented properly. A number of them do an admirable job, but it is not an ideal situation.''

Nevertheless, the travelers interviewed for this article were trained at some of the leading hospitals in the country before they hit the road. Holjes, the one with the awesome apartment, spent several years as an ICU nurse at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, one of the leading pediatric centers in the country. Smudzinski, the surfer, was at New York University Hospital before he started traveling. And 45-year-old Leslie Huff, a nurse at Summit Hospital, spent 13 years learning her craft in Austin, Texas.

Nurse managers and experts on travelers agree that the problem doesn't lie with the individual nurses, but rather the system.

``When it's not your own staff, maybe they (travelers) aren't as interested in customer service,'' said Viki Ardito, director of nursing at Alta Bates Summit, which employs 160 travelers out of a nursing staff of about 1,000. ``And teamwork is affected when you have turnover. ''

Staff nurses interviewed for this article said that complaints have been filed at their respective hospitals about travelers. But managers at Alta Bates Summit, Children's and Kaiser Permanente all said they had not heard of any concerns. Nurses at Children's Hospital in Oakland had suggested the hospital create a permanent position whose main task would be to orient travelers, but the idea was rejected because of costs. ''Endless questions''

On a recent spring morning at the cardiac care unit at Summit Hospital in Oakland, no bed was empty.

Patients here are admitted in the morning, usually for non-invasive heart surgery, like clearing a blocked artery. They are monitored overnight and released the next day. This unit opened in January as part of Summit's highly regarded cardiac surgery department - among the top 50 in the nation - and serves patients from all over the Bay Area. Ten patients have surgery every day here, adding up to about 3,000 by year-end.

On this particular shift, 14 patients shared four nurses - all travelers.

Nancy Brosnan, the critical care nurse manager who has 26 years experience, said travelers help with hospital flexibility, and that she carefully screens all the nurses who do a tour through here.

``I spend a lot of time making sure the new people understand the unit,'' Brosnan said.

Some of the travelers on shift this morning have been here a while. Smudzinski is one of them, and he has been ``traveling'' here since last November, so is well oriented to the facility.

Travelers typically get one day of orientation. During that first shift, they do their paperwork, get their ID cards, and are teamed up with a staff nurse, who shows the traveler the ropes on the first day. The next time the new traveler comes on a shift, they are usually assigned their own patients. Nurse managers said that travelers are used to moving around so they adapt quickly. Staff nurses said one day of orientation is not enough. Martha Kuhl, 51, who has worked as a nurse at Children's Oakland for 21 years and is a specialist in pediatric oncology, said it is up to staff to constantly train the travelers in everything from where to find equipment to how much of an unfamiliar medication to give a child.

``It's endless questions,'' Kuhl said. ``It's `Where do I find this?' And `How do you do that?'''

Holjes, the ICU traveler at Children's Oakland, agrees that orientation is an issue. ``Half the problem with being a traveler is not knowing where things are, who you need to talk to and what the protocols are,'' she said. ``Every hospital has different ventilators and monitors.''

Kuhl said she would never assign a very sick patient to a traveler for this reason. ``So the outcome is that a nurse like me who is an expert on a unit gets all the tough assignments,'' she said.

But travelers said that once their colleagues know that they can handle the most difficult patients, they are willing to hand them off to them. It is a matter of building trust quickly.

Travelers - often from the Southern states where nurse salaries are particularly low - typically must be trained on how to interact with the diverse needs of Bay Area patients.

Two staff nurses at separate hospitals cited the example of immigrant patients from China. Most Bay Area nurses know never to offer a Chinese patient something cold to drink or eat after surgery. In Chinese culture, only warm food or drink is considered tolerable to the human bodyMDBO MDNMwhen sick. A nurse who doesn't know this will offer something cold to a Cantonese-speaking patient, for instance, and the patient will refuse.

The nurse will then write in the patient's chart that the patient is not eating, and the patient will go without a meal, compromising their recovery, staff nurses said.

Charity McGriff, a 29-year-old traveling nurse from Birmingham, Ala., said she enjoys the diversity, and wants to know more. ``I had never taken care of a Cantonese patient before,'' she said. ``Now I am learning some Cantonese words, like the word for pain.''

It's the not knowing, though, staff nurses said, that creates a difficult situation for everyone - especially patients.

``We discover that a nurse isn't up to the task only after a mistake has been made, instead of being able to gauge the experience level of each nurse before mistakes,'' Rodolfo of Summit Hospital said, adding, ``I don't like the conditions we encounter daily. You need travelers, but the high numbers of them contribute to chaos on the floor.''

Another familiar complaint among staff is the amount of hours travelers work. To sweeten the deal, travelers are guaranteed 12-hour shifts every time they work, while staff nurses work eight-hour shifts. Travelers like the longer shifts because they get guaranteed overtime and can typically work three days in a row and then get four days off to sightsee around the Bay Area.

Staff nurses complain that the discrepencies between staff and traveler work schedules leave too many travelers and not enough staff on the floor during those four hours that travelers stay on and staff go home. So, for instance, staff nurses will work an eight-hour shift of 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., while travelers will work a longer shift of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

``You have a nightmare between three and seven,'' said Ardito, the nursing director at Alta Bates Summit. ``We try to get staff to match up as much as possible. Every day is a juggling act.''

Harrison of Kaiser Oakland said the 12-hour shifts can be tough on any nurse, but especially those who are learning a new facility. ``At the end of their shifts, they are wiped out.'' The hidden costs of travelers

Can consistent quality patient care be assured with temporary nurses?

Kaiser Permanente doesn't seem to think so. Kaiser employs about 500 travelers in its California hospitals - including Oakland, Walnut Creek and Vallejo - but management plans to phase out all of them by summer's end.

Despite state mandated nurse-to-patient ratios scheduled to go into effect in January, based on legislation passed in 1999, Kaiser said the high costs of travelers, combined with concerns about patient care, are putting an end to the practice.

``When you have travelers there is a lack of continuity of care,'' said Marylin Chow, vice president of patient care services at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California.

Hard numbers on how much travelers cost hospitals are hard to pin down. Hospitals nationwide spent an estimated $71 million on travelers in 2001, according to a study by First Consulting Group, a research firm. Of those hospitals that employ travelers, about 76 percent pay travelers more than 20 percent over what they pay regular staff, according to the study. Local nurse directors said travelers cost the same as staff because they don't pay their health benefits, vacation time and worker's compensation costs - the staffing agencies cover these expenses.

Alta Bates Summit and Children's Oakland would not release figures on how much they spend on travelers. Kaiser Permanente spent at least several million last year on travelers, Chow said - a major reason why they are phasing them out. The Alameda County Medical Center spent $1.3 million last fiscal year on non-permanent staff, including about 40 travelers, a spokeswoman said.

Full-time staffers at Highland Hospital are critical of the use of high-priced travelers - especially at a time when it is closing outpatient clinics and considering slashing more services to meet a $45.7 million budget deficit.

``I don't understand why you would provide double the wage for someone who doesn't have double the experience,'' Dolores Flanagan, a nurse at Highland, told Medical Center CEO Kenneth Cohen at a budget hearing in late June, to thunderous applause from her collegues. Nursing expert Aiken said that hospitals fail to account for costs to replace staff nurses because of burnout created, in part, by the traveler system. For every staff nurse who quits, hospitals must pay about $45,000 to recruit a replacement, and up to $65,000 to replace a specialty nurse.

Some travelers renew their contracts for a year or more - reaping the benefits of free housing and automatic overtime. Indeed, several staffing agencies said opportunities are fewer at Bay Area hospitals this year in part because travelers keep renewing their contracts, or they decide to stay on as permanent staff.

Taking a permanent staff job does have its advantages.

Kurt Smudzinski accepted a staff job at Summit Hospital this spring because he wants to improve his skills. ``When you are a traveler no one will teach you new things,'' he said. ``Like invasive cardiac procedures, they won't give that work to travelers.'' Traveling certainly isn't a cure all for the health care profession - or even for travelers themselves. While the opportunity to see the most beautiful cities in America has been grand, many travelers will ultimately leave nursing. Charity McGriff, from Alabama, is considering law school. Debbie Jacobs, with the 360-degree view, wants something ``more 9 to 5.'' Holjes is saving money in case she wants to go back to school.

Smudzinski complains though he isn't even 30 years old, he already has chronic back pain. He's considering taking classes to become a nurse anesthetist.

First, however, he may have do a bit more traveling, he said. ``I would like to go back to Hawaii.''

Contact Rebecca Vesely at [email protected]

caroladybelle said it for me, most needs for travelers and agency are produced by managment that is not motivated for retention. I don't think supplementary staffing is necessarily bad. I have done agency but not traveling. There will always be a need for a certain amount of both, it would never be eliminated. There is not a doubt in my mind that the need could be reduced but that would require a concerted effort by managment accross the board to reduce that need and they show little sign of doing it.

Specializes in NICU.

Quote: ...Regina Harrison, a nurse at Kaiser Permanente's Oakland Medical Center, echoing a common sentiment. ``More nurses are injured because they are lifting patients and moving them by themselves because travelers won't help.''

Actually, I thought this was a very interesting article, and not all bad, but that statement above? COME ON!!! Could you MAKE a larger sweeping generalization?

We have extremely high turnover on our units for a variety of reasons: administration and unit management could give a flying hoot if their nurses are satisfied, they refuse to allow self-scheduling, the schedules we ARE given never change and there are imposed limits such as not being able to work more than three days in a row unless you're doing only eight-hour shifts, requests for education days and vacation days are always turned down, low budgets within the hospital mean we have to get creative with our nursing care, outdated philosophies, etc. I could go on for hours!

Because of these and many more reasons, we are constantly short due to high turnover and call-in's (the way the system is, in order to take one day off, people end up calling sick and bringing in a "bought" doctor's note; if you sprain your ankle, but don't go to the doctor and bring a note back, you don't get paid. Likewise if you have a cold or migraines or you name it- no note, no money.). We have new nurses who are trained then leave after one year to work in better conditions. Because they leave so quickly, managment has begun to scale back the training, basically because the time and effort ends up being for nil when they leave and you have to start all over with a new batch of new grads.

Because of all of this, we finally got some travellers in recently. We have two on contract now, one is about to go staff (with the pool), and the other one we BEGGED personally to stay a while longer because we loved her so much.

She was so tickled that we actually begged her to stay, and we went to our manager to sing her praises, because not only are we in desperate need, but we love her to death. She said that at her last facility, in California, she was treated quite badly by the staff who, when they found out what she was making, basically ostracized her and treated her horribly.

IMO, I don't care how much money they're paying travellers- whatever it is, it probably isn't enough (there really IS no such thing as a free lunch- hospitals aren't going to actually pay ANYONE what they're worth, not even in a crunch). I admire the travellers, because I wouldn't deal with half of what they have to deal with, whether they chose it or not. Not a team member? No familiarity with the basic needs like where to find things and basic protocols? Jealousy from others who wish they were making more money? Having to be so supremely flexible all of the time? It must be exhausting!

I am always surprised when people react to travellers like the ones in that article- to me, our contract nurses have been a blessing and a half and we would be up a creek without them.

Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.

AHHH....when an article generalizes like that , I stop reading right then and there, having seen it lose credibility in my eyes. My experiences w/travelers have been 90% positive. (in the many I come across, one was positively evil and dangerous and we told the agency NEVER to refer her back to us).

I treat them like GOLD--never giving my crappiest assignments to them just cause they are "there".......I want them BACK. I use the Golden Rule with travelers/agency nurses cause to me, they are like GUESTS and their impression of us COUNTS to me. I am certainly not envious of their higher pay; they work for it in my eyes and I have never worked with a traveler who refused to pull his/her weight on my unit. They literally "hit the ground running" where I work (L and D) and with very little direction/guidance at times. I brook NO resentment of travelers/agency nurses. THEY work for their MONEY JUST LIKE WE DO but stay the HECK out of "office politics" ---

GOOD FOR THEM and MORE POWER TO THEM!:)

I've worked as a "taveller" before,once doing an open ended gig which I was able to commute to from home(wonderful hours!) and then a 3 month gig.In both places I was used where needed(sometimes sent to another Unit halfway through the shift)-this I expected.

I did not expect some of the responses I received from Nurses at the faclilities when asking locations of equipment or forms to fill out,for example.These unexpected responses ranged from lazy mumblings to downright ignoring my questions.

I will,however,say that there also were some nurses who were kind and showed me the "ropes".They did not form the majority.

After a while,I did earn the trust of most nurses and took a lot of good natured ribbing from them,like if something really got screwed up,these would say"Blame it on him(me),he's the agency guy."I often referred to myself as the rent-a -nurse or as my signature reads,the ice cream man(long story going back to when I did some local agency LTC staff relief and wore all white and an obviously confused sweet old lady wanted to know who I was and what I was giving her[meds]).

I later was hired FT by this same facility I was doing the 3 month gig at and remained there 2 1/2 years.

I believe as a "traveller" or in more derogatory terms,"gypsy",one has to expect some leeriness and a little guarding or even mistrust toward the travel nurse from facility nurses.It's our nature (this can be overcome)to be suspicious of newcomers to our little work circle.As one of the replies mentions,the enduring travel nurse will stand the test of time(unless he/she is a real f--- up)and through good nursing practice/performance win the trust of MOST nurses there.

All this article does is show to others how nurses would rather bash eachother, than stand together and work as one. Shameful.

I have 2 children, one that is 19 and another that will be 15 soon. Personally I am looking forward to the day of being a "travel nurse!" I find this article not only bashing toward these travelers, but---the nurses that are doing the b------ about these travelers could have the same opportunities if they chose. are these complaints due to real problems, or complaints due to just plain jealousy???

Before I got into nursing, I worked as a traveler processing medical health claims and doing customer service. We had a lot of the same problems with locals that traveling nurses have because we got better hourly wages, per diem, guarantees about work hours, lodging, etc. And we got a lot of the problem claims, problem callers, and general work problems pushed off on us as well. In fact, you could take the original post and substitute a few words and it could be about my travel experiences processing health insurance claims.

Specializes in Community Health Nurse.

I think we should all quit our jobs and become traveling nurses. (hee-hee) :D Then, the hospitals won't have anyone to blame but themselves for the way nurses are treated by them. Just think....if every nurse did this and offered their services as independent contractors at the hospitals, nurses would no longer have to put up with crap that didn't pertain to them. Traveling nurses NEVER have to get caught up in the politics in a hospital. We show up, do our job and our time on our contracts, and move on elsewhere........sometimes we stay on if the place is decent enough to us. (speaking as a former traveling nurse........one day I may rejoin the ranks of traveling nurses for reasons such as I mentioned.) :nurse:

Specializes in OB, Telephone Triage, Chart Review/Code.

Cheerfuldoer...I have thought the same thing!

A misconception with travel nursing is that you "travel". Well, you can be a travel nurse and work in the hospital in your own town! That would show 'em!

Just think! ALL nurses would have the benefits and flexibility that "traveling" offers. The hospitals would be left holding the bag.

Personally, I think it is a wonderful idea! Not to mention the amount of extra bonus we would make referring another nurse to the agency that we contract with!

I don't see travel nursing being phased out as long as hospitals play games with us. It's a shame that nurses leave nursing, when they could "travel" and reap the rewards we so justly deserve. Travel nursing offers this to us. We are fools not to take it!!!!!

I have worked with many travel nurses and I would rather work with them than my own coworkers!

Specializes in Oncology/Haemetology/HIV.

A few for profits are trying to eliminate "local" travelers. Columbia HCA hospitals in FL caught on that they were "raiding their own supply of nurses, and supposedly will not take travelers that have a legal residence within 100 miles of the facility.

But when they get desparate enough and you have the skills, they some how ignore that rule.....

its amazing isent it?. those nurses who decide to work on staff full time get crap wages, long hours, too many weekends, and generally treated like "your lucky to have a job". these same nurses are members of the same community which the hospital serves, as well as their family so staff nurses put that little bit extra into their rapport, and delivery of care, yet they get little in return from their bosses for their loyality. now we have travellers as u call them, where we come from their agency. while their skills and dedication may be exactly the same as those nurses on staff one cannot but agree that when u dont have roots in a community, u dont have the same loyality towards it. u know your going to move on so why bother. so my point is who gets the greater award from the adminstration?. who gets a higher hourly wage?, free accomodation?, travel expense?, less hassle because they dont work their all the time. the lesson my friends is, we the nurses are to blame, only until we get up off our fat asses and demand equal wages and conditions with the travellers will we get what we deserve, until then just suck it up

I can't believe the way nurses complain about travellers' wages, benes, etc. If you aren't getting enough where you are then go elsewhere! Travel nurses have a lot of crap to deal with that staff nurses don't and they are paid accordingly. If staff nurses think travellers have it so easy, then why aren't they travel nurses too?

+ Add a Comment