President Trump was likely largest driver of COVID-19 misinformation “infodemic” per Cornell University study

Updated:   Published

Cornell University

Corona virus misinformation:quantifying sources and themes in the COVID-19‘ infodemic’

Quote

Abstract:

The COVID19 pandemic has unfolded along side what the World Health Organization has termed an “infodemic” of misinformation. This study identifies and analyzes the most prominent topics of COVID related misinformation that emerged in traditional media between January  1 and May 26,2020  based on a total sample of over 38 million articles published in English-language media around the world.  To our knowledge, our analysis is the first comprehensive survey of the traditional and online media landscape on this issue. We found that media mentions of US President Donald Trump within the context of COVID-19 misinformation made up by far the largest share of the infodemic. Trump mentions comprised 37.9% of the overall misinformation conversation, well ahead of any other topics. We conclude that the President of the United States was likely the largest driver of the COVID-19 misinformation “infodemic”. Only 16.4% of the misinformation conversation was “fact-checking” in nature, suggesting that the majority of COVID misinformation is conveyed by the media without question or correction.

 

Specializes in Med-Surg.

Trump continues on a reckless path.  

Trump with his recent attacks on Fauci, saying he's not a team player, and that he and the other idiots are just posting information that people are tired of hearing.  At least Fauci has the professionalism to say he's dong his job regardless.

He wants to focus on the fact that he banned travel from China, which ultimately was a good move.  But what else after?  Also he wants to focus on the idea that at first we were told not to wear masks and then we were.  Okay, so science does evolve and there are hits and misses but to claim that "they get everything wrong" is just maddening to me.

He is not showing leadership in my opinion.  I get not wanting to close down the economy.   No one wants that.  But at the least he should encourage people to be safe, wear masks, distance and not hold campaign rallies that could potentially infect people.  

With Covid on the rise not fitting his agenda he's now just advocating that we shut up about it, get on with our lives as if nothing is going on because we're tired of it.

I also don't rely on mainstream media for covid information other than looking at the daily numbers here in Florida and the rate of positivity for my county.   I usually look at Medscape for nurses as an evidenced based factual source.  

Specializes in Critical Care; Cardiac; Professional Development.

Thing is, literally NOBODY is suggesting we shut down the economy. Mask. Social Distance. Limit gathering sizes. Wash your hands. It is really NOT that hard.

Karma is coming for a lot of people up top.

15 hours ago, Matthew Prazak said:

References please for your comments?

This is rich coming from a person who won't even verify they have the credentials needed to be here in the first place.

Hey Tweety. Loved the thoughtful response. Seriously. It is about the first thing I read that made any sense. 

I don't completely agree. There are a few points in there that I do agree with though. The President could set a better example. He has shown reckless personal behavior in regards to the virus. I won't be following his example. I know that N95 masks work well for this virus.

The rest of it. Well, maybe not so much. I want to lay back and see how the press treats COVID after the elections. It is an election year and we all have our "tribes" that we belong to right now. Next year we might start to get some accurate information mainstreamed.

As an aside, I did find it interesting that the Alphabet companies have been attacking the President forcefully. I wonder if it had anything to do with the antitrust lawsuit that dropped yesterday? 

I have a question about Fauci. Are you aware of his blunders during the early part of the AIDS crisis? Interesting reading. Gave me a completely different picture of the guy. Not saying I dislike him. I don't hold him in the same regard though. There are a few other questionable things about Fauci that do not fit the topic of this thread. Enough to be wary of him.

Finally the press and the OP article about misinformation. Every time I see a journo pick one obscure fact out of a study and use it as clickbait I cringe. It scares the public, it is a dishonest use of information meant to be presented as a whole. Yet it makes "the news". Just like the "study" done about the President's misinformation I suppose.

Fair is fair I guess. Have a great day. Your response was appreciated. I don't always need to agree with someone to respect them and I am sure you feel the same way.

Have a great day. 

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
2 hours ago, Matthew Prazak said:

Hey Tweety. Loved the thoughtful response. Seriously. It is about the first thing I read that made any sense. 

I don't completely agree. There are a few points in there that I do agree with though. The President could set a better example. He has shown reckless personal behavior in regards to the virus. I won't be following his example. I know that N95 masks work well for this virus.

The rest of it. Well, maybe not so much. I want to lay back and see how the press treats COVID after the elections. It is an election year and we all have our "tribes" that we belong to right now. Next year we might start to get some accurate information mainstreamed.

As an aside, I did find it interesting that the Alphabet companies have been attacking the President forcefully. I wonder if it had anything to do with the antitrust lawsuit that dropped yesterday? 

I have a question about Fauci. Are you aware of his blunders during the early part of the AIDS crisis? Interesting reading. Gave me a completely different picture of the guy. Not saying I dislike him. I don't hold him in the same regard though. There are a few other questionable things about Fauci that do not fit the topic of this thread. Enough to be wary of him.

Finally the press and the OP article about misinformation. Every time I see a journo pick one obscure fact out of a study and use it as clickbait I cringe. It scares the public, it is a dishonest use of information meant to be presented as a whole. Yet it makes "the news". Just like the "study" done about the President's misinformation I suppose.

Fair is fair I guess. Have a great day. Your response was appreciated. I don't always need to agree with someone to respect them and I am sure you feel the same way.

Have a great day. 

Health professionals aren't really interested in laying back to see how the press treats covid after the election. Health professionals understand right now that covid is a serious national health emergency which has been terribly mishandled by the Trump administration. 

It's telling that your preference seems to be to accept whatever nonsense and misinformation that Trump spreads while seeking any perceived inconsistency from Fauci over decades to cast doubt upon his words.  I challenge you to apply that new Fauci standard toTrump or any of his cabal of corrupt liars. Please. Criticise the IMPOTUS for his deadly inconsistencies about covid. 

It's funny that a credible study causes you to completely dismiss their findings to focus your personal disdain upon Trump's newest punching bag, Fauci. Is it because you just don't believe that Trump would lie to the American people about covid? Anyone paying attention to what the IMPOTUS says regarding covid knew (knows) that Trump was (is) the author of lots of nonsense, spin, and fabrication. 

What's more alarming than the "alphabet companies" reporting facts or opinion critical of the IMPOTUS is the IMPOTUS suggesting that he won't transition power peacefully after he loses, openly calling the DOJ to jail his opponent, and repeatedly referring to the press as enemies of the people.  That's truly alarming when one is well enough read to recognize the similarities to Mussolini's rise to power. 

Does this count as a respectful comment?

4 hours ago, Nurse SMS said:

This is rich coming from a person who won't even verify they have the credentials needed to be here in the first place.

I’m still trying to figure out exactly which claim or claims made in this thread he thinks ought to be supported by references. Since the request for references wasn’t in response to any specific post it’s a bit of a conundrum. 

4 hours ago, Nurse SMS said:

[...]

19 hours ago, Matthew Prazak said:

References please for your comments?

This is rich coming from a person who won't even verify they have the credentials needed to be here in the first place.

I'm sorry, but what credentials are "needed to be here?"

And, as I've never verified my credentials does this mean I'm no longer welcome here?

12 minutes ago, chare said:

I'm sorry, but what credentials are "needed to be here?"

And, as I've never verified my credentials does this mean I'm no longer welcome here?

I’ve never been asked to send AN a copy of my nursing license either and I don’t believe that non-nursing individuals are forbidden to join and post. But don’t you think that when someone joins a nursing forum two weeks before your Presidential election and starts posting about politics, specifically politics in relation to a healthcare issue, it’s kind of interesting to know which flag their ship flies? Of course there is no guarantee what any of us write here is the truth, but I personally appreciate if posters in the spirit of communicating with other posters share some rudimentary details about themselves and their purpose for posting. Of course I can draw my conclusions even if those details aren’t shared, so for me they’re not really essential. Just kind of nice ?

Specializes in Critical Care; Cardiac; Professional Development.
44 minutes ago, chare said:

I'm sorry, but what credentials are "needed to be here?"

And, as I've never verified my credentials does this mean I'm no longer welcome here?

Of course not. But you aren't trying to invalidate science or call out people for having scientifically based opinions. If you were calling into question the things I know as an educated and informed, research-based nurse and then weren't willing to offer whether you have similar education, I would likely not be interested in engaging with you. I would assume you were simply here to stir up trouble. Over time I have never seen that behavior from you and it never occurred to me to ask. 

Specializes in Public Health, TB.

Throughout this entire pandemic, the president's focus has been making himself look good and winning reelection. He appeared at the task force press conferences not because he had any thing useful to present or to rally the nation to limit disease and death, but because he wanted the attention. When that attention turned negative, he stopped showing up. He spent months criticizing the previous administration for "empty cupboards" , even though he had been in office for 3 years.

Yes, masks were not promoted initially, and yet clinics and hospitals had to lock them up because the public was stealing them. And healthcare workers are still directed to reuse masks meant for single use only. But Trump still can't even say now that masks slow the spread of the virus. 

He has never mounted a coordinated strategy for testing and contact tracing, just promoted the Abbott systems. Or sure, he pressured companies to make ventilators, but I personally would rather not need one, thank you. He boasts about vaccines and cures just like a snake oil salesman. And his so-called medical expert is a radiologist. 

 

Specializes in Critical Care; Cardiac; Professional Development.
1 minute ago, nursej22 said:

Throughout this entire pandemic, the president's focus has been making himself look good and winning reelection. He appeared at the task force press conferences not because he had any thing useful to present or to rally the nation to limit disease and death, but because he wanted the attention. When that attention turned negative, he stopped showing up. He spent months criticizing the previous administration for "empty cupboards" , even though he had been in office for 3 years.

Yes, masks were not promoted initially, and yet clinics and hospitals had to lock them up because the public was stealing them. And healthcare workers are still directed to reuse masks meant for single use only. But Trump still can't even say now that masks slow the spread of the virus. 

He has never mounted a coordinated strategy for testing and contact tracing, just promoted the Abbott systems. Or sure, he pressured companies to make ventilators, but I personally would rather not need one, thank you. He boasts about vaccines and cures just like a snake oil salesman. And his so-called medical expert is a radiologist. 

 

He fires anyone who disagrees with him. Those he cannot fire, he slanders. 

His method of doing business is to chase the other team out of business. In this case, the "other team" are fellow Americans, many of whom are very vulnerable in any number of ways. 

He is openly bigoted. He was elected on a campaign platform of "he says what he means" and then has spent the last four years with people saying "He didn't mean what he said". 

He has temper tantrums in the middle of the night. In public.

He's increased the federal debt to an unsustainable amount and then proposes fixing it on the backs of the poor, the marginalized and the underrepresented. He gives tax breaks to himself and those he favors. He refuses to deal with those who don't fall in line - California fires being just the latest example. Democratic governors needing assistance with Covid not long before that. 

I could go on and on. He is a revolting, mentally ill, sick, sad man. He has massively failed this country and doesn't deserve another four years. I pray to God he goes down in all his flaming, sorry glory followed by the multitude of court fights he has coming the minute he is no longer protected by the office.

21 minutes ago, macawake said:

... But don’t you think that when someone joins a nursing forum two weeks before your Presidential election and starts posting about politics, specifically politics in relation to a healthcare issue, it’s kind of interesting to know which flag their ship flies? ...

Absolutely.  This happens every election cycle, and not just here.

26 minutes ago, macawake said:

... Of course I can draw my conclusions even if those details aren’t shared, so for me they’re not really essential. Just kind of nice ?

It's not difficult, even when they aren't as obvious as this.

Too much baloney. No. It seemed more like a string of assumptions. 

+ Join the Discussion