President Biden thread

36 minutes ago, Curious1997 said:

You are totally around the bend, aren't you? Literally, bonkers? 

I wonder if I have any aspect of my life so delusional and no one is telling me? 

Seriously, not even some of the most floridly psychotic patients I run into, have it as bad as trumpistas? 

Yes. You are delusional it's called democrat. I hope you don't treat your patients the way you talk. Do you treat them different if they are "Trumpistas"? 

13 minutes ago, Cclm said:

It seems redicoulas the hypocrisy of Biden supporters. 

How is Biden losing popularity polling points evidence of hypocrisy? Repeatedly misspelling common words is problematic for you.  Is French your first language?

2 hours ago, Cclm said:

Yes. So Biden had more time and still failed. I posted a link and highlighted Trumps plan. 

Can you offer an explanation of how you think he failed, or what you feel the significance is of the parts of Trump's plan you highlighted?

2 hours ago, Cclm said:

Just hold Biden to the scrutiny you held Trump. That's it. If any of the current issues were happening under Trump he would be a war criminal, impeach, impeach, ruined the economy, more concentration camps at the border  etc etc

I don't disagree that Biden should be held to the same standards as Trump, but based on your claims it seems pretty clear that it's not just Biden supporters that are applying different standards.  If anything comparable to why Trump was twice impeached was occurring under Biden, then absolutely he should be impeached, but at least so far Biden has not threatened a foreign leader with repercussions if they didn't publically endorse his campaign, or had multiple members of his administration who were illegally coordinating or support of Russia or Russian interests.

"Ruined the economy"?  "More concentration camps at the border"?  Maybe you could clarify what you're referring to there.

31 minutes ago, Cclm said:

I think killing a aid worker along with children with a drone strike is a "unique mistake" worth scrutiny. 

It seems redicoulas the hypocrisy of Biden supporters. 

Again, I don't disagree that when civilian losses occur in a military mission there should be investigated to help reduce the chances of it happening again, but I have no idea how you're connecting this to Biden personally.

3 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:

How is Biden losing popularity polling points evidence of hypocrisy? Repeatedly misspelling common words is problematic for you.  Is French your first language?

I think you are smart enough to figure it out. Do you know how autocotrect works? Or did you not learn that when you weren't retired? It wasn't related to hypocrisy, do you need a new eye glass subscription? 

2 hours ago, MunoRN said:

Can you offer an explanation of how you think he failed, or what you feel the significance is of the parts of Trump's plan you highlighted?

I don't disagree that Biden should be held to the same standards as Trump, but based on your claims it seems pretty clear that it's not just Biden supporters that are applying different standards.  If anything comparable to why Trump was twice impeached was occurring under Biden, then absolutely he should be impeached, but at least so far Biden has not threatened a foreign leader with repercussions if they didn't publically endorse his campaign, or had multiple members of his administration who were illegally coordinating or support of Russia or Russian interests.

"Ruined the economy"?  "More concentration camps at the border"?  Maybe you could clarify what you're referring to there.

Again, I don't disagree that when civilian losses occur in a military mission there should be investigated to help reduce the chances of it happening again, but I have no idea how you're connecting this to Biden personally.

Probably because he is the POTUS.  I learned through the last 4 years that everything bad that happens is the POTUS fault. 

Not to mention he gives the order and then brags how great it was. Then opps, he says nothing about it. Probably can't remember. 

2 hours ago, MunoRN said:

Can you offer an explanation of how you think he failed, or what you feel the significance is of the parts of Trump's plan you highlighted?

I don't disagree that Biden should be held to the same standards as Trump, but based on your claims it seems pretty clear that it's not just Biden supporters that are applying different standards.  If anything comparable to why Trump was twice impeached was occurring under Biden, then absolutely he should be impeached, but at least so far Biden has not threatened a foreign leader with repercussions if they didn't publically endorse his campaign, or had multiple members of his administration who were illegally coordinating or support of Russia or Russian interests.

"Ruined the economy"?  "More concentration camps at the border"?  Maybe you could clarify what you're referring to there.

Again, I don't disagree that when civilian losses occur in a military mission there should be investigated to help reduce the chances of it happening again, but I have no idea how you're connecting this to Biden personally.

If you read the link I provided, especially when other loud members demand sources(don't even read, looks like you don't either) then you would know what the significance of what I highlighted. 

I was referring to what ya all would be  saying if all these things happened under Trump. I imagined something like war criminal .....

Russian collusion was debuked. A hoax conspiracy theory. Lmao

37 minutes ago, Cclm said:

Probably because he is the POTUS.  I learned through the last 4 years that everything bad that happens is the POTUS fault. 

I would agree that it's not reasonable or accurate to automatically say that "everything bad that happens" is the fault of whomever is President, so then why are you saying that's the basis of your claims?

41 minutes ago, Cclm said:

Not to mention he gives the order and then brags how great it was. Then opps, he says nothing about it. Probably can't remember. 

Are you under the impression that the President is ordering each individual drone strike in Afghanistan?

36 minutes ago, Cclm said:

If you read the link I provided, especially when other loud members demand sources(don't even read, looks like you don't either) then you would know what the significance of what I highlighted. 

You highlighted a section that referenced the timeline of troop withdraw, presumably to support the idea that Trump's plan didn't involve withdrawing all troops, even though the your post confirms this was the case.  You were asked if that's what you meant and didn't respond, you instead accused others of failing to comprehend the article.  You also highlighted Trump saying that there would be repercussions if the Taliban misbehaved, suggesting it was Biden who failed to hold them to account, even though Trump had already shown this to be a hollow threat.

39 minutes ago, Cclm said:

Russian collusion was debuked. A hoax conspiracy theory. Lmao

The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee investigation concluded that "Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modem era."

Multiple members of his campaign and administration were found guilty of crimes related to their dealings with Russia and Russian interests.

This was pretty clearly not a "hoax", despite Trump referring to it as such, although you should consider the source.

4 hours ago, Cclm said:

I think you are smart enough to figure it out. Do you know how autocotrect works? Or did you not learn that when you weren't retired? It wasn't related to hypocrisy, do you need a new eye glass subscription? 

Is that an attempt to insult me? I could respond that, yes, I'm smart enough understand what you are trying to say in spite of the frequent misspellings, incorrect word usage and social media slang which suggests that maybe you don't have an eye or temperament for detail or accuracy.  That frequent inability to communicate well in the written form could be reflective of overall literacy shortcomings.  Frankly, that would explain a great deal about a majority of your comments.  

4 hours ago, Cclm said:

Russian collusion was debuked. A hoax conspiracy theory. Lmao

Are you repeating propaganda?

11 hours ago, Cclm said:

Yes. You are delusional it's called democrat. I hope you don't treat your patients the way you talk. Do you treat them different if they are "Trumpistas"? 

No! They have a mental illness. What's your excuse? 

9 minutes ago, Curious1997 said:

No! They have a mental illness. What's your excuse? 

I treat my patients with the upmost respect and provide excellent care. Regardless of their skin color, race, religion or political party. 

You have demonstrated your feelings for those in which you do not agree with. To such a degree that I cannot see you treating your patients without bias. I'm sure the angry white man with depression gets over looked by you because you are paying attention mostly to the poor "oppressed"  not white man. You know cuz they need extra help...