Published
Anyone else notice that many of their nursing students are becoming nurses as a stepping stone to being a nurse practitioner but have little interest in being a floor nurse? I'm worried we won't have bedside nurses before long.
What about those with "some experience" regardless of title?
I've been in the health field since 2015 and I have come to realization that I am interested in the pathophys, disease treatment and prevention, and chronic management of patients. I've worked as a nursing assistant (med-surg) and now as a medical assistant (urgent care). Working in both inpatient and outpatient provided two different perspectives.
I'm really drawn to outpatient and I have no desires to be a floor nurse (unless I'm in the ER). I currently function quite autonomously as a MA (I usually begin the treatment plan for patients after triaging way before I clear them for evaluation by the MD/PA/NP)...
Btw, at this urgent care we do not have nurses. The MAs function as the nurses (without the title of course). What the providers won't do, the MAs do. Anywhere from injections, med admin, neb tx, wound care, staple/suture removal, UA, submitting and interpreting labs, other point of care testing, discharging patients with after care instructions at disposition . Yes, I can see where other skills such as IV placements, catheters, and other bedside nursing skills are deficient, but none of these are done in UC. They are transferred to the ER if they are higher acuity and need complex interventions. The ability to assess and intervene as needed can be learned with time in practice, regardless of being a floor nurse or not.
Floor nurses are one of the hardest working (and underpaid) individuals I've observed and worked with and I give them my highest respect. Everyone belongs somewhere in the health field, and mine is working in either a community health center (I'm an advocate for preventive services) or ER/UC.
That said, as an NP....urgent care or primary care is where I will return to. Is it really necessary for me to be a floor nurse before becoming a FNP? I don't believe so unless I want to be a hospitalist (not interested).
Another side not, I have ZERO interest in online NP programs. I need face to face interaction. Hands on practice, assessment of my skills from faculty, and constructive criticism from someone who has directly observed me. See one do one.
PS. I was recently accepted to an ABSN program with plans on pursuing MSN-FNP right after.
Oh no. That sounds scary! I hear what everyone on this board is saying... I see both sides. I'm currently in a DNP program at the #4 school for midwifery in the country. I have a year of L&D under my belt and I dont graduate until 2020. Just based on my curriculum now, i dont see how more time in L&D and not being in school would help me. People are neglecting to realize that there are years of pre requisites before you ever even see a patient. Im taking advanced physiology, statistics and epidemiology, nursing informatics....nothing i do as a floor nurse even reaches that stuff. I plan to work my way through school because I know my experience is ESSENTIAL to midwifery. I can read a strip and intervene. I just dont think waiting would be beneficial as im in a place in my life where I can focus on grad school. When it's all said and done, I'll have 4+ years of L&D experience (and7 months of mom baby) when this program is over. Waiting would make me less likely to do it. Just my 2 cents.
Totally agree with you! Congrats and good luck on your endeavours :)
I know what school she went to, but would rather not name it. They may have changed their standards since she attended, I don't know. We (my L&D coworkers and I) were SHOCKED when we discovered this as well. It was very disheartening to us. It was fortunate that she was a kind soul and a humble person as well who did not think she was "above" learning from the floor nurses. She took what we (and of course the physicians and seasoned midwives) said to heart, listened, and truly made an effort to learn. Her bedside manner was outstanding, that I will say. Her first year was distressing for us as nurses, though.
You guys were a lot nicer than most other nurses and physicians would have been. The fact that you had to spoon feed her what orders to give is appalling. Humble and kind, fine. Neither of those two qualities alone make a safe and competent provider. Kudos to you and your co-workers for helping her.
I remember when she first came, it was specifically *because* of how she interacted with the staff that people were willing to help her out. I distinctly remember one nurse in particular who had a rep of being a real pit bull describing her as "so, so sweet." Then again one of the reasons I stayed at this particular hospital for so long was explicitly because of the people I worked with and how wonderful they were. The teamwork there was phenomenal. Yes, she probably would have been eaten alive elsewhere.You guys were a lot nicer than most other nurses and physicians would have been. The fact that you had to spoon feed her what orders to give is appalling. Humble and kind, fine. Neither of those two qualities alone make a safe and competent provider. Kudos to you and your co-workers for helping her.
I have to agree with OP. I'm in nursing school now and I do plan on becoming an APN (specifically a CRNA) in the future. Most programs I have looked at only require 1 year of ICU experience to be accepted. That blew my mind. I have friends who were in classes ahead of me who graduated and got jobs in an ICU immediately. I can't imagine getting hired, working, and moving on to start administering ANESTHESIA after only 1 year bedside.Some of my classmates have talked about doing online RN to MSN programs right after they graduate and I just cant imagine that that makes a well-rounded APN. Bedside nursing isn't really my passion either, like some others have posted, but I have a good attitude and genuinely care for my patients and I'll put my 3-5 years in so that I can be sure that I'll be the best CRNA I can be.
Having goals outside of bedside nursing isn't bad or wrong, but trying to make all that happen too quickly (before you get enough RN experience), possibly at the expense of your future patients' care is wrong. You have to ask yourself. Do I want to become a mediocre APN now? Or do I want to become an exceptional APN a little later? Seems obvious to me...
Just FYI, I interviewed at 2 programs and get rejected from both with 2 years of ICU experience, ranging from Medical, Surgical, and Cardiac ICU. The 1-year is a formality, and it is EXTREMELY difficult to get in with that little experience. Realistically, most of the applicants you are applying alongside have more like 4-5 years, their CCRNs, etc. A CCRN is almost a must now, and to even be eligible, you need roughly 1 year of ICU experience. Good luck! It's extremely challenging!
Just FYI, I interviewed at 2 programs and get rejected from both with 2 years of ICU experience, ranging from Medical, Surgical, and Cardiac ICU. The 1-year is a formality, and it is EXTREMELY difficult to get in with that little experience. Realistically, most of the applicants you are applying alongside have more like 4-5 years, their CCRNs, etc. A CCRN is almost a must now, and to even be eligible, you need roughly 1 year of ICU experience. Good luck! It's extremely challenging!
This is my understanding also to be accepted to a CRNA program. I applaud that this is the case. There's a good reason for it. And to the OP, hope you'll keep trying.
Just FYI, I interviewed at 2 programs and get rejected from both with 2 years of ICU experience, ranging from Medical, Surgical, and Cardiac ICU. The 1-year is a formality, and it is EXTREMELY difficult to get in with that little experience. Realistically, most of the applicants you are applying alongside have more like 4-5 years, their CCRNs, etc. A CCRN is almost a must now, and to even be eligible, you need roughly 1 year of ICU experience. Good luck! It's extremely challenging!
Yep and that is exactly how it should be. Competitive and demanding. I applaud the schools with these standards. Too bad more NP programs are not like this.
Yep and that is exactly how it should be. Competitive and demanding. I applaud the schools with these standards. Too bad more NP programs are not like this.
Don't misunderstand me, because I agree. I think all acute care (ICU or floor) NPs should have experience, as well as CRNAs. People argue that you can learn the acute stuff in school for NPs, but apparently not for a CRNA? If a CRNA needs the experience to critically think and act in an advanced setting, why is an NP any different?
Don't misunderstand me, because I agree. I think all acute care (ICU or floor) NPs should have experience, as well as CRNAs. People argue that you can learn the acute stuff in school for NPs, but apparently not for a CRNA? If a CRNA needs the experience to critically think and act in an advanced setting, why is an NP any different?
Exactly, IMHO.
You are no doubt foremost among men; when you walk into a room and give a speech, men grow chest hair, women curl their toes
, birds chirp :singing:and cloudy sky turns blue
revealing a twinkling sun as if it's giving you a wink--scratch that--multiple winks
;)
Now that you've spoken for the 7.7% NP's,...I digress.
CriticalACNP gave a well thought-out explanation of his opinion on the topic. You then posted something entirely rude and patronizing in response. It wasn't called for, it's poor form if you wish to engage in debate, and he didn't deserve it. Not appropriate.
CriticalACNP, thank you for your post and point of view, it is appreciated by many.
quazar
603 Posts