Published
Wondering if there are any nurses on here working without health insurance? Does your employer provide this?
I am even more stunned and disgusted by the USA health insurance system everytime I read another post! Move to Australia is all I can say!(isn't America supposed to be the land of the free????!)
No hon, America is the land of the poor any more. And if I knew how to get a job in nursing downunder.......I'd fly out in a min..........got an suggestions? :)
How Pitiful.....Nurses who don't have/can't afford Health Insurance but in turn take care of MANY people who have Sucked off the system their entire lives.....[/quote']I took care of a Medicaid pt who told me they were having surgery for a mouthful of dental implants. All courtesy of the state. I have insurance, but that's an option I can't afford. Funny, I have a full time job, pay taxes, have insurance, and can't afford what that pt got for free.
I am even more stunned and disgusted by the USA health insurance system everytime I read another post! Move to Australia is all I can say!(isn't America supposed to be the land of the free????!)
Well it's not all awful there and nor is it a bed of roses here.
We do have waits often and not all treatment is available for us. Our system is good at giving basic care and not so good at implementing latest procedures for those issues that fall out of the average spread.
Patients with (lots of) money often travel to the US for specific treatment that they can't receive here
The US cancer survival rates are better than ours.
And it's my understanding that there isn't so much age-related rationing in the US.
Hmmm, I have popped out a baby and can't get medicaid. I can only get it if I get pregnant again, then it's cancelled 8 weeks post-partum. My hubby is on SSD and has medicare which only helps if he is ever hospitalized. He had a brain tumor removed which is why he is on disability in the first place and can't afford to do any of the follow ups he was/is supposed to do. Medicare doesn't pay for as much as people think. Once I finally get a job I'll take the employer plan because right now not having insurance sucks. I guess I'm one of those people posters on here say "suck the system" since when I can't see my pcp I end up at the ER. We do try to pay the bill, but can only afford token payments....but they are getting something. And since I have pre-existing conditions private insurance is a no go.
People just don't get how embarassing it is to go to the ER for something you know should be seen by your pcp. But if you get sick before your hubby's check comes in ONCE A MONTH your screwed.
Sorry, but I had to vent a little.
I don't understand the number of people saying they are not being covered for pre-existing conditions. So long as you've been continuously insured (which they define as less than a 60 day lapse in coverage) you cannot be turned down for a pre-existing condition for more than 12 months of your new policy. And they can only look back 6 months for pre-existing conditions; if you haven't been treated for it in 6 months it's not a "pre-existing condition." It's the primary purpose of HIPAA, despite all the yakking we do about the other side of HIPAA (patient privacy). Sounds like some of you need to start filing appeals or lawyer up!
why would you tell someone that a rate would increase every six months?
or that you're going to pay more as you get older??? all members of the same employer health plan pay the same premium (save smokers vs. non-smokers). the premium for all employees may increase (as we have undoubtedly all experienced) but it's not going to increase for one person just because they're older.
i think some people need to bring themselves up to speed in health care law. even if someone has worked at the same place for 20 years, i would have at least thought they'd still know a little bit about the enactment of hipaa in 1996.
I am under my husbands insurance. We pay 26.00/wk for family coverage health/dental/vision. $300 deductible per person and no co-pay for office visits. Everything else is covered 80%. I tell him over and over how lucky he is to have such good insurance. Insurance through my employer (a hospital) would be about $600.00 a month (and not NEARLY as good of coverage.)
I don't understand the number of people saying they are not being covered for pre-existing conditions. So long as you've been continuously insured (which they define as less than a 60 day lapse in coverage) you cannot be turned down for a pre-existing condition for more than 12 months of your new policy. And they can only look back 6 months for pre-existing conditions; if you haven't been treated for it in 6 months it's not a "pre-existing condition." It's the primary purpose of HIPAA, despite all the yakking we do about the other side of HIPAA (patient privacy). Sounds like some of you need to start filing appeals or lawyer up!
Thank you redheadnurse! I was just scrolling through the thread to see if someone had posted this rebuttal. I wish people wouldn't post what they don't understand.
VioletKaliLPN, LPN
1 Article; 452 Posts
why would you tell someone that a rate would increase every six months?