MSN vs DNP

Anonymous1257 · Mar 8, 2015

I think it'll be unlikely that companies will start requiring MSN prepared APRNs to go back and get their DNP. A few big reasons I can think of off the top of my head are...

1) a DNP won't be able to bill for a single cent more than an MSN, so there's no financial incentive for businesses

2) there is no data to support that DNPs are safer than MSN APRNs, but there IS lots of data (or so I've been led to believe) supporting efficacy of BSN prepared RNs compared to ADNs, hence the push in that area

3) there are currently no government incentives, like "magnet status," that involve the DNP

llg, PhD, RN · Mar 10, 2015

I don't think any major changes are coming soon ... but ... in the long run, the people with more education will be at an advantage for certain types of jobs. That has been the historical trend in a wide variety of careers, not just nursing. To think that nursing will not follow that same common societal path with respect to the DNP is a little disingenuous.

Exactly how it will play out is anybody's guess -- and it will probably vary by geographic region and specialty. So it comes down to the specific conditions of your personal situation. For example:

1. How many career years do you have left?

2. Do you live in a region with lots of DNP programs?

3. Do you live in a region that has historically been "early adopters" of new programs of education, certification, etc.? How has your region handled the whole ADN/BSN issue? Graduate degrees for managers, staff development, etc.? Has your region been quick to increase the educational requirements for other nursing career paths? Or have they been slow?

4. What are your specific career hopes? Do you plan to get a job in a clinic and spend the rest of your career in that one place -- and is that a reasonable plan for your area? Or do you anticipate that you may find yourself in the job market a couple of times in your future career?

5. How likely is it that you will move to another region?

Etc. etc. etc. I believe that at this point, your decision should take your personal situation into account as the major factor -- more so than the national trends. Those national trends will take years to play out and there is likely to be a lot of variation for a significant period of time.

Advanced Practice Columnist / Guide · Mar 10, 2015

The current status of the DNP transition still makes it very reasonable to pursue the Master's degree. Just look at the latest survey results released by AACN (AACN, 2014). I think the meat in this survey is all in table 3.1 of the full text which surveyed 408 APRN program offerings including those that are online in 2014 and summarizes as:

BSN to MSN only programs: 284 (69.6%)

Combination of BSN to MSN and BSN to DNP programs: 81 (19.9%)

BSN to DNP only programs: 43 (10.5%)

There are certainly schools labelled as "enthusiastic early adopters" of the DNP only option but they are still small compared to the total number of programs. Even adding the "cautious adopters" schools to the mix that offer both MSN and DNP options as entry level APRN programs do not make a majority. The bulk of the current APRN offerings are still in schools labelled as "traditionalists" with MSN only options.

NJprisonrn · Mar 10, 2015

My personal feeling is that I worked quite a bit to get my MSN. I'd like to focus on building my professional and clinical skills. In the future I may pursue DNP, but I think it would cheapen the experience to rush through to get it now just because. I have had no trouble finding a job. I see no reason to add to my current student loan debt. As a young provider, I have a lot to learn and many years to practice. I think I have plenty of time to pursue the terminal degree when I am more established.

sauce · Mar 11, 2015

well if dnp was free or lead to a good amount of more money id do it. but it doesn't seem either of those are available so.

babyNP., APRN · Mar 11, 2015

I got my MSN because my school that I wanted to go to did not offer a DNP. But it turned out to be a good choice for me. I'm working as a new NP now and because my employer will give me a couple of thousand in tuition benefits, I'm planning on taking one class a semester and will just complete it slowly over the next few years. Since I have a 30+ year career ahead of me, I definitely want to do it, but not at the expense of burning myself out from school and starting a new career.

ericseitz · Mar 12, 2015

The University of Washington is one of those "early adopters", and all their NP/CNS/CNM degrees are all DNPs now. The only programs that we have that are masters level now are an MSN in community health nursing and nursing informatics. I am still dubious about this move, but it is definitely trying to align with the recommendations from the 2010 IOM report, creating degree parity, leadership skills, and practice inquiry. Makes sense, but its a bold move.

allennp · Mar 12, 2015

I would if I was young..less than 50? and starting a program, just seems to make sense though I agree with all the above posts.

Doesn't though the university of Washington allow a person to obtain a MSN mid school track? And exit if they wish? I seem to recall someone one doing that.

ericseitz · Mar 12, 2015

That may be correct, although the curriculum starts with all the DNP-based classes, which are all non-track specific class where all DNPs take classes together, regardless of track. Second and third year are track-specific years.

sheyjay · Mar 12, 2015

Doesn't though the university of Washington allow a person to obtain a MSN mid school track? And exit if they wish? I seem to recall someone one doing that.

Only those who were in the previous 1.0 curriculum can get a Masters in Passing. Those who are in the new 2.0 curriculum no longer have that option anymore.

Muse4723 · Mar 15, 2015

http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/DNP-Study.pdf