Media a bit too invasive of nurse's personal info following her catching Ebola?

Published

Specializes in Rehab, Med-surg, Neuroscience.

Am I the only one who feels very uncomfortable reading this article about the Texan nurse who caught Ebola on the job? Or is this ethically ok because of the availability of information these days?

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ebola-virus-outbreak/who-nina-pham-meet-nurse-who-contracted-ebola-n224726

No, you’re not the only one.

If a “close family friend” hadn’t felt an irresistible urge (is there $$$ to be made?) to confirm her identity to the media, this nurse and her family and friends would have had

the chance to fight this battle in private, without the media and Joe public bugging them. Even with the confirmation media isn't forced to publish a person's name, it's a choice they made. Shameful in my opinion.

I’m assuming that the nurse and her family wish to remain anonymous, if they want the media attention than that’s a different story. That’s of course her/their choice to make. I doubt that she/they’d need an anonymous “close family friend” to confirm her identity though, if they felt that the media attention was desirable.

Identifying her name and area of residence will likely not bring anything positive for them. The Spanish nurse’s aide infected with Ebola had droves of curious looky-loos around her apartment as she was being cared for in hospital.

Specializes in Nurse Leader specializing in Labor & Delivery.

That article made me sick. What it wrote about how "she got her nursing license in 2010 but didn't get her CCRN until two months before caring for the Ebola patient" as if to put her competence into question. And then the comments about her Facebook/Pinterest accounts. I am livid on behalf of this woman. What a horrible, piece-of-**** article.

AND the article tells you the brick color and general geographical location of her home!

Don't get sick, folks! What a mess for this young nurse to have to deal with early in her career! I hope some of the older nurses in her life will step up and help her figure this out. Few others will "get it."

Oh, wait! The CDC spokesperson DID say he didn't mean it as judgment on the nurse. He needs a new "talking points" person to prep his news releases; the person writing the current ones is doing a crap job!

Specializes in LTC, med/surg, hospice.

Did they have to identity her so that those who may have had contact would know about a possible risk?

Specializes in ICU/PACU.

I read that article. It was basically an account of someone online stalking her Facebook and pinterest, google mapping her parents address and then googling what CCRN is. Ridiculous.

Specializes in CCU, SICU, CVSICU, Precepting & Teaching.

Don't blame the journalist -- blame the "close personal friend" who gave him all that personal information. And the "news organization" that published it.

But yes, I think there's a lot too much information revealed about this nurse, and too much blame affixed directly on her.

Specializes in Emergency, ICU.
I read that article. It was basically an account of someone online stalking her Facebook and pinterest, google mapping her parents address and then googling what CCRN is. Ridiculous.

Exactly. Real nice reporting there.

Ugh!

I hope they offer her a lot of money for exclusive interviews after she's discharged. (I've got high hopes and prayers for her!)

Specializes in Med-Surg, Tele, Ortho-Trauma.

But yes, I think there's a lot too much information revealed about this nurse, and too much blame affixed directly on her.

i absolutely agree with what Ruby Vee has said. I find it sickening that this nurse's privacy and competence have been hung out to dry like this. Makes me very angry.

I hate the implication that she had her CCRN only two months before caring for the ebola patient, does that really matter??? A nurse does not have to have the CCRN to care for a highly infectious disease, but to accuse her in this manner is ridiculous and just shows how little the media understands about nursing. So much for the anonoymous family friend. Total invasion of privacy.

Specializes in Rehab, Med-surg, Neuroscience.

I'm glad I'm not the only one! Reading the article made me feel like I know more about this poor woman than I do about presidential candidates during election season. Too much information!

I guess I'm an outlier on this, but, given the massive, widespread dissemination of personal details, gossip, (and conspiracy theories) about Mr. Duncan, why does she deserve any more privacy than he got? I don't recall anyone suggesting that every private detail of his life and condition should not be public. This is the world we live in now. "Privacy" is apparently an irrelevant, outdated concept.

+ Join the Discussion