Published
I second what has already been said- look at local job postings. If they are only hiring BSN nurses then you have your answer- you need to go for your BSN. A lot of hospitals are trying to move towards Magnet status which requires a certain percentage of BSN nurses. On the other hand if you live in an area that has no problem with ADN nurses, then you could potentially save yourself a lot of money by getting an ADN. There could even be the potential to have some or all of your BSN paid for by work if you decide on ADN.
I say whoever starts you first but plan on eventually earning a BSN. So if you start in an ADN program, immediately start researching what you would need to complete an RN to BSN program. Most ADN programs are partnered with other schools that will accept all if not most of their credits.
BSN especially if you want to become a more advanced nurse.
I don't get why people say that. If people are waiting 2 years to get into a BSN program or are shelling out a lot more money, getting the ADN and then completing a RN to BSN transition program seems to almost make more sense. Most community colleges are cheaper and it is easy to get a BSN. It took me less time to get my associates and then complete my BSN than a traditional 4 year program. Plus I earned a year of experience in the meantime.
Researching is far more important and planning ahead then just getting a BSN.
Irena67
6 Posts
If I am not planning on pursuing a higher career (i.e. NP or PA) what are the costs and benefits of each degree? I know that the salaries are similar but do they vary by years of experience? Are there any other differences?