Updated: Published
How have you expressed your displeasure about their choice? Are you questioning why they have not been terminated yet?
"Choice and consent are integral parts of medical care, there are legal, professional and ethical obligations but how can this be addressed with coercion...."
I watched the video near the bottom of this law firms home page - very informative and relevant to Australian and overseas national laws and the way in which healthcare is delivered.
1 hour ago, AreYouReallySure said:There are more than 12,000 Drs in Brazil working at the coal face using a protocol. So yes Baloney, there is a protocol that is being used.
This is Fact, not a belief.
If it's fact you should have no trouble linking to the reputable science that outlines the therapy in Brazil. There is currently no evidence published that ivermectin is useful in treatment of covid.
3 hours ago, AreYouReallySure said:There is no room in science for maybe's or beliefs.
There are more than 12,000 Drs in Brazil working at the coal face using a protocol. So yes Baloney, there is a protocol that is being used.
This is Fact, not a belief.
I have personally worked with a Brazilian trained specialist in gynaecological-oncological surgery. He is equal to the task as compared to his Australian trained peers, so I have no doubt that ALL Brazilian Drs are in general terms, equal to the task in being able to identify "if" a treatment protocol works or is a complete waste of time.
Brazil is in a terrible predicament caused by Bolsinaro's bromance with Trump. Lots of misinformation and no money for expensive antibody treatments. So they have a large customer base for Ivermectin and nothing else to offer. Just because they are doing a study doesn't mean it will be effective. They are desperately looking for something cheap and quick because Bolsinaro won't permit other mitigation measures except for lockdowns. If it were effective, I would think we would have learned something from India but ...nothing.... which leads me to believe that it was another dud. They are still using HCQ in Brazil because of Bolsinaro and that hasn't worked either. And I'm not sure how much we can trust 1 study from 1 university. If it did work, we would still need more studies behind it. I think most countries would prefer vaccine if they were able to get it.
23 hours ago, AreYouReallySure said:Your logic is skewed.
Ask yourself if a vaccinated person can catch covid?
Can a vaccinated individual, healthcare worker or not spread the virus?
If the answer is no to both questions, your logic is sound.
No one said the vaccine would offer complete immunity only protection from severe disease.You have a higher likelihood of catching Covid from an unvaccinated person than one vaccinated because antibodies.Do a little more research.
20 minutes ago, SmilingBluEyes said:Please elaborate.
Full Definition of insidious
1a: having a gradual and cumulative effect : SUBTLEthe insidious pressures of modern life
b: of a disease : developing so gradually as to be well established before becoming apparent
__________________
All this rhetoric is going to amount to more division on top of the division that's already infecting us.
6 minutes ago, SmilingBluEyes said:OK so you are saying the disease is insidious?
PS--- I know the definition of insidious. I wanted you to elaborate on your viewpoint.
I put the definition for context as to mitigate confusion. Multiple ways to use the word. No disrespect intended.
_______
and no. The rhetoric this post is, and incites, is insidious. The rhetoric will accumulate more division.
AreYouReallySure
33 Posts
I am sorry I misrepresented myself.
What I meant, was everyone has a sad story....
Such as when my child died of respiratory distress. And the whole story about that. Which is no business to anyway here by the way.
He said she said. 1 case study after another....
I appreciate your correcting my poor communication by the way.