Published
I am a nursing student. During class I mentioned a first and middle name of a pt in class but did not give any information that I knew it from the hospital setting. All I said is a woman named her child ___ ____. Its a small town and it was one students niece which she stated in class and then went and filed a HIPPA complaint to the woman over the program. I was kicked out of the program for this. Is there anything I can do to fight this??? I need some serious help!!!!
I thought even with birth announcements the parents had to sign or verbal state that it was okay to release the information of the child's birth?Maybe not? I know I had to sign a form agreeing to the announcement.
Either way I meant to say I do wish you the best with your situation.
Having the baby photos on many sites can be 'pubic' or friends/family only . The hospital doesn't just post the photos. It's the parent's choice.
As others mentioned, disclosure of just a name is NOT a HIPAA violation. As a matter of fact, hospitals usually confirm the names of patients in their institutions, and give a condition (guarded vs stable), along with their room number if you want it. However, if the class discussion then delved into the child's birth weight, APGAR, et cetera, then you've crossed over the line.
What medical information was revealed?
Apparently OP said she never gave any medical information (infact no information at all), just stating that a mother named her child Mary Jane/John Doe...not even the last name.
OP i hope this classmate was also disciplined because how many info discussed in class has she told other relatives or acquaintances of hers.
Identifiers
This lists the identifiers specifically appearing in the HIPAA privacy regulations. The presence of any one of these identifiers renders health information individually identifiable.
HIPAA De-identification requires removal of all such identifiers as specifically defined in the regulations. It is not equivalent to the more general concept associated with the term 'anonymous'.
The following identifiers of the individual or of relatives, employers, or household members of the individual the asterisk I* indicates permitted in a limited dataset 164.514(e)(2)):
(A) Names (unless specifically released by written permission)
(B)* All geographic subdivisions smaller than a State, including street address, city, county, precinct, zip code, and their equivalent geocodes, except for the initial three digits of a zip code if, according to the current publicly available data from the Bureau of the Census:
(1) The geographic unit formed by combining all zip codes with the same three initial digits contains more than 20,000 people; and
(2) The initial three digits of a zip code for all such geographic units containing 20,000 or fewer people is changed to 000.
[Limited dataset must exclude postal address information other than town or city, state and zip code]
©* All elements of dates (except year) for dates directly related to an individual, including birth date, admission date, discharge date, date of death; and all ages over 89 and all elements of dates (including year) indicative of such age, except that such ages and elements may be aggregated into a single category of age 90 or older;
(D) Telephone numbers
(E) Fax numbers
(F) Electronic mail addresses
(G) Social security numbers
(H) Medical record numbers
(I) Health plan beneficiary numbers
(J) Account numbers
(K) Certificate/license numbers
(L) Vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, including license plate numbers
(M) Device identifiers and serial numbers
(N) Web Universal Resource Locators (URLs)
(O) Internet Protocol (IP) address numbers
(P) Biometric identifiers, including finger and voice prints
(Q) Full face photographic images and any comparable images (unless written permission obtained)
®* Any other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code, except as permitted by paragraph © of this section; If the algorithm for creating a "code" is disclosed to the recipient of the information, then the code is considered a unique identifier. The code is also considered a unique identifier if it is generated from any of the identifiers, or pieces of the identifiers, listed above.
http://hipaa.wisc.edu/trainingstudents.html
In order for PHI to be considered de-identified under the Privacy Rule, all of the following identifiers of the patient or of relatives, employers, or household members of the patient, must be removed:
Safeguarding PHI
The Privacy Rule requires you to "safeguard" PHI at your training site. Use the following practices to ensure Privacy Rule compliance.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has issued another set of HIPAA rules (the Security Rules) regarding safety and security of electronic data files and computer equipment. In the next few months you will be hearing more about electronic safeguards and how the HIPAA Security Rules may affect you at clinical training sites.
Use Only the Minimum Necessary Information
When you use PHI, you must follow the Privacy Rule's minimum necessary requirement by asking yourself the following question: "Am I using or accessing more PHI than I need to?" If you are unsure of the PHI you may use or access while providing health care for a patient at your training site, please contact your preceptor, supervisor or the HIPAA Privacy Officer at your training site
Discussing PHI With a Patient's Family Members
Before you may discuss a patient's condition, treatment or other PHI with his or her family member, it must be determined if the patient would object to such a disclosure. You should confirm with your supervisor that the patient has agreed to allow or in some other way has expressed no objection to such disclosures before you may discuss a patient's condition, treatment, or other PHI with his/her family members.
Patients' Rights Under the Privacy Rule
Each training site covered by the HIPAA Privacy Rule will have policies and procedures for implementing the following patient rights under the Privacy Rule:
It's a touchy subject.......and HIPAA is a Federal mandate and has a very limited state by state variation. I think the OP needs to check her schools HIPAA training and policies as these both have come from nursing schools.....
just saying......
Yes it is a violation of the baby. The fact you stated their name is violation, even though you didn't share information. This would be no different then be going to someone after work and saying
"Hey Sally Sue is in the hospital. she was my patient. But i can't share anymore than that."
^What if "sally sue" didn't want that information shared with anyone? Violation!!!!!!! i DID share information about "sally sue" i shared she was in the hospital.
Never and I say Never talk about others, including clinical experience using names of any kind, not even a nickname because I have found, the world is very small and someone always knows the other!
Sorry you got kicked out, but you know the Hippa Law! You are a student and you should have been severely reprimanded, maybe not kicked out, but hey, you do know the Hippa thing, right?
but you know the Hippa Law!
Yeah, that one too!
Anyway, I have a few thoughts here. If the name of the baby was published in the newspaper (or some other publication) then just saying the name, with no other health information, is not a HIPAA violation per se. If the OP said the name and then said something about the baby's health/treatment, then it would be a violation.
The problem here might be saying the name to somehow ridicule the name. It seems wierd to me to just mention, "oh yeah, I saw there was a lady who named her baby 'Karen Ann.'" (for those wondering, I don't have a friend or pt that I know has that name :) I mention this to avoid further violations). It seems much more likely that the name was brought up because it was unusual/funny sounding/etc. In that case, I can see why the classmate was upset that someone seemed to be making fun of her relative for the name they chose for their child. That is not a HIPAA violation, but it is really bad taste and worthy of a reprimand...although, probably not to be dismissed from the program.
Cat_RN, ASN, BSN, RN
298 Posts
Since when is a name private medical information?
Oy vey.
Us nurses are such criminals aren't we.. :icon_roll