Published
It doesn't hurt to apply, and keep in mind that the person who writes the postings are often not the person doing the hiring, and they may not necessarily agree.
I worked at a facility where there was a hiring freeze on BSNs, only ADNs were being hired, yet all the postings said "BSN preferred". This is because the postings were written by a CNS, yet the hiring was done by unit managers.
If it says "preferred," then go ahead and apply.
If it says "required" and if you feel you are a strong applicant despite the lack of BSN (e.g., certifications, special skills, experience, bilingual, etc.), then go ahead and apply.
But if it says "required" and you don't feel you are a strong candidate (e.g., inexperienced, switching specialties, etc.)...probably not. If you really really really want the position, go ahead and apply anyway, but don't get your hopes up that it will get past HR. Though you never know...
Definitely apply. It could never hurt and the worst that happens is you don't get the job and continue applying places. Preferred vs. Required are not the same as stated above. Most jobs in my area say BSN preferred with some required. I still applied and am happy I did because I landed the job I really wanted. Take the chance/opportunity to apply and you may be suprised with the outcome:yes::)
One thing to keep in mind, some places may require you to complete your BSN within a specified time frame. Where I work, it's 5 years. However, we have tuition reimbursement for a large chunk of it and scheduling around my classes was never a problem. So it's been a win-win situation for me.
nursewall-e
19 Posts
Curious what the general consensus is regarding the matter. Please weigh in.