Published
It's legit. Not overtime because you do 36 hours the first week. The last two shifts fall into the second week. You can ask your employer to not group your shifts together like that as a preference. Most people at my work don't like doing more than 3 in a row. Sorry you got stuck with that many.
At the facility I am at, some employees chose this way, it gave them a "mini" vacation sort of between working shifts. The facility cracked down and said we cannot work more than 4 12 hour shifts without a day off. If I am not mistaken, labor laws only state OT when more than 40 hours within a pay period. These are federal, not state laws. CA laws may be more strict, I don't know. Union contracts can dictate as well as long as they are at least to federal standards.
That would be overtime in my world. Wouldn't matter one bit when it fell from one week into the next, or one pay period into the next.Anything after 4 consecutive 12 hour shifts or 6 consecutive 8 hour shifts is OT in my union.
Yes, well Canada is more civilized with more employee rights and benefits.
wishiwereanurse, BSN, RN
265 Posts
does anyone know if it is legal in california to give employees 5 straight 12hr shifts in 2 consecutive weeks and not give overtime?
like let's say you're working thurs, fri, sat, sun, mon
coworkers said it's not overtime because you are working 3 days on a week and 2 days on another week...but i've always thought that if they make you work consecutive like that then they should give u overtime bec within 7 days you worked consecutive 5 days..
i dunno about y'all but after 3 consecutive 12 hrs shift, i feel like i've been run over by a thousand cows already..