Are your kids back to school full time in person?

Specialties School

Published

I would love to hear from you all who work in states/districts where students have been back FT in person for several weeks.  What have your numbers been like?  Have you had to shut down and reopen?  Has there been significant spikes in cases and hospitalizations in your area since the start of schools?

I am in MA where nearly every district is either fully remote or some sort of hybrid.  My own district which is "red" this week after being "yellow" the past several weeks is still planning on bringing back K-3 in November.  There is a big divide b/c the teachers are fighting to remain status quo which is remote other than our neediest students.  The school nurses are about 50/50 in terms of move forward with bringing back or remain status quo.  Admin wants to bring them all back. 

In my home district where my kids attend, they are hybrid- in person two half days a week.  As a parent I REALLY want them back in person as soon but safely and reasonably as possible. They are easily able to be more than 6" in the classrooms, classes are small (anywhere from 7-10 students), mandatory masks, one way hallways, etc., etc.   So far this has been working really well.  That being said, I think everyone is nervous about ruining a good thing.

I guess I am thinking if those of you who have been back FT (like those schools in GA that were all over the news in August) and the numbers/cases have remained steady, why would opening up more in the Northeast be any different.  Not sure if this is coming across correctly, hopefully it is.  Would love to hear your experience since being back FT- pros/cons, etc.

Specializes in kids.
On 10/16/2020 at 11:10 AM, k1p1ssk said:

My daily visit #s are waaay down, but I attribute this to students in-house getting more attention due to their smaller class sizes. Some classes only have 4 students in house on any given day. I truly believe a lot of my previous years visits were kids just needing breaks and making up vague illness complaints to leave the room. 

I have no doubt they

1) are avoiding me like the plague

2) many visits were BS visits to start with!

And many of my FFs took the remote option for the first part of the year.

Texas. In person since Aug.17 with the option for virtual. Currently only 19% are still virtual. 8000 students on campuses and 1500 employees. 48 total cases with In person since 8/17/20.

3 hours ago, NutmeggeRN said:

Community transmission is what is going to do us in. We have a local hockey rink that has been a ? show.

Totally heard about that on NECN

3 hours ago, JenTheSchoolRN said:

This is what I fear as well. We cannot control what happens outside the school building. 

So I spent my morning at one of our local schools working the flu clinic.  Half a block away was a police officer and several construction workers doing road work.  Not a single mask.  Not ONE.  All right on top of each other.  And our mayor is already going nuts with the huge influx of visitors in the past couple months- masks are mandatory in our entire city. If the police aren't even wearing them, what kind of example are they setting...

Thanks for all the responses- really interesting to read about everyone's regional experience. 

CT here. Everyone was given the choice of in-person or fully virtual.  For those who didn't choose the fully virtual option, High school has been hybrid (in-person on M/T for cohort A or TH/F for cohort B) with middle and elementary in-person 5 days/week.  We went back to school September 1, and I don't think there have been any cases with staff or students.  Granted, I'm a parent not a school nurse, so there's the possibility that there have been cases I don't know about, but I doubt it because we've been getting weekly updates from administration and I'm in parent facebook groups, and there's been no news of any classes having to quarantine.

That said, community transmission is up in the state.  My district is not in one of the outbreak locations, but I think we will see increased activity in the coming months. It's only a matter of time before we'll see students and/or teachers testing +. I just put in my schedule requests for late November/early December, and I've got myself working every M and T, because my kids have been assigned to cohort A if we have to pull back to hybrid, so I'm trying to be home for the days they're likely to be doing remote learning.

AZ here.  We have been virtual (except for a few ELL and special ED kids), but tomorrow is day 1 of hybrid model.  In my school 45% of families chose hybrid,  50% decided to stay completely online through the end of the year, and 5% haven't responded.  The hybrid kids are split into two groups....so basically, we should only have about a quarter of our student population on campus at any given time. 

Given how overcrowded and underventilated our classrooms normally are, I hope this low in-person attendance will give us a fighting chance to get through the Winter without disaster.  The last couple weeks our city's case counts and PCR+ rates have started to creep back up, as they have in many places.

Our school is working class, almost all families of color, and my city was a huge hotspot with full hospitals this Summer...as a result I think our parents are taking COVID a lot more seriously than in some other districts, where I see wealthier white folks demanding in-person education regardless of level of community spread.

Fingers crossed for all of us.   

Specializes in oncology.
On 10/16/2020 at 8:06 AM, NutmeggeRN said:

. But we also allowed seniors who are on track to graduate to take what they need and not be here for filler classes.

Unusual 'diss' on the courses that round out a thing called an 'educated person". These 'filler' courses help to expand a teenager's mind, help them explore the arts and the worled around them. What are you considerin as substantial courses versus filler? Be aware your opinion that downgrades the arts and humanities is transmitted to your children

21 minutes ago, londonflo said:

Unusual 'diss' on the courses that round out a thing called an 'educated person". These 'filler' courses help to expand a teenager's mind, help them explore the arts and the worled around them. What are you considerin as substantial courses versus filler? Be aware your opinion that downgrades the arts and humanities is transmitted to your children

While I'm sure @NutmeggeRN meant no harm against the arts, when schools went virtual many had to decide to cut (or make optional) classes that aren't tied to standardized testing and state/federal funding.  It is a sad reality, but kids just don't have the attention span to sit through a full day on a screen.  That being said, my sister is a middle school art teacher and she's back in person.  She's said the kids have a new appreciation for their art classes and are really enjoying expressing themselves artistically and getting their eyes off screens while in her class.

Specializes in kids.
55 minutes ago, londonflo said:

Unusual 'diss' on the courses that round out a thing called an 'educated person". These 'filler' courses help to expand a teenager's mind, help them explore the arts and the worled around them. What are you considerin as substantial courses versus filler? Be aware your opinion that downgrades the arts and humanities is transmitted to your children

No diss intended at all, my apologies.

I would give anything to be able to play in an orchestra again.  I took music lessons in school from 4th through 10th grade, when I quit because it was "college, then career" time.  There was one boy who particularly excelled.  Concertmaster in every venue throughout school.  In vain, through the years, I have looked for his name associated with some renowned musical group.  When I finally located him, hmmmph, he became a doctor.  Wonder if he found time for music while in premed, or just when did he quit? He could have played professionally.  Most likely would never have learned about his talent had there not been music in my city and county's schools.  We had PE and driver's ED too.  Our parent's school tax dollars went further it seems.

Specializes in oncology.
15 minutes ago, caliotter3 said:

When I finally located him, hmmmph, he became a doctor.  Wonder if he found time for music while in premed, or just when did he quit? He could have played professionally.

A majority of med students have also learned to read music/play an instrument. There is something about musical beats with a math component. Also they learn discipline. I took a course on this years ago but that is all I remember!

Quite a few MDs I know learned an instrument and had to make a tough decision b/t music or medicine. 

When I go to our symphony concerts, I see many health care professionals.

+ Add a Comment