A Deep Dive into NCLEX Next Generation 2023

The NCSBN has decided to make changes to the NCLEX in April 2023, called NCLEX Next Generation. The possible impacts of these changes are explored, including the impact on nursing students, finances, and the nursing profession as a whole. Nursing Students NCLEX Knowledge

Updated:   Published

At a time when the necessity for nurses is at an all-time high, is it reasonable to restructure the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX)? What are the implications of changing a national licensing test for one of the most in-demand professions? 

A Walk Down Memory Lane

Our veteran nurses once sat in desks lined up next to hundreds of other students, #2 pencil in hand, while test proctors walked up and down the aisles as they scrupulously bubbled in their answers. Test questions were identical to those of their neighbor, and there were booklets to separate the specialized nursing topics. 

Boards were only offered a few times per year, it took months to get the results, and you often had to travel out of state. Times have changed! The NCLEX is now an adaptive test that learns your weaknesses in real-time. You can get the results in less than a few days and take the test not far from your hometown. 

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCBSN) took charge of nurse licensing in 1978, and the boards were named the NCLEX (National Council Licensure Examination) in 1982. Computer adaptive testing (CAT) was officially implemented on April 1st, 1994. 

What Changes are Coming?

Prospective nurses taking the NCLEX after 2017 may remember a 'special research' section at the end. The research section took approximately 30 minutes and did not count toward the tester's score. The research conducted was intended to study and legitimize a new way to test future nurses. The new method moved away from the traditional nursing process and towards clinical judgment and decision-making. 

The NCLEX Next Generation new NCLEX format starts on April 1st, 2023, where the results of those years of research will culminate in a new NCLEX format called NCLEX NGN (Next Generation). Fortunately, this model will allow partial credit for qualifying answers. Check out the NCLEX Next Generation example items of the new types of questions that NCLEX will be offering, including extended drag-and-drops, highlighting, and grids: Next Generation NCLEX – Are You Ready?

Less fortunately, this test format will change the framework under which the NCLEX has operated. The new model of judgment and decision-making, called the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (NCJMM), may require changes in the thinking patterns of prospective nurses. 

The nursing process as it stands follows the ADPIE method: Assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the NCJMM method follows a new structure of recognizing clues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes. While both take the core concepts of noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting, the NCJMM has decided to package this differently.

Student Impact

Nursing students not only juggle clinicals, tests, and labs, but will now need to ponder whether their school curriculum has set them up for success. Will their instructors have the resources needed to pivot their test questions to the proposed new styles and formats? 

Between 1993–1994, when the NCLEX format moved from standardized testing to CAT testing, scores dropped from a 73% pass rate to a 63% passing rate for the NCLEX-RN. This was the lowest scores had been since at least 1983, as far back as test score data is published. 

It's not unreasonable to wonder if another change to the testing system could reduce passing rates or give pause to prospective nurses before registering for their exams. 

Study Methods and Research 

The Journal of Nursing Education published a study in 2019 concluding that the new NCSBN-CJM (clinical judgment model) is a better model for nursing clinical judgment. Although, the study was published by the Chief Operating Officer of the NCSBN, which validated their own hypothesis. 

The special research section that has been at the end of the NCLEX exam for the past few years also lends itself to scrutiny. At the end of the NCLEX, subjects may be fatigued after answering 75–145 questions that determine whether or not they can begin practicing in their field of study. However, the NCSBN did reveal that the experimental questions were taking test-takers about the same amount of time as the core questions, between 1–2 minutes. It's possible that they used the same mental energy on the research section that they did on the actual exam, but there is no method to quantify those efforts.

Financial Impacts

The market for NCLEX test prep now has the opportunity to quietly render their previous materials as outdated, and provide new books, modules, and courses for teachers and students. The NCSBN themselves made $93 million dollars in 2021 alone. Commonly, individual students may choose to hand over hundreds of their own dollars on top of their tuition to ensure nothing comes between them and their first nursing job. On top of that, colleges also pay for prep packages that offer students question banks, as well as mid-curricular and exit assessments that reflect the NCLEX testing experience. 

Instructors will also have to invest their time in evaluating their own pedagogy. Tasks as simple as re-formatting outdated slideshows or concept map rubrics could take hours. Heftier tasks, such as infusing teaching plans with the clinical judgment model, could take significantly longer. Additionally, depending on how updated a school's program is, students may need to spend their efforts making sure their study habits align with the new material they will encounter taking the NCLEX NGN.

Professional Impacts

It's difficult to argue the case for placing another barrier to entry on soon-to-be nursing students as a nationwide nursing shortage rages on. While it is likely that NCSBN crafted a test method that better assesses our nurses' skills, they are not on the front lines. They aren't watching the way nurses think firsthand. Nursing prioritization used to be between patient acuity, but now nurses have to factor in their own bathroom breaks, copious charting, and a worldwide pandemic. 

Our line of work holds space for incredibly talented, intelligent, and resilient members. But are we rewarded as professionals for the continuous rigor of our licensing exams and courses? If the NCLEX claims it will "help nurses think more critically" and "achieve better outcomes,” when will we be compensated as such? The connection between increasing nurse competency and respect for the career of nursing is hazy.

The Next Generation

"That's the way we've always done it" is a dangerous piece of rhetoric to hear in the health care world. Changing the NCLEX examination so it continues to be a developing entity is not necessarily a catalyst for a worsened nursing shortage. 

However, as we discuss the NCLEX test's implications on the next generation of nursing students, we can be more unified as we stand up for our professional rights and prepare nurses- new and experienced- for the future of health care. 

Comment down below ...

Do you think the changes to the NCLEX are fair? Why or why not?


References

1983-1994 NCLEX Pass Rates

Getting Ready for the Next-Generation NCLEX® (NGN): How to Shift from the Nursing Process to Clinical Judgment in Nursing

NCLEX Pass Rates: What You Need to Know

What Is a Computer Adaptive Test and How Does It Relate to the NCLEX?

The Evolution of the NCLEX®: 20 Years as a Computer Adaptive Exam

Next Generation NCLEX – Are You Ready?

Specializes in oncology.
On 7/21/2022 at 2:20 PM, nitenurse said:

Curriculums do not teach critical thinking,

I almost want to say "Good night, Nurse! " I do not know if you have actually taught in a formal/informal structure but critical thinking is embedded in nursing courses.

On 7/21/2022 at 2:20 PM, nitenurse said:

Just pepper real-life scenarios/cases throughout the anatomy/physiology curriculum to get the students prepared for what they will see on standardized exams

Okay, "Your patient (Chad) was born with out legs... What would you say to the grandparents who expect Chad will be mobile by the end of their first year". Agree/disagree and explain your answer. 

A college curriculum cannot dove tail all courses to the outcome required of a nursing professional. Many disciplines take A/P, Chemistry, Human Growth and Development, etc. that are supportive of their eventual degree. How do you design a  question such as the one above that meets the needs of a college student in  a pre-law, pre-med, pre-nursing, pre-theology, pre-psych, pre-physical / occupational therapy etc? 

Look ..it took us 100 years to get out of the "hospital-based "nursing program where we 'train our own'. It is imperative that nursing students be main-streamed and not tunneled into 'nursing thinking' on day one.

As I stated, pepper scenarios that would be found on standardized exams, not every situation that a nurse could possibly encounter (that's just plain silly to even attempt). So, for example, the if taking anatomy & physiology II and the section is covering the endocrine system, once the basics of hormones and associated glands/organs are covered, add a scenario that encompasses what was just covered to tie it all together as opposed to the checklist method that is so common today.

Specializes in Psych, Addictions, SOL (Student of Life).

Not everyone who takes A&P is studying to be a nurse so how does the above suugestion helo thoses folks

 

Specializes in ADN educator, PMH.

Absolutely correct. And the majority of nursing students seem to leave all their pre reps at the door when they leave that class and the nursing faculty must reteach the A&P instead of just review prior to application of information the nursing concept they are teaching. If students have a solid foundation in the science pre reps it is much easier to grasp the nursing concepts(perfusion, oxygenation, etc). Our school worked with the science department to move to application of the science, not just rote memorization of facts. The retention of info improved for students who took their sciences at our college. 
Nursing is not easy and patient safety and care will always remain the priority!

Specializes in oncology.
13 hours ago, hppygr8ful said:

Not everyone who takes A&P is studying to be a nurse so how does the above suugestion helo thoses folks

A foundational science course should not be geared to only one future discipline or use of that information. 

 

11 hours ago, Nurse233 said:

And the majority of nursing students seem to leave all their pre reps at the door when they leave that class and the nursing faculty must reteach the A&P instead of just review prior to application of information the nursing concept they are teaching.

What nursing faculty have time in the nursing curriculum to teach pre-reqs again?  Most nursing textbooks have chapters to assist the student to review the application of information from A & P (medical surg texts, pharmacology texts) and of course a student would need to actually read those chapters, . When do we stop spoon feeding a student and instead say "you have access to the resources that you need?"

I was surprised when my son in medical school said he did not have specific required textbooks. From day one, it was instilled that a professional is responsible for their own education. Through communication, collaboration, personal reflection on study skills, etc. the medical students shared what would be the best resources with each other.

Specializes in CEN, Firefighter/Paramedic.

I'll say this.

I genuinely appreciate the work you guys are putting effort into changing the exam to try to better prepare new grads for practice.

With that said, we must accept the fact that there is no medical profession where new grads are 100% ready to go out of the gate.  No test is going to take the place of quality new hire orientation.

Specializes in NICU.

I am not sure if it be a viable way of testing the NCLEX- Next Generation validity, but they could have sent emails to random people that passed at 75 questions and ask them if they would be willing to take the Next Gen. test to see how they would perform. If a high percentage of those people "pass" the Next Gen test quickly, then the validity would be pretty high based on current nursing school teaching (old NCLEX format).

My fear is that it could take time for all nursing schools and NCLEX test prep companies to accurately hone in on how to teach students to get into the mind set of taking the new NCLEX format. I think that it will take at least a year before the pass rates will return to old format levels. 

On 7/25/2022 at 5:58 PM, hppygr8ful said:

Not everyone who takes A&P is studying to be a nurse so how does the above suugestion helo thoses folks

 

A couple of thoughts:

1.The discussion here is directed specifically at the NCLEX, not overarching talking points for all healthcare disciplines, however, with that being said:

2. I state this everytime this topic comes up here; nursing should have its own specific classes just for nurses; healthcare is so hyperspecialized anyway so why not? Oddly enough, a provider told me yesterday, that he was requested to do a lumbar puncture, he said he hasn't done one since '96 and to get someone with more recent experience or a student/resident/intern. I said that to say that all of the general topics covered in A&P will not be used. Histology for example, I had more than one instructor skip those sections entirely. Every one of them said "you guys/girls will be nurses, not lab technicians looking through microscopes and preparing slides; this won't help you pass the NCLEX or help in your daily grind."  -and they were right

On 7/25/2022 at 8:19 PM, Nurse233 said:

Absolutely correct. And the majority of nursing students seem to leave all their pre reps at the door when they leave that class and the nursing faculty must reteach the A&P instead of just review prior to application of information the nursing concept they are teaching. If students have a solid foundation in the science pre reps it is much easier to grasp the nursing concepts(perfusion, oxygenation, etc). Our school worked with the science department to move to application of the science, not just rote memorization of facts. The retention of info improved for students who took their sciences at our college. 
Nursing is not easy and patient safety and care will always remain the priority!

This absolutely correct. I work at a teaching hospital and I don't believe that a single student has been able answer basic A&P questions when asked. However, its like any other experience, its use it or lose it. For example, Chemistry. Ask me the specific heat capacity of a substance at 25 degree Celsius, I couldn't tell you. I did what was necessary to slog through the class to make it to the next one. Will knowing how to determine specific heat capacity help someone pass the NCLEX with ease or push a diltiazem drip? Sciences are quantitative and formula driven. How does having a solid science foundation train one to critically think with regards to patient care? Patients are not equations that need to be solved -not by nursing anyway

On 7/26/2022 at 8:00 AM, londonflo said:

A foundational science course should not be geared to only one future discipline or use of that information. 

 

What nursing faculty have time in the nursing curriculum to teach pre-reqs again?  Most nursing textbooks have chapters to assist the student to review the application of information from A & P (medical surg texts, pharmacology texts) and of course a student would need to actually read those chapters, . When do we stop spoon feeding a student and instead say "you have access to the resources that you need?"

I was surprised when my son in medical school said he did not have specific required textbooks. From day one, it was instilled that a professional is responsible for their own education. Through communication, collaboration, personal reflection on study skills, etc. the medical students shared what would be the best resources with each other.

That's what Ben Carlson did. He never attended any lecture and just read the medical texts -he said he learned better by reading

Specializes in oncology.
11 hours ago, nitenurse said:

nursing should have its own specific classes just for nurses; healthcare is so hyperspecialized anyway so why not?

I think I will agree to disagree. When nursing becomes a post BSN discipline, such as medicine, physical, speech and occupational therapy, and then a Master's required position I agree with what you are saying. Otherwise you are taking us back to the age when an18 year old, attended a hospital sponsored school of nursing, limited to the education to what was needed by the floor nurse. No required general education requirements. My first teaching position was in a diploma school of nursing that was well respected but...well...a diploma school. (we became the second diploma school to transition with full credentials to a BSN). The old (early 1900s) classrooms had blackout curtains so the students would not see what time of day it was. (like skid bars/taverns that blacken the windows so the patrons don't know if it is morning or night). (When I taught there, the  current classrooms had been added on) Students in that type of program, went to the hospital to do morning 'duties' and had class ( specific to nursing, only specific to nursing, specific to what they would/should do as a nurse)  in the afternoon. They went back in the evening to do night duties. They learned everything about what nursing was (circa 1900) and did it well. 

 

11 hours ago, nitenurse said:

I work at a teaching hospital and I don't believe that a single student has been able answer basic A&P questions when asked.

Why are you quizzing them?

11 hours ago, nitenurse said:

That's what Ben Carlson did. He never attended any lecture and just read the medical texts -he said he learned better by reading

I did not intend this to be a reading or attending class. My son did both.

11 hours ago, nitenurse said:

.The discussion here is directed specifically at the NCLEX, not overarching talking points for all healthcare disciplines,

That isn't how it works here.

 

Specializes in oncology.
12 hours ago, nitenurse said:

I said that to say that all of the general topics covered in A&P will not be used. Histology for example, I had more than one instructor skip those sections entirely. Every one of them said "you guys/girls will be nurses, not lab technicians looking through microscopes and preparing slides; this won't help you pass the NCLEX or help in your daily grind."  -and they were right

I missed this in my first read but many times there are suppositions regarding that what we were taught, helped us achieve our goals and therefore should be the standing order of things. Your quote reads like you were in a nursing students only course. This is not a 'general' A&P course. You were funneled into this course because of a nursing major, and while the professor delivered the course in a belittling way (by limiting what was taught because 'you are just becoming nurses') , may be someone else in the class wanted to really learn A&P or had their passion ignited to something else (or got sucked in by the catalog course description thinking they were getting the full A & P). (read those stories on AN)  Anyway the course delivered what it was designed to do: you are a nurse,

12 hours ago, nitenurse said:

 this won't help you pass the NCLEX or help in your daily grind."  -

The professor was a genius who could see the future -- or was it created for you?