A Deep Dive into NCLEX Next Generation 2023

The NCSBN has decided to make changes to the NCLEX in April 2023, called NCLEX Next Generation. The possible impacts of these changes are explored, including the impact on nursing students, finances, and the nursing profession as a whole. Nursing Students NCLEX Knowledge

Updated:   Published

At a time when the necessity for nurses is at an all-time high, is it reasonable to restructure the National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX)? What are the implications of changing a national licensing test for one of the most in-demand professions? 

A Walk Down Memory Lane

Our veteran nurses once sat in desks lined up next to hundreds of other students, #2 pencil in hand, while test proctors walked up and down the aisles as they scrupulously bubbled in their answers. Test questions were identical to those of their neighbor, and there were booklets to separate the specialized nursing topics. 

Boards were only offered a few times per year, it took months to get the results, and you often had to travel out of state. Times have changed! The NCLEX is now an adaptive test that learns your weaknesses in real-time. You can get the results in less than a few days and take the test not far from your hometown. 

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCBSN) took charge of nurse licensing in 1978, and the boards were named the NCLEX (National Council Licensure Examination) in 1982. Computer adaptive testing (CAT) was officially implemented on April 1st, 1994. 

What Changes are Coming?

Prospective nurses taking the NCLEX after 2017 may remember a 'special research' section at the end. The research section took approximately 30 minutes and did not count toward the tester's score. The research conducted was intended to study and legitimize a new way to test future nurses. The new method moved away from the traditional nursing process and towards clinical judgment and decision-making. 

The NCLEX Next Generation new NCLEX format starts on April 1st, 2023, where the results of those years of research will culminate in a new NCLEX format called NCLEX NGN (Next Generation). Fortunately, this model will allow partial credit for qualifying answers. Check out the NCLEX Next Generation example items of the new types of questions that NCLEX will be offering, including extended drag-and-drops, highlighting, and grids: Next Generation NCLEX – Are You Ready?

Less fortunately, this test format will change the framework under which the NCLEX has operated. The new model of judgment and decision-making, called the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (NCJMM), may require changes in the thinking patterns of prospective nurses. 

The nursing process as it stands follows the ADPIE method: Assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation. In contrast, the NCJMM method follows a new structure of recognizing clues, prioritizing hypotheses, generating solutions, taking action, and evaluating outcomes. While both take the core concepts of noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting, the NCJMM has decided to package this differently.

Student Impact

Nursing students not only juggle clinicals, tests, and labs, but will now need to ponder whether their school curriculum has set them up for success. Will their instructors have the resources needed to pivot their test questions to the proposed new styles and formats? 

Between 1993–1994, when the NCLEX format moved from standardized testing to CAT testing, scores dropped from a 73% pass rate to a 63% passing rate for the NCLEX-RN. This was the lowest scores had been since at least 1983, as far back as test score data is published. 

It's not unreasonable to wonder if another change to the testing system could reduce passing rates or give pause to prospective nurses before registering for their exams. 

Study Methods and Research 

The Journal of Nursing Education published a study in 2019 concluding that the new NCSBN-CJM (clinical judgment model) is a better model for nursing clinical judgment. Although, the study was published by the Chief Operating Officer of the NCSBN, which validated their own hypothesis. 

The special research section that has been at the end of the NCLEX exam for the past few years also lends itself to scrutiny. At the end of the NCLEX, subjects may be fatigued after answering 75–145 questions that determine whether or not they can begin practicing in their field of study. However, the NCSBN did reveal that the experimental questions were taking test-takers about the same amount of time as the core questions, between 1–2 minutes. It's possible that they used the same mental energy on the research section that they did on the actual exam, but there is no method to quantify those efforts.

Financial Impacts

The market for NCLEX test prep now has the opportunity to quietly render their previous materials as outdated, and provide new books, modules, and courses for teachers and students. The NCSBN themselves made $93 million dollars in 2021 alone. Commonly, individual students may choose to hand over hundreds of their own dollars on top of their tuition to ensure nothing comes between them and their first nursing job. On top of that, colleges also pay for prep packages that offer students question banks, as well as mid-curricular and exit assessments that reflect the NCLEX testing experience. 

Instructors will also have to invest their time in evaluating their own pedagogy. Tasks as simple as re-formatting outdated slideshows or concept map rubrics could take hours. Heftier tasks, such as infusing teaching plans with the clinical judgment model, could take significantly longer. Additionally, depending on how updated a school's program is, students may need to spend their efforts making sure their study habits align with the new material they will encounter taking the NCLEX NGN.

Professional Impacts

It's difficult to argue the case for placing another barrier to entry on soon-to-be nursing students as a nationwide nursing shortage rages on. While it is likely that NCSBN crafted a test method that better assesses our nurses' skills, they are not on the front lines. They aren't watching the way nurses think firsthand. Nursing prioritization used to be between patient acuity, but now nurses have to factor in their own bathroom breaks, copious charting, and a worldwide pandemic. 

Our line of work holds space for incredibly talented, intelligent, and resilient members. But are we rewarded as professionals for the continuous rigor of our licensing exams and courses? If the NCLEX claims it will "help nurses think more critically" and "achieve better outcomes,” when will we be compensated as such? The connection between increasing nurse competency and respect for the career of nursing is hazy.

The Next Generation

"That's the way we've always done it" is a dangerous piece of rhetoric to hear in the health care world. Changing the NCLEX examination so it continues to be a developing entity is not necessarily a catalyst for a worsened nursing shortage. 

However, as we discuss the NCLEX test's implications on the next generation of nursing students, we can be more unified as we stand up for our professional rights and prepare nurses- new and experienced- for the future of health care. 

Comment down below ...

Do you think the changes to the NCLEX are fair? Why or why not?


References

1983-1994 NCLEX Pass Rates

Getting Ready for the Next-Generation NCLEX® (NGN): How to Shift from the Nursing Process to Clinical Judgment in Nursing

NCLEX Pass Rates: What You Need to Know

What Is a Computer Adaptive Test and How Does It Relate to the NCLEX?

The Evolution of the NCLEX®: 20 Years as a Computer Adaptive Exam

Next Generation NCLEX – Are You Ready?

On 7/31/2022 at 7:56 AM, londonflo said:

I missed this in my first read but many times there are suppositions regarding that what we were taught, helped us achieve our goals and therefore should be the standing order of things. Your quote reads like you were in a nursing students only course. This is not a 'general' A&P course. You were funneled into this course because of a nursing major, and while the professor delivered the course in a belittling way (by limiting what was taught because 'you are just becoming nurses') , may be someone else in the class wanted to really learn A&P or had their passion ignited to something else (or got sucked in by the catalog course description thinking they were getting the full A & P). (read those stories on AN)  Anyway the course delivered what it was designed to do: you are a nurse,

The professor was a genius who could see the future -- or was it created for you?

Yes, they were 'general' A&P classes; in A&P I, we had two ultrasound students, one MRI, one CT and three HIM students (out of 54 students total). In A&P II, two respiratory, one medical biller, one nuc med and two dental hygienists. Hence, the reason the instructor skipped the histology section I believe. So, if I interpret your statement correctly, we had several non-nurse students and they were just as miserable as the rest of us. Everyone had the same goal, get through the class. Passion ignition is something you see on Netflix movies, in reality no one maintains that energy level for 2+ years. And again, none of the skipped sections were on the NCLEX so the instructors were indeed geniuses by your definition. .. . .. 

On 7/31/2022 at 7:20 AM, londonflo said:

I think I will agree to disagree. When nursing becomes a post BSN discipline, such as medicine, physical, speech and occupational therapy, and then a Master's required position I agree with what you are saying. Otherwise you are taking us back to the age when an18 year old, attended a hospital sponsored school of nursing, limited to the education to what was needed by the floor nurse. No required general education requirements. My first teaching position was in a diploma school of nursing that was well respected but...well...a diploma school. (we became the second diploma school to transition with full credentials to a BSN). The old (early 1900s) classrooms had blackout curtains so the students would not see what time of day it was. (like skid bars/taverns that blacken the windows so the patrons don't know if it is morning or night). (When I taught there, the  current classrooms had been added on) Students in that type of program, went to the hospital to do morning 'duties' and had class ( specific to nursing, only specific to nursing, specific to what they would/should do as a nurse)  in the afternoon. They went back in the evening to do night duties. They learned everything about what nursing was (circa 1900) and did it well. 

-I think this is a bit extreme and I'm not sure how you believe it could go in this direction

Why are you quizzing them?

-I am not; I am not a preceptor; If I quizzed them, I would have said so

I did not intend this to be a reading or attending class. My son did both.

That isn't how it works here.

-If that's not how it works here, then why bother having a discussion topic in the first place?  Let's talk about V8 engines then if no one has any intention of staying on the topic presented?

 

 

Specializes in oncology.
11 hours ago, nitenurse said:

Passion ignition is something you see on Netflix movies, in reality no one maintains that energy level for 2+ years.

Generalizing on every one's interest in a subject, course or educational program to:

12 hours ago, nitenurse said:

Everyone had the same goal, get through the class.

is not my perception and motivation for education and knowledge. I guess I am an anomaly....still taking classes at 67 years old. I have enough credits for a bachelor's 2 times over, an MSN plus 45 more post MSN credits (science, psychology, history (English, US, local, fashion, art, architecture etc) sociology, web design, computer skills and more. And I meet many of 'my kind' in my classes. 

Specializes in oncology.
12 hours ago, nitenurse said:

Let's talk about V8 engines then

And yes, another poster can talk about V8 engines too. It is not the design of message board posts to be limited to the scope of only what the OP says is their opinion or topic. The OP's topic was NCLEX. You added your thoughts on limiting A & P courses to what the NCLEX candidate needs to know, along with citing your opinion on educational and work experiences, the state of nursing education today, a lumbar puncture etc. . I expanded on the role of general education in a program of study leading to a professional practice field which includes but is not limited to the NCLEX licensing exam. I too talked about my educational experiences giving my opinion and a history of nursing education. 

Neither one of us can speak for everyone in their interests in education. 

Specializes in Nurse Educator.

As a nurse educator, I think there is benefit in these changes. We often see students who can memorize the “traditional”  NCLEX style question but lack critical thinking and prioritization skills. Having questions that are more case based allows better assessment of a students ability to critically think, prioritize, and general knowledge of the subject. Yes, it will mean that educators will need to update their material. In my opinion, educators should be spending time on this after every semester. We should be continuously evaluating the effectiveness of our material used and making sure it is up-to-date. The program that I teach in changed the exam formats for one of our units for a class I teach last year in preparation for the NextGen changes. Instead of the traditional multiple choice or select all that apply style questions, our new exam is a case study. There are still multiple choice and select all that apply questions, but there are also short answer questions that allow us to better assess if our students can truly critically think and prioritize as well as having a true understanding of the labs and diagnostics they should be familiar with for the disease process. I’m really interested to see what the result will be for pass rates once the NextGen changes take place!

Specializes in oncology.
1 hour ago, Rmooney said:

. Instead of the traditional multiple choice or select all that apply style questions, our new exam is a case study. There are still multiple choice and select all that apply questions, but there are also short answer questions that allow us to better assess if our students can truly critically think and prioritize as well as having a true understanding of the labs and diagnostics they should be familiar with for the disease process.

I am so glad to read this. Having taught from the 1980s to the 2018s, I have been through many exam revolutions. In the late 80s, we did case studies. I thought they gave the student the best way to plan, 'deliver' and evaluate care. Then we had to go to the NCLEX test plan that each test question stood alone and could not build on a previous test question. 

Specializes in oncology.
On 7/30/2022 at 9:44 PM, nitenurse said:

I work at a teaching hospital and I don't believe that a single student has been able answer basic A&P questions when asked.

No quizzing (per your testimony)  but a conclusion on your beliefs 

On 8/3/2022 at 8:07 AM, londonflo said:

No quizzing (per your testimony)  but a conclusion on your beliefs 

Not a conclusion on my beliefs and I'm not sure as to how you arrived at that outcome

On 8/3/2022 at 5:25 AM, londonflo said:

Generalizing on every one's interest in a subject, course or educational program to:

is not my perception and motivation for education and knowledge. I guess I am an anomaly....still taking classes at 67 years old. I have enough credits for a bachelor's 2 times over, an MSN plus 45 more post MSN credits (science, psychology, history (English, US, local, fashion, art, architecture etc) sociology, web design, computer skills and more. And I meet many of 'my kind' in my classes. 

I am not generalizing, I am speaking from my experience. That was why everyone put study groups together. Academically speaking, I have two bachelor degrees (one in HR and a BSN), two master degrees and working on a third (MBA, MSN, working on a MPH) along with a Ph.D in IT. Usually I am the oldest one in the class and that includes the instructor. I had a long career in other disciplines before moving to healthcare so I have a unique perspective with curriculums and standardized testing. At every school I have taught, I have always advocated that curriculums should include standardized testing -especially with IT certifications (I.e. incorporate A+ principles into intro the computer classes) and it always falls on deaf ears unfortunately. So, with this topic in this forum, my stance remains the same, incorporate NCLEX formatting into curriculums. .. . 

Specializes in oncology.
13 hours ago, nitenurse said:

So, with this topic in this forum, my stance remains the same, incorporate NCLEX formatting into curriculums. .. . 

Who is disagreeing with this?

13 hours ago, nitenurse said:

I have a unique perspective with curriculums and standardized testing.

All of us instrumental in any educational program do need to value the development of a curriculum and the use of many forms of evaluation; to make sure the curriculum is delivering what it is designed for. The easiest, most generalizable way, providing the most data points to compare one candidate to another is standardized testing. In nursing we use NCLEX with a full examination of a group's results through Mountain Measurement analysis (expensive but entirely worth it for improvement of a curriculum). I am sure you are aware of it. The use of portfolios and other individual work by the student gives us qualitative data, that too is so important for curriculum development and evaluation.

 

Quote

I work at a teaching hospital and I don't believe that a single student has been able answer basic A&P questions when asked.

13 hours ago, nitenurse said:

Not a conclusion on my beliefs

When some one uses the word 'beliefs' well...I figure they are referencing their beliefs. 

On 8/5/2022 at 9:15 AM, londonflo said:

Who is disagreeing with this?

I do not know if anyone disagreed with that statement if I understand the context of your question.

All of us instrumental in any educational program do need to value the development of a curriculum and the use of many forms of evaluation; to make sure the curriculum is delivering what it is designed for. The easiest, most generalizable way, providing the most data points to compare one candidate to another is standardized testing. In nursing we use NCLEX with a full examination of a group's results through Mountain Measurement analysis (expensive but entirely worth it for improvement of a curriculum). I am sure you are aware of it. The use of portfolios and other individual work by the student gives us qualitative data, that too is so important for curriculum development and evaluation.

Perhaps. However,  I believe that standardized testing has outlived its usefulness and purpose if there ever was one.  All of the expensive measurement tools along with the equally complex statistical analysis tools has served to over complicate a simple process. 

 

When some one uses the word 'beliefs' well...I figure they are referencing their beliefs. 

well. .. since I did not use the word 'beliefs' in my initial post, so I am not sure as to what you may be referencing in this instance.

Specializes in oncology.
On 8/4/2022 at 9:15 PM, nitenurse said:

Not a conclusion on my beliefs and I'm not sure as to how you arrived at that outcome

 

15 minutes ago, nitenurse said:

well. .. since I did not use the word 'beliefs' in my initial post, so I am not sure as to what you may be referencing in this instance.

I am referencing your quote of 8/4.. as shown above. I don't care if it was in your initial post and are you are trying to back track now. . The fact is you used it.