Tying Patient Satisfaction to Medicare Reimbursement is Problematic

Patient satisfaction surveys are important in helping the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve. Since patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data instead of objective metrics, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates. Nurses Safety Article

Patient satisfaction surveys have been receiving an amplified amount of attention at hospitals and other types of healthcare facilities, especially since the results of these reviews now have a significant effect on Medicare reimbursement.

Valuable information can be gleaned from the comments and feedback that patients provide when they fill out and return the surveys to the facilities where they previously received care. In addition, patient feedback is a remarkably important tool that helps the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve.

Still, patient satisfaction surveys are not exactly free from problems. In fact, patient satisfaction surveys are problematic for several reasons.

First of all, the results of these patient satisfaction surveys are entirely subjective and do not always reflect the quality of the care that clinicians are delivering. For instance, many of the most poorly rated facilities have some of the best patient outcomes, including lower than average death rates, low readmission rates, and a minimal number of hospital-acquired infections. Good facilities and skilled healthcare workers are two of the main ingredients that make favorable patient outcomes possible, but a handful of nitpicky patients can destroy one hospital's overall patient satisfaction rating by returning surveys where they've responded to every single question with 'one.' A survey score of 'one' translates to 'very poor' care, even though the patient who returned these dismal responses actually might have had an excellent outcome that was free of complications.

On the other hand, many of the most favorably rated facilities have some of the worst patient outcomes, including higher than average patient death rates. A USA TODAY analysis of more than 4,600 U.S. hospitals has found that 120 of those most highly rated by patients have higher than average death rates for heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia (USA TODAY, 2011). However, a patient's perception is his reality, so he will return a survey with appreciative responses to every single question if the care was perceived as being good, even if the inpatient stay is taking place at a hospital with a high percentage of poor outcomes.

Secondly, the corporations that formulate patient satisfaction surveys are exploiting hospital administrators' hopes of using the ratings to market their facilities. One national chain of cancer treatment hospitals regularly uses expensive airtime to broadcast television commercials. The narrator of their TV commercials never fails to mention that "our facilities have an overall 95 percent patient satisfaction rating!" Countless hospitals across the US have resorted to providing customer service measures that sometimes detract from effective patient care as an attempt to alter perceptions and raise patient satisfaction survey scores. Many overworked nurses are spending increasing amounts of time on activities such as the recital of phony scripted phrases and the constant fetching of snacks, sodas, chairs and cots to keep clients happy.

Finally, patient satisfaction surveys can unfairly generate positive ratings for mediocre doctors and bring about poor ratings for highly competent physicians. The physician who coddles the most demanding patients, submits to their unrealistic requests, gives them everything they desire and never says "no" will receive high ratings. In contrast, the doctor who sets realistic limits with patients and says "no" to improper medical care or unnecessary prescriptions will be rated unfavorably. A growing number of patients will be unhappy if they do not get what they want out of their clinicians, even if they do not need the things they are requesting.

Patient satisfaction surveys have their place in the realm of healthcare because the opinions of the people to whom we provide care are essential. However, the surveys are based on subjective perceptions instead of objective metrics such as infection rates and patient outcomes. In view of the fact that patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates.

RESOURCES

USA TODAY Publishes Analysis of Death Rates at More Than 4,600 U.S. Hospitals. (August 2011). usatoday.com. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from About USA TODAY

Specializes in ER, progressive care.
I have a question about this...If you receive a questionnaire and don't submit it, does that affect anything? Is 'No comment' seen as 'bad comment'?

I think it only counts if a patient submits a survey.

And I agree, KnitWitch. Forget my professional nursing judgement. Give the somnolent patient their dilaudid, klonopin and benadryl all at the same time because "it's good for satisfaction scores." Let the patient go downstairs and smoke even though we're a non-smoking facility. You're on a 1500cc fluid restriction but it's okay to have all those soda cans and juices at your bedside because it makes you happy. You're diabetic? Go ahead and eat all of those sugar-laden snacks at your bedside, it won't mess with your blood sugar!

An unsubmitted form can't be counted as anything else, I would presume. It is just logged as not received, but not counted as negative.

I concur with that article. The survey should be for internal use only, by someone qualified to know the trivial from the important, and should NOT be an employee or hospital evaluation tool. The lunacy of having pay and performance ratings based on evaluations by probably the very people LEAST-qualified to rate it is one of the key things that infuriated me and really soured me on finishing nursing school. It's outrageous that those probably the least qualified to evaluate my competence as a nurse have so much power to affect my career. It truly baffled me why nursing as a profession is treated the way it is. Your work is essential to good patient outcomes, and a hospital really can't run effectively without nurses. Yet, nurses are treated almost like servants, by everyone. It's nuts. I don't want that job anymore. I was already burned out on the bull_t and waitressing after just one year of diploma school. At least diploma school threw us right out there in the nitty-gritty so that the savvy adults who already have the skills to evaluate an employer and a workplace could see what the big picture really is.

Specializes in Medical Surgical/Addiction/Mental Health.

I too think it is a ploy to decrease reimbursement. I am interested in knowing how this will affect staffing ratios. If administrators see a correlation between staffing ratios and patient satisfaction, then maybe adequate staffing will become priority. Let’s see…losing money because of poor patient satisfaction or decreasing the bottom line to add staff to make patients happy. Hmmmm. Let’s be honest, hospitals are becoming Hilton Resorts. While I think it is nice to have a comfortable ambience, it sets expectations higher than what I feel can be delivered unless staffing changes are made.

What do you suppose will happen to the smaller hospitals that do not have the capital to renovate or pay fair salaries?

Specializes in Case mgmt., rehab, (CRRN), LTC & psych.
What do you suppose will happen to the smaller hospitals that do not have the capital to renovate or pay fair salaries?
I think a handful of the small hospitals that lack deep pockets/capital will fold up, go under, and close their doors for good as the result of continual monetary losses.

I think the ship has sailed for me. Now, I am over the shock and dismay and would just like to move on. Does anyone have high scores? Any suggestions on how to answer call lights as soon as the patients would like?

Any suggestions on how to keep a 24 hour facility quiet at night?

Any suggestions on how to keep a 24 hour facility with frequent traffic in and out clean?

Any suggestions on how to teach side effects to people who don't care about them?

I would do anything to have others think my co workers and I do a good job. I know we do.

Specializes in Acute Care, CM, School Nursing.

I began my very first job as a 16 year old high school student. Worked continuously through high school and nursing school. I worked as a RN for approx 5 years, most of that in hospitals. I was home with my kids for years, then went back to the hospital per diem for another year and a half. In all of my years working, from back when I was 16, I never, ever received a "write up". Never had a bad evaluation at work. I consider myself to be a very hard worker.

What made me finally leave my per diem job (and acute care) for good? Last year, I received my first ever write up. The reason: A patient's family told my nurse manager that they felt I "wasn't in the room enough". I got a phone call from my manager, telling me about the family's complaints. Apparently, they were also angry that I wouldn't give the patient a tylenol. 1) He had no orders for tylenol, and I had documented that I tried repeatedly to contact the doctor. 2) The patient was extremely ill and in liver failure!! My nurse manager actually told me that it wouldn't have been a big deal to "slip him a tylenol" to keep them happy. I could not believe what I was hearing! Customer satisfaction at its finest!

I remembered this shift, patient and family clearly. The patient was a DNR, and had many, many issues. The family was furious at the hospital and the doctors over his care. They were not happy campers in general. I knew I was in for it, because I was the only one that was actually right there, in front of their faces. Sure enough, I was right: My first ever write up at work.

PS: That shift was a nightmare: It was a weekend and I was working with one other nurse on a "satellite" step-down unit. No supplies, no CNA. Lots of very, very sick patients. I let the on-call nursing supervisor know that the situation was completely unmanageable (repeatedly). Unfortunately, I never filled out the form, protesting the unsafe assignment. I really should have, and I still kick myself. But, like a fool, I didn't want to waste time finding it and filling it out. There was just too much to do... *sigh* I still miss bedside nursing, but I will never go back. It's not worth my sanity.

Specializes in labor & delivery.

I've been a nurse 3 years this month. Getting away from the bedside soon as I can. We have been sent to "charm school" type classes to learn how to communicate and impress our patients with everything but good nursing care, all for the sake of reimbursement. My skills and knowledge make no difference at my job as long as I make the patient feel as if she has been residing at the Ritz with me as her concierge. Not what I went to school for at all.

I do believe that the posters who have said they think it's to cut reimbursement rates are right. Obviously people aren't happy when they're in the hospital. Reimbursement should be paid on medical outcomes, not "my TV wouldn't get the sports channel and I waited ten minutes for a soda"

I have been saying the same thing for a few years now. I too have witnessed numerous times where the nurse who provides the most competent care but does not coddle the patient gets the most complaints. I have seen patient's and their families praise nurses and doctors who give inferior care just because they smile and give repeated scripted responses. Eventually insurance companies will implement this protocol so they too may cut payments. This in turn is going to drive up healthcare cost.

Specializes in PCCN.
I too think it is a ploy to decrease reimbursement. I am interested in knowing how this will affect staffing ratios. If administrators see a correlation between staffing ratios and patient satisfaction, then maybe adequate staffing will become priority. Let's see...losing money because of poor patient satisfaction or decreasing the bottom line to add staff to make patients happy. Hmmmm. Let's be honest, hospitals are becoming Hilton Resorts. While I think it is nice to have a comfortable ambience, it sets expectations higher than what I feel can be delivered unless staffing changes are made.

What do you suppose will happen to the smaller hospitals that do not have the capital to renovate or pay fair salaries?

They won't change the staffing- they will just can the "low performers" and get new ones, since nurses are a dime a dozen....:banghead:

Specializes in PCCN.
I think a handful of the small hospitals that lack deep pockets/capital will fold up, go under, and close their doors for good as the result of continual monetary losses.

This just happened recently where I live.:(

Specializes in Emergency/Cath Lab.

I see this more as a "Oh we know people hate the ER times, hate being sick and are demanding as hell" so therefore how can we save some money...Thats right lets ask them stupid questions and then say you have to score the best on all of them to get paid for it.

I wish I could pay less when my food takes too long to get to me

Or the waitress is rude

Or when the lines are long to get checked out at the grocery store

or fill in the blank here.