Published
Is it a HIPAA violation to endorse narcotic medications by reading it aloud and completely (name of patient, medication & dose, and number of pills) even when patients are around? This is in a LTC setting. Is there a specific policy/law with regards to this?
I think (?) the point was that you still need to say to the resident "this is oxycodone for your hip pain." The resident does have a right to know what you are giving them.
I'll say it again...I never said that they didn't have a right to know what you are giving them. However. after you explain it to them the first time what the oxycodone is for, if you are practicing the 5 rights, it shouldn't be necessary to go over the same medication over and over again. If it's their only medication for pain, you can say, "Ok Mr. Smith, I have brought you your pain pill." It doesn't need to be announced for everyone to hear at EVERY administration.
I'll say it again...I never said that they didn't have a right to know what you are giving them. However. after you explain it to them the first time what the oxycodone is for, if you are practicing the 5 rights, it shouldn't be necessary to go over the same medication over and over again. If it's their only medication for pain, you can say, "Ok Mr. Smith, I have brought you your pain pill." It doesn't need to be announced for everyone to hear at EVERY administration.
Agreed.
I will try to explain their different pain pills but it is my job to assess pain and pick the appropriate pill.
I have never seen two nurses verify any oral narcotic in my career. They may come in and tell the patient what they are bringing, but reviewing it step by step? Never once seen it done.I wasn't suggesting keeping it a secret, but at the same time, if you are using your 5 rights, it shouldn't matter if the patient is awake or in a coma. In a LTC facility, it would be different if it was the first time a patient was receiving the medication, but doing the whole review over and over again? Other than your normal checks, I don't see that it is necessary at all.
I was thinking more along the lines of giving a new med or doing discharge teaching. I agree with you that it isn't necessary to go through the whole shebang each time. Sorry that wasn't expressed better.
Imay not go through the whole shabang every time but I do say "Here is your percocet for your hip pain that you asked for" for the patient when asked..."have you gotten something for pain" they will answer "I think so the nurse gave me a pill"...surveyor...."what was the pill's name" ....patient ..."i don't know she didn't tell me" so Yes I say....... I have you pecrocet/dilaudid/morphine that you requested for pain....every time.I'll say it again...I never said that they didn't have a right to know what you are giving them. However. after you explain it to them the first time what the oxycodone is for, if you are practicing the 5 rights, it shouldn't be necessary to go over the same medication over and over again. If it's their only medication for pain, you can say, "Ok Mr. Smith, I have brought you your pain pill." It doesn't need to be announced for everyone to hear at EVERY administration.
"
Imay not go through the whole shabang every time but I do say "Here is your percocet for your hip pain that you asked for" for the patient when asked..."have you gotten something for pain" they will answer "I think so the nurse gave me a pill"...surveyor...."what was the pill's name" ....patient ..."i don't know she didn't tell me" so Yes I say....... I have you pecrocet/dilaudid/morphine that you requested for pain....every time."
OT but I love that dog in your avatar!
psu_213, BSN, RN
3,878 Posts
I think (?) the point was that you still need to say to the resident "this is oxycodone for your hip pain." The resident does have a right to know what you are giving them.