When removing an IV
- 0Jun 2, '07 by srg4784I've watched one nurse remove an IV then I was asked to do one today (we don't do IV therapy until 5th semester @ school)....so after I got all the tape off and withdrew it all that came out was a catheter and rly no bleeding at all. When I observed the nurse remove one there was a lot of bleeding and a needle was removed. I asked the nurse should or shouldn't there be a needle with this IV...it was hep-lock by the way...and she wasn't sure so all day I've been worried if I somehow left a needle in the client. I didn't feel anything hard around the site like what I'd expect a needle to be and when I asked someone else they just looked at me like I was dumb so after two looks like that I just felt really stupid. The PCS was super busy since there was only two nurses on the floor today so I never even found time to ask them and when I observed the site later on still no bleeding on the gause and no swelling or redness so I figured it was okay. I did tell the oncoming tech about this and left a sticky note for the PCS on her door to check it ASAP. Is this normal, should there or shouldn't there have been a needle removed?Last edit by srg4784 on Jun 2, '07
- 24,883 Visits
- 0Jun 2, '07 by nurseangel47It's okay, srg. That would have been the catheter portion contained within the actual needle device itself. When inserted into the vein, the needle is withdrawn, the catheter stays inside. Pretty nifty, huh? LOL Don't feel worried over this anymore. You did fine. Some folks bleed not a drop, others like a rivulet! Depends on their individual bleed times, meds they're on, etc.
- 0Jun 2, '07 by ukstudentMost IV's no longer have a needle left in a pt. So more than likely there was no needle for you to take out. It is also normal for a hep-lock site not to bleed or to bleed very minimally. If you have a clinical instructor with you, you should ask him/her any questions you have. I am sorry that no one took the time to teach you then and there, and left you wondering and worried.
- 0Jun 2, '07 by srg4784WHEW lol, thank you both. I've been calling back to work and still can't get up with the PCS to see if she checked the site. Lol
Quote from ukstudentWe don't do anything with IVs except monitor the sites in clinicals until 5th semester ....this happened on the job, I'm an extern!Most IV's no longer have a needle left in a pt. So more than likely there was no needle for you to take out. It is also normal for a hep-lock site not to bleed or to bleed very minimally. If you have a clinical instructor with you, you should ask him/her any questions you have. I am sorry that no one took the time to teach you then and there, and left you wondering and worried.
- 0Jun 2, '07 by JaneyWIt is also always good to document that the tip of the catheter was intact when removing the IV. This requires checking the site and makes it clear in documentation. I have never seen a modern IV with an actual needle--just a catheter. As another poster pointed out, the catheter stays and the needle is removed right after insertion. However, I only really work with quick-caths. I'm sure there are many others out there! I'm sorry no one took the one minute to explain that to you on the floor. I hope your overall experience has been better!
- 2Jun 2, '07 by Daytonitesrg4784. . .I was an IV therapist for many years. I don't want you to worry about this. You did nothing wrong. There is nothing wrong with the patient. There are two possible reasons that a patient does not bleed when an IV catheter is removed:
- The tissues around the IV cannula were already in a state of inflammation and swelling and the cannula was probably keeping the walls of the vein expanded. The minute the cannula was removed, the local swelling caused the walls of that vein to collapse flat which effectively cut off any potential swelling. It will heal. If you want to know the pathophysiology of this, look at the inflammation response of the body and how the body reacts when there is an introduction of a foreign body into it. Every person's body reacts to the presence of foreign bodies and substances. This is one of the reasons why the INS (Intravenous Nurses Society) standard is that every IV site should ideally be changed every 24 hours. By 72 hours, the policy that most hospitals say each IV site should be changed by, evidence of phlebitis (the inflammation response) should be present to some degree. Redness isn't the only sign or symptom of a phlebitis. The swelling doesn't necessarily have to be massive either. If you start having patients hold both arms together and really looking at and comparing the arm with the IV and the one without the IV, you will start to see the very subtle changes in an arm with an IV that is 72 hours old.
- Within 24 hours of any foreign body residing in tissue, particularly the veins, the body forms a biological sheath of slime around it. This is a protective barrier and one of the body's homeostatic mechanisms as it attempts to wall it off from the body. As the IV cannula is being pulled out, the skin edges of the puncture wound (remember the skin is elastic) act like a squeegee and milk that biological sheath off. What you can't see on the other side of that puncture wound that the IV just came out of may very well be a little clump of this stuff just large enough to form a nice obstruction preventing any blood from leaking to the outside. The longer an IV cannula is in a vein the more developed this biological sheath is. These sheaths cause all kinds of problems in central lines because as they form they sometimes form flaps that interfere with the flow of IV fluids through the distal holes of the catheters. More commonly, when nurses try to aspirate blood from a central line, these little suckers get pulled over and into the catheter opening very effectively obstructing them so no blood can be aspirated from the line.
Now that you know the answer to your question. Go out and inform the world and I don't want to hear anything about you losing any sleep over this tonight. The patient is going to be just fine.
Oh, by the way, that person who looked at you like you were dumb when you were asking your questions did that because they didn't know the answers. The look on their face was covering up their own ignorance.