Re: What ONE thing is most important in a new health care system?
"Access to health care"
Affordable and guaranteed "non employer related" access to health care for everyone... This is not to imply the word "socialism" per se, but rather I prefer to call it a public safety net similar to the Social Security program etc.
Additionally, there seems to be a lot of scare mongering going on about the quality of delivered care involved with implementing a new health care system. ...On the contrary, I actually feel this will become the opposite in actual reality.
..Why you ask?
Firstly, according to some studies conducted in 2009, there are now approx.
87 million Americans without health insurance today! ...87 Million!
(Source:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/03/04...pidemic.obama/)
This is primarily because many people can no longer afford the current (employer related) health care insurance system we have in place.
Secondly, let's rewind back to the original quality of care statement for a moment...
"Access to health care" in my opinion, is one specific measure involving the quality of care people are getting today. So far, 87 million Americans under the current system we already have in place today are getting a big "0" in quality care because you have to actually get health care, before you can get ANY quality (good or bad ) health care...
Again, the "quality of care" isn't the issue and the facts don't lie and speak for themselves.
Ask yourself..
If 87 million people are no longer paying for health care.. then who is footing the bill?
In conclusion, Is it any real mystery why "access to health care" has become beyond the reach of an average person and is now only available to the privileged remainder? The current failing health care insurance system is somehow supposed to equate to mean offering better "quality" health care for all

according to some "concerned sources?"
Nursing News