Critical Thinking Snapshot for Nurses&Students - page 3
Patient: Mr. Jones Mr. Jones, a 38-year-old white male with no known previous chronic illness, was admitted six hours ago after being involved in a single motor vehicle accident. He was the unbelted... Read More
0May 21, '03 by nursebuckyI would go see Ms. Smith first because of her known history and the chest pains.
0May 21, '03 by betts"We could do it so that there is no shame or blame in getting the answer "wrong" and indeed in some questions the "right" answer might be one of several "rights"." quoted by gwenith
Ask yourself this; "Would I rather be here, in this forum, or on the floor where I'm employed if I'm mistaken?" Again, I would rather hear/learn from my colleague's than a medical review board/attorney.Last edit by betts on May 21, '03
0May 21, '03 by SmilingBluEyesWELLLLLLLLL I am new to the thread but believe me or not (just an OB Nurse here) I thought immediately Mr. Jones was the primary concern based on the old basic ABC's. Of course, it sounds easy for me to say AFTER you have already said who/what to Tx first, but that is honestly my first impression.
0May 22, '03 by HoJopatient: mr. jones
mr. jones, a 38-year-old white male with no known previous chronic illness, was admitted six hours ago after being involved in a single motor vehicle accident. he was the unbelted driver of a vehicle that skidded off the road and hit a tree at approximately 45mph. he reported losing consciousness at the scene. mr. jones was admitted in stable condition with a diagnosis of myocardial contusion and fractured ribs (4,5, & 6) on the left thorax.patient: mrs. smith
mrs. smith, a 64-year-old female with known coronary artery disease, was admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery. her risk factors for arteriosclerosis include a strong family history, smoking, and hypertension. she has been admitted to the ccu several times with angina. cardiac catheterization demonstrated a high grade (>90%) stenosis of the left anterior descending (lad) artery. surgery was performed 3 days ago with a left internal mammary artery (lima) graft.
mrs. smith stayed in the cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit (cvsicu) for two days. on the second day, her swan-ganz catheter was removed, iv medications tapered off, and her foley catheter removed. on this, the third day, mrs. smith was transferred to the step-down unit with a heparin lock iv in place.
beyond that i'd delegate to other staff to check on mrs. smith and her cp, possibly get here a nitro tab see if that helps and slap some 02 on her. mr. smith on the other hand has a much shorter timespan, if it was a tension pneumo he'd need a ct fast. if i had checked on mrs. smith 1st, mr. smith could have expired in that time, and it would be too late to save him. hence litigation.
0May 28, '03 by babs_rnOriginally posted by maxthecat
And the point of all this was????
Most of the nurses who post here seem to me to be professionals who are perfectly capable of using critical thinking in their daily dealings with patients/families. They are not children who need remedial case studies. Personally, I found the tone of this exercise condescending, and my guess as to why you received so few responses is that many other nurses felt the same way and didn't waste their time replying.
But I still say if you can talk, you can breathe.
And I STILL say that leaving the whole thing unanswered in a freakin' bulletin board doesn't say anything at ALL about those who chose to read and not respond. We all have that right.Last edit by babs_rn on May 28, '03
0May 28, '03 by dawnglovesOriginally posted by sandgroper
And the number of staff for this unit is very dangerous to start with. If you allowed yourself to be in this position, only one person will be responsible for any adverse outcome.