Published
in my hospital, the majority of people that insert catheters are the nurses. so to answer your question, no it would not bother me for the nurses to receive the training. dont underestimate the knowledge of a student either. it is possible for them to teach a few things. you gotta remember, for a lot of students, they learned these skills recently. the "proper" way of doing them is pounded into their brain. whereas, an experienced nurse may have been inserting catheters for years, but were taught the correct way 20 yrs ago. now, im not saying this is a bad thing. but sometimes when you're in a rush, things like your sterile technique arent alway as sterile as it should be.
at any rate, its my opinion that a refresher course in a practical skill is never a bad thing. its those useless inservices that suck (you know...the ones that reiterate how the customer is always right, we're here to cater to their every whim, etc)
It would bother me because I'm a conscientious worker who washes his hands and knows how to insert a foley. I understand your feelings that with 30 years experience having to learn such a basic task from someone less experienced is a bit troublesome.
However, if in the end patients benefit, it's o.k. Even if an student nurses is the one teaching me, I have much to learn, so I would take it in stride. No harm done in taking a few minutes to check off a skill.
The only thing that would bother me about it is that where i work, sometimes the docs will put in the foley before a case, and i would have a problem with the hospital making me take this inservice over again, and not the docs. Refreshers are not a bad idea, but make them for everyone that does them, if it's about infection control.
I watched VERY poor unsterile techinque from an experienced Cardiac Critical Care nurse on a foley insert, I was a first year, first semester student and I could have done way better. This was on a person who had coded and was on a vent, I am sure that he did NOT need the added stress of a very possible UTI from her sloppiness, so I say yes, what would a little refresher hurt anyone- its all good if it is for the pt benefit
This mandate has "RISK MANAGEMENT" written all over it!
Hospital administration is fearful that a high incidence of UTIs is going to be detrimental to the bottom line, either by way of lawsuits, un-reimbursed care, accreditation problems, negative public information pertaining to nosocomial infection rates, etc.
This is their way of addressing the issue to look good to potential plaintiffs, insurance companies, JCAHO, the public, etc. As many posters have pointed out, it is likely to be of limited effectiveness unless ALL personnel who insert and care for Foleys are inserviced, and proper standards of care are maintained.
Expect this type of action to be repeated with other problems as well, such as IV infiltrates, falls, etc.
I don't see anything wrong with this. Think of it as an annual update or a refresher course. I always thought I was proficient in inserting foley cathethers...then I got two females back to back that I just couldn't find any easy way to insert the cathether. The second patient was so contracted, I wasn't even about to move her legs to get in there. I think that if a urologist gave an inservice on the proper ways of inserting foley cathethers and special tricks of the trade, then the incidences of UTIs and trauma to the perineal area will subside.
Ann RN
221 Posts
It seems our hospital UTI rate is increasing. So to improve this, ALL nurses must be retaught (I say retaught because didn't we learn this in nursing school?) how to insert a foley. We must be signed off on this. Anyone who has already been signed off can "teach" you, even if that person is a student doing a summer internship. No actions are being taken for physicians. Does this bother anyone?