Published
Something to understand what nurses think about re the Current News and their opinions!
So again, did we not predict this before everyone else?
The NY Times have caught up with us.
I said that this is the best thing that could happen about a week ago maybe. The can of worms through discovery that will be opened, will have the crafters of this legislation wishing that they had never been born!
Being republicans, they are no saints and they are going to wish they were, because their lives are going to be combed through with a finely meshed combed!
And those two idiots who decided to do us all a favor, they are going to be exposed and counter sued by people they have wronged in the past because of their notoriety now, even if they hadn't done anything! Such morons, inserting themselves, when they live in the flimsiest of glass houses!
And think about how many republican politicians that wouldn't be able to resist getting involved or evangelicals!
It's really like the stupid leading the stupid!
15 hours ago, subee said:Having a chemically dependent, screwed up kid has to be awful for any parent. Trump's kids are basically evil except for Eric who is just a defective product. Ivanka insists on conducting her businesses in China and Don, Jr. killed a rare animal who was probabily driven by an employee into direct line of fire so that the rich man's son could go home with a kill. Donald married 3 Barbie Dolls. Biden married an educator.
Right. Could you imagine if Trump's k8ds solicited prostitutes and smoked Crack? Pretty sure it wouldn't be a sad victim to the drug problem. Just another thing to add to their evilness. You have to admit it would be described much differently.
Everyone conducts business in China. Democrats won't even condemn them for Human right violations so there's that.
18 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:Yes. You are trying to downplay the significance of what happened on January 6th by continually conflating the attack on the Capitol and the disruption of the congressional certification of the electoral college vote with other protests that did not intend to, or in fact, disrupt a branch of government. And the other protests were not based in some lie told by a man to explain his election loss...the violent attack on the Capitol was.
Okay. So violence, assault and looting is okay as long as it isn't because of a lie or is done on normal everyday working Americans? Oh but the court houses and police stations taken over by the Antifa Idea... yeah no.
If you had a non bias view and condemned violence from everyone, you might have a better case for your "insurrection". No body buys it really in the other parts of the world. Looks like a joke. Just saying.
22 minutes ago, Cclm said:Okay. So violence, assault and looting is okay as long as it isn't because of a lie or is done on normal everyday working Americans? Oh but the court houses and police stations taken over by the Antifa Idea... yeah no.
If you had a non bias view and condemned violence from everyone, you might have a better case for your "insurrection". No body buys it really in the other parts of the world. Looks like a joke. Just saying.
That's clearly what you want to assign to me but that's not what I believe. The insurrection on January 6 has nothing to do with BLM or antifa. That was all about installing Trump as president after he screwed up the covid response and lost the election.
I also never suggested that I don't have bias. Everyone had bias and prejudice.
You don't speak for every body, certainly not across the world...you aren't well enough informed for that job by a long shot. Before you start speaking for others you have to be able to articulate what they think and, as I've pointed out, you got my thinking so wrong I'm concerned that you aren't really trying to comprehend the comments that I've written for your understanding.
Trump's team knew from an uncovered internal memo that their claims about vote rigging was not true.
Phew!
The dysfunction it must take to know that you are lying and then lie about your lying!
And do you think that the republican party will acknowledge this and try to regain some credibility through an apology?
I'm betting it's deeper down the rabbit hole!
1 minute ago, toomuchbaloney said:That's clearly what you want to assign to me but that's not what I believe. The insurrection on January 6 has nothing to do with BLM or antifa. That was all about installing Trump as president after he screwed up the covid response and lost the election.
I also never suggested that I don't have bias. Everyone had bias and prejudice.
You don't speak for every body, certainly not across the world...you aren't well enough informed for that job by a long shot. Before you start speaking for others you have to be able to articulate what they think and, as I've pointed out, you got my thinking so wrong I'm concerned that you aren't really trying to comprehend the comments that I've written for your understanding.
The first rule for "speaking for others" is to not assume you know what they understand or feel. But by all means discredit what they say by insinuating their understanding of your self assigned superiority.
You've got my thinking so wrong that you really aren't comprehending......Bla bla.
And can you believe that the moronic trump is now suing the NY Times and Mary Trump about his tax exposures!
Really, this man should be flogged publicly for sheer stupidity!
He has the Southern District and Leticia James after him for taxes, so he decides to sue a publication who has his taxes and he doesn't expect them to now respond with articles about his taxes and dribble it out slowly to keep it relevant?
And do you think that discovery doesn't now allow all the parties to communicate and cooperatively take him down?
I can't begin to imagine the level of stupid that trump possesses!
10 minutes ago, Cclm said:The first rule for "speaking for others" is to not assume you know what they understand or feel. But by all means discredit what they say by insinuating their understanding of your self assigned superiority.
You've got my thinking so wrong that you really aren't comprehending......Bla bla.
They didn't say anything...you said something and, like with your attempt to speak about what I believe about antifa or BLM, you portrayed my thoughts and belief completely wrong. I'm not discrediting what others are saying...I'm discrediting what you are saying about me or other people because you are obviously and demonstrably wrong.
I'm mean...how much more obvious could it be...you say that you believe that I think or believe 'blah blah blah' and I tell you that you are wrong. That's pretty clear and simple. Are you trying to contend that you know what I think better than I know?
subee, MSN, CRNA
1 Article; 6,183 Posts
Having a chemically dependent, screwed up kid has to be awful for any parent. Trump's kids are basically evil except for Eric who is just a defective product. Ivanka insists on conducting her businesses in China and Don, Jr. killed a rare animal who was probabily driven by an employee into direct line of fire so that the rich man's son could go home with a kill. Donald married 3 Barbie Dolls. Biden married an educator.