I came across this is little story today, it's not breaking news. I suspect that a member of the housekeeping staff knows something about the bomb threat that required the sweep for weapons.
According to police in Secaucus, the bomb threat — which later was determined to be bogus — was called in to Hudson Regional Hospital on July 18. During a search, bomb detection dogs led investigators to an unlocked office closet containing dozens of firearms.
Among the weapons were 11 handguns and 27 rifles or shotguns, according to police. The closet also contained a .45 caliber semi-automatic rifle with a high-capacity magazine that was determined to be an assault rifle, and a 14-round high-capacity handgun magazine.
The arrested the guy the next day.
What the heck do you think this guy was doing? It sounds very ominous that he was keeping those weapons there.
Let's face it: the ammosexuals in trump's base will take any available opportunity to whip out their big guns and heroically wave them around, secure in the knowledge that trump will leap to their defense (and pay their legal fees, too).
Nah... we're going to call him out right now for those very reckless and dangerous words. Only a naive fool would dismiss the possibility of violence from Trump supporters who are indoctrinated and triggered sufficiently to gather to protest the expected DOJ action. Trump is either dog whistling his violent mob into action or he's too stupid to understand what he's doing with those words.
He shouldn't be calling for public protest over his indictment AT ALL.
Maybe some Antifa style justice will get the NY injustice systems mind right.
Let's face it: the ammosexuals in trump's base will take any available opportunity to whip out their big guns and heroically wave them around, secure in the knowledge that trump will leap to their defense (and pay their legal fees, too).
Awww. You are mad because Trumps "big guns" is bigger than yours?
MaybeeRN said:
Maybe some Antifa style justice will get the NY injustice systems mind right.
No. ANTIFA is just an Idea silly! A firery but not mostly peaceful protest.
Oh and violence is okay as long as you agree with the ideology!
Nah... we're going to call him out right now for those very reckless and dangerous words. Only a naive fool would dismiss the possibility of violence from Trump supporters who are indoctrinated and triggered sufficiently to gather to protest the expected DOJ action. Trump is either dog whistling his violent mob into action or he's too stupid to understand what he's doing with those words.
He shouldn't be calling for public protest over his indictment AT ALL.
Right. Only none conservatives and not Trump, have the constitutional right to protest.
Yes. Anything Trump says is a dog whistle......
Yes calling for protest is incitement to violence. Pleeeeeese.
Let's face it: the ammosexuals in trump's base will take any available opportunity to whip out their big guns and heroically wave them around, secure in the knowledge that trump will leap to their defense (and pay their legal fees, too).
Yet they didn't do it at the Capitol? I guess your vision of events don't square with reality.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
Awww. You are mad because Trumps "big guns" is bigger than yours?
No. ANTIFA is just an Ida silly! A firery but not mostly peaceful protest.
Oh and violence is okay as long as you agree with the ideology!
Is that what this is about? I thought this was about law and order.
I have plenty of guns. No we're not jealous or mad because of the violence prone cult member's weapons.
Do you really think that violence is okay dependent upon the ideology? You seem to be trying hard to make light of the potential for violence now that Trump has asked his followers to assemble again. That makes your comment confusing. Is it an attempt to make a joke rather than consider the history of such remarks from Trump and the actions of his followers? Pretending that Trump's supporters aren't prone to violence would result in a lack of preparedness... you know, like what happened before 010621. Why would anyone ignore that recent history to make light of the current situation?
Maybe it is related to the bias of the media consumed.
Its the totality of the statement that's concerning. NY police have enough issues to deal with, yet alone outsiders coming to protest at courthouse. Best protest = ballot box.
The NY police should focus on the rising violent crime in the city. Not some scary words from Trump. Perhaps ACAB and anti-police graffiti should catch more attention?
We're those quotes meant to prove something? You feel like that's incitement to violence?
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
Right. Only none conservatives and not Trump, have the constitutional right to protest.
Yes. Anything Trump says is a dog whistle......
Yes calling for protest is incitement to violence. Pleeeeeese.
Is hyperbole your only argument here? Is it because you cannot see how reckless and dangerous Trump's call for his angry mob to assemble AGAIN actually is?
Here's the thing... Trump hasn't been notified that he's going to be arrested Tuesday. There's no evidence that's been leaked from the DAs office. Trump is agitating his indoctrinated base.
Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Roitrn said:
The NY police should focus on the rising violent crime in the city. Not some scary words from Trump. Perhaps ACAB and anti-pol8ce graffiti shpuld catch more attention?
We're those quotes meant to prove something? You feel like that's incitement to violence?
Hmmmm. Let's see.
"No retribution" "No justice, no peace".
Trump calls for retribution.
Do you know what retribution means?
Who will exact the retribution?
Who will be the recipient of the retribution?
How is justice related to retribution at the hands of protesters?
Is that what this is about? I thought this was about law and order.
I have plenty of guns. No we're not jealous or mad because of the violence prone cult member's weapons.
Do you really think that violence is okay dependent upon the ideology? You seem to be trying hard to make light of the potential for violence now that Trump has asked his followers to assemble again. That makes your comment confusing. Is it an attempt to make a joke rather than consider the history of such remarks from Trump and the actions of his followers? Pretending that Trump's supporters aren't prone to violence would result in a lack of preparedness... you know, like what happened before 010621. Why would anyone ignore that recent history to make light of the current situation?
Maybe it is related to the bias of the media consumed.
No I do not think violence of any type is okay. Do you?
Do you condem the violence of the 2020 riots? Or nah? You had a hard time condemning the recent anti-police violence in Georga so I highly doubt it.
How about attacks on Pregnacy centre's and threats against Supreme Court justices? Take virtue issue with that? I condem all violence. Including violence against Planned Parenthood because I already know your come back.
Sorry. Perhaps you woukd like it to be only given to certain people? The constitution applied to some, but not all? The right to free speech and the right to protest? Or only that falls under your chosen ideology?
Trump, his supporters, and everyone has the right to both. Even if you don't like them. How totalitarian of you.
None of Trumps comments incite violence and all fall under freedom of speech. So why don't you set out and change the constitution to suite your ideology? Don't take your guns, it may be called an insurrection or domestic terrorism if you do.
Trump has the right to say whatever he wants under the 1st amendment. Even if it causes you emotional upset and gets your feelings bent.
heron, ASN, RN
4,711 Posts
Let's face it: the ammosexuals in trump's base will take any available opportunity to whip out their big guns and heroically wave them around, secure in the knowledge that trump will leap to their defense (and pay their legal fees, too).