Published
no, it's always objective. "subjective" is by definition subject to an individual's feeling or opinion about something. example, "i can't catch my breath" is subjective. "resp rate 24, shallow, insp and exp wheezing" are objective.
"i feel/think i'm pregnant" is subjective. lmp/us/etc. data are objective (weeks by date is different from developmental age, too).
I would have to agree w/ Grn tea - if it is charted that due date is...then weeks gestation would be objective. Esp w/ the US to back it up. Now, if the patient show up at your hospital, lets say she is from out of town, and you cannot verify DOC, you go by what she is telling you, and that is subjective. IMHO
It was my understanding that anything that follows the phrase, "Pt states..." or "Per pt..." is subjective. In my head anyway, LMP is one of those statements. There are lots of reasons why mom might get the date wrong. I am guilty of being approximate when i fill out that question on my health hx forms because i just don't keep track. I am sure i am not the only one. But, i am interested to see what others think about it.
Even if the information is numerical data, such as temp, I think it is still subjective. You cannot be sure that proper technique was used when getting the information. I have spoken to Moms while working front office at a peds clinic that believe the back of their hand is a precise thermometer. They will state their childs temp as 103, 102, 101, based on this.
IMO, the words, "subjective" and "objective" are less-than-optimal when dealing with LMP, movement, enlarging belly, morning sickness, etc.
We should be using, "presumptive", probable" and and "positive". These relate to the signs of pregnancy and take out the objective/subjective part of the equation.
Presumptive: LMP/LNMP, amenorrhea, increased urination, breast changes
Probable: positive urine HCG, ballottment
Positive: FHR detected, fetal movements (as observed by the clinician)
loveoutloud
84 Posts
is weeks gestation subjective or objective data?
thanks!