Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
It's clear to me that leftflank pain and rusti1 (who don't seem to even be RNs) are avid anti-Vaxers here just to push their misinformed, conspiracy-driven, fear-mongering message that all vaccines are evil, and anyone in any way associated with them is just a "big pharma shill".Sadly most anti-Vaxers of this type are so entrenched in their erroneous and quite frankly dangerous anti-science beliefs that it is almost useless to attempt to debate them with facts and science. If you attempt to do so, they will reject all contrary, science-backed info presented simply because in their extremely backward and frightening version of the world, expertise and education mean nothing (and in fact are highly suspect) when weighed against specious anecdotal "evidence" and Google University. They provide perfect real life examples of things like the Dunning-Kruger effect and confirmation bias.
I applaud everyone on this forum who has attempted to educate them - but I definitely don't anticipate anyone here being successful. Knowing that this small yet vocal population is present and growing really scares me as an RN - on both a personal and professional level, given the real threat they and they misguided beliefs pose to me, my loved ones, and public health in general.
rusti1 is not a nurse. You can see her intentions here.
They are????Who knew?
I see what you mean.
I loved Anatomy by the way! I've smelled worse things than the smell of formaldehyde. I even brought my 11 year old son into the lab (with the instructor and the other students' ok) and he got to dissect part of a hand.
Just an example - garbage bags left in the hot sun for days and when you picked them up you found swarms of maggots . . . .
I'll take formaldehyde any day.
Rule #1 is violated with mandatory vaccination
Mandatory vaccination to maintain employment (a choice) is not the same as forced vaccination for a population....
Re: Do you have concerns regarding the natural levels of those chemicals in our bodies through diet and environmental exposures?I don't. Well, it depends. There's a difference between eating an apple with orificenic, and it being isolated and placed in my drink, or injected in my vein. The body processes things naturally when in the correct environment. It would depend on the amount of environmental exposure and how it's exposed to it. Injecting it directly into the body is not natural and there will be and have been bad results.
As amazed as some are that there are questions regarding vaccines, I'm just as if not more amazed at how bad effects from vaccines are mocked and dismissed, and vaccines could be nothing but "harmless" so easily. Of course there now will be "yes buts" regarding the "risk/benefit" and the insistence that others take them based on your "science", as if there is only one "science" and it's yours. There is not one "science" ... that's like saying there's only one "religion" or one "philosophy". There are millions of scientists and many disagree with one another. New "science" is discovered every day. The surprising thing is in this age, after going through world wars fighting tyranny, that such sane, civilized people can be just as tyrannical with their "science" in vaccines. This shouldn't even be a discussion. No one should be forced to take anything against their will or what you believe is "science", that can change on a dime tomorrow. I can assure you, if you or one of your own children were one of the sacrificial lambs, "taking one for the herd", you wouldn't be defending any of it.
Vaccines are not injected intravenously 😃
chevygirl1987
167 Posts
I know that smelling it gives me one extra-special headache. I once took anatomy with cadaver lab and had to wear a respirator (think painting cars) to avoid a puking headache.
I like to tempt fate and still get vaccinated, and eat fruit, and exercise none of those seem to trigger my formaldehyde headache.