Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
Right. Because medicine readily adopts treatment modalities that work. Biological sources have always been a main focus of pharmacological research. You know what they call alternative medicine that works? Medicine.And don't forget, the antibiotic penicillin, DID come from moldy bread. And digitalis DID come from the foxglove plant. And even an anti cancer medication, came from the periwinkle plant. OMG, medications from NATURAL sources? That couldn't be so, now, could it?
And don't forget, the antibiotic penicillin, DID come from moldy bread.
I was being snide when I brought that up. We know this. We all studied microbiology and pharmacology in school.
Still with the non-medical people teaching the medical professionals about medical treatments. Boy did we waste a lot of time and money.
The same whistleblower who made this statement:"
I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits"
Oh snap!
Hi Ixchel...You wrote: Quote from concerned lady: "In third world countries, there is not the reporting system for adverse effects from vaccines, like there is in the United States. So, when babies and children get vaccinated in the 3rd world countries, and some develop autism or die, nobody here in the U.S., who got their free concert tickets, will ever know about those unfortunate babies and children. Sleep well, before your free concert."-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------And then you replied:....Literally not one single child will get autism.Literally.Not one.And if there are any adverse events, I'm absolutely positive the number of lives SAVED will FAR outweigh them.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It sounds like you're trying to be a fortune teller, by predicting that no child could possibly EVER get autism from a vaccine. and then, you back off a bit from that comment by admitting that there could be "adverse events", and I'm glad you admitted that, although you don't believe that autism could possibly be one of those adverse events.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It's fine to believe what you want, but please remember that some people (parents, some doctors, some scientists, etc.) disagree, and their attitudes should ALSO be respected.
Hi Ixchel...You wrote: Quote from concerned lady: "In third world countries, there is not the reporting system for adverse effects from vaccines, like there is in the United States. So, when babies and children get vaccinated in the 3rd world countries, and some develop autism or die, nobody here in the U.S., who got their free concert tickets, will ever know about those unfortunate babies and children. Sleep well, before your free concert."-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------And then you replied:....Literally not one single child will get autism.Literally.Not one.And if there are any adverse events, I'm absolutely positive the number of lives SAVED will FAR outweigh them.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It sounds like you're trying to be a fortune teller, by predicting that no child could possibly EVER get autism from a vaccine. and then, you back off a bit from that comment by admitting that there could be "adverse events", and I'm glad you admitted that, although you don't believe that autism could possibly be one of those adverse events.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It's fine to believe what you want, but please remember that some people (parents, some doctors, some scientists, etc.) disagree, and their attitudes should ALSO be respected.
Your post is almost impossible to read.
You are welcome to believe all you want.
If you tell me 1+1=3, you can believe it's true, but the rest of us know it is not. The debate surrounding vaccines causing autism really is that black and white now. They just don't. Period. There is literally no more debate on this topic.
Sorry, my quote function isn't working, from Rusti1 above"Well, the "flu-like" symptoms were different, and much more intense. Head pounding, body ache, feverish, chills, sniffling, sore throat, cough, and all in a very short time. A cold for me usually starts out with a slight sore throat, sneezing, and head congestion but not going away. Now, I'm interested, let's say according to everyone else here, what I get are all "placebo" symptoms and "placebo" remedies, nothing real about it, I'm not transmitting anything to anyone. Obviously, they can't be real colds or they'd be 7 - 9 Day long, or flu, the same. I only had one "flu-like" incident in 10 years also. So no, not transmitting anything to anyone. Oh, and interestingly, the last time I did have the "real" flu, was two weeks after a Flu Shot 10 years ago. So, that didn't work too well."The duration and severity of cold and symptoms can vary, particularly if you take something shown to reduce the severity or duration such as zinc. But it's not non-pathogenic symptoms that are the problem, it's the opposite; asymptomatic transmission, where a person experiences no obvious symptoms but yet is a vector for the virus. This is why self-quarantine is not a safe way to deal with these pathogens by itself and even when someone does develop symptoms and is relying on cell-mediated immunity they will always be communicable for at least a day before symptoms start. Your ideas are quite fine in addition to a vaccine, but do not in any way replace the protective benefits a vaccine affords to others.
Do I get the flu vaccine? No. Why? Well, a few reasons. About four years ago I worked per diem for a hospital who decided they would fire anyone who refused the vaccine. So for the first time in my life I got the flu vaccine. It was also the first time in my life I had a reaction to something. I have no other allergies but luckily I was at work and was given prompt treatment before it progressed into something worse. I now refuse to get the vaccine even though they say "oh, you'll be fine". lolol. Right..... Last year of all the NPs who work for my company, I was one of two who did not get vaccinated. Only the two of us never missed a day of work and only the two of us did not get the flu. Mind you, we have almost 50 NPs on staff. I have all my other vaccines and I am definitely a proponent of vaccines. However, I think the flu vaccine is a big money making scheme that is fueled by fear and propaganda. It's literally a shot in the dark in terms of what strains they choose. Then we're supposed to tell patients that even if they get the flu, it will be less severe. Please...most of the patients I treat for flu have had the vaccine. My advice to patients is: eat well, exercise, take vitamin D3 and probiotics. Stop using hand sanitizer and Lysol and all that crap. We're turning into a bunch of sissies with immune systems that can't withstand anything.
From Concerned Lady:"Dear JustBeachyNurse: I would rather see all children LIVE, and my point is, that in a democracy such as the U.S. supposedly is, there should not be totalitarian FORCING of vaccines or any medications. Let parents make the decision to vaccinate or not to vaccinate. Don't close your ears to the confessions of the CDC whistleblower, just because you just can't believe that he might now be telling the truth, that there IS data that was covered up and destroyed, that showed a connection between certain vaccines, and autism."That's like arguing that in a free country murder shouldn't be illegal since that is forcing a belief onto someone. Freedom includes the right to be free from being subject to harm as a result of somebody's else's desire to sacrifice you in the name of misdirected anti-corporatism.And there was no data that was covered up destroyed that showed a connection between certain vaccines and autism. In the study in question, the data for some children was excluded because they lacked birth certificates, which was pretty important since the whole study revolved around the exact of the children when they received vaccines. A "re-analysis" by Hooker et all was published (then later retracted with an apology for publishing such overtly flawed hogwash) which suggested the excluded data showed an increase in autism rates, although when examined by people with actual math and statistical training the results could not be reproduced. So no, there was no cover up: A bad day for antivaccinationists: A possible retraction, and the CDC whistleblower†William W. Thompson issues a statement – Respectful Insolence
cayenne06, MSN, CNM
1,394 Posts