Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?
Updated:
First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:
I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?
Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.
Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.
Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.
Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.
Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.
I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:
Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.
(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)
The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.
Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.
You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.
Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.
Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.
Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.
Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.
All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.
Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:
References
American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel
ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7
CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC
Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u
National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit
NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf
TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf
Hey wait a minute! This is not a peer to peer discussion, but rather a nurse vs anti-vaxxer debate.
From rusti1's entry on the why i came to an thread:
"I came to allnurses through a search link regarding vaccinations. I am not a nurse however. I am into natural remedies, vitamins and organic whole foods, but, I was happy to see allnurses does not endorse all vaccinations and used the reference in another forum. I joined to see other health advice and information."
You are right. It is outrageous. Strange how people turn a blind eye to that.Macawake's post was amazing and yes, it is heartbreakingly sad to see what kinds of baloney pucky miracle cures people fall for.
We use blackstrap molasses on the corns, oats, and barley for my son's 4-H sheep. It was pretty funny to read about it being a miracle cure.
Well, Steph at least your sheep won't die from CA.
Hey wait a minute! This is not a peer to peer discussion, but rather a nurse vs anti-vaxxer debate.From rusti1's entry on the why i came to an thread:
"I came to allnurses through a search link regarding vaccinations. I am not a nurse however. I am into natural remedies, vitamins and organic whole foods, but, I was happy to see allnurses does not endorse all vaccinations and used the reference in another forum. I joined to see other health advice and information."
Such a mob mentality. Nurses are quick to support scientific claims because it makes them feel more intelligent by association. I have lived long enough to know that science is indeed flawed, and often produces "evidence" that is later refuted.
1)__ Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
Yes
2)__ Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
No but the county I work in does for all healthcare workers and leave hospitals and other health facilities to do the vaccines and paperwork
3)__ What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
I've never had a reaction to any vaccine except the expected known signs and symptoms of the inflammatory response.
4)__ Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?
Just one who refused the shot - then refused the mask on grounds she was claustrophobic
Re: Quote from cayenne06:Cancer patients are frequently swindled into spending thousands and thousands of dollars on ineffective or potentially harmful "natural" cancer remedies. It's very sad
Actually, I believe most turn to natural remedies only after they've done the cut, chemo and radiation. How much do they cost? One man spent literally pennies on baking soda and molasses, and it worked for him, so, I find it funny when the "cost" is a concern.
Even a stopped clock will tell the correct time twice a day. If it's such a miracle cure, why aren't there peer reviewed studies regarding it?
:) Ok, well, maybe there is illogical thinking in some ...like eating pounds of seeds and not hydrating. And, there are no efficacy rates because there is no official central holistic authority to report them to. I've taken vitamin C for years for colds, flu and asthma, but conventional science still denies it no matter how many times I "report" it, so people are left to find things out for themselves. It then ends up that people learn to "doctor" themselves. I don't believe a coffee enema is that dangerous, so putting "fear" in everything tried apart from conventional say so is what's disturbing to me. Maybe you're not, but, that's how it does come off, assuming everything natural is "psuedoscience" for one, or not within the conventional perimeter of being legitimate. The conventional treatments fall short on many things, I would say add to health problems, but, that's my general opinion and view too. So for them to take "authority" as to what's health and what isn't is well, funny to me.
Are you a nurse? I hope not, because a nurse should know that a coffee enema could be deadly in a cancer patient, esp. if that cancer pt has low platelets, is neutropenic, and/or is anemic.
Do you need someone to explain the complications this sort of enema can cause?
Such a mob mentality. Nurses are quick to support scientific claims because it makes them feel more intelligent by association. I have lived long enough to know that science is indeed flawed, and often produces "evidence" that is later refuted.
Nurses come to the site "allnurses" expecting to talk to other nurses, hence the same "allnurses." We get plenty of exposure talking to the lay public about medical matters. This site, for many, is a haven from dealing with those individuals.
Oh well...it was a nice idea.
One of my favorite actors, Jerry Orbach, died from prostate caner. What a shame...if only he'd had some molasses and Arm and Hammer.
There is actually a clinical trial right now using sodium bicarb as an adjunct pain reliever in cancer patients. Sadly, the preliminary estimates show that a dose of sodium bicarb that would be therapeutic would also likely be fatal.
Doesn't the idea of baking soda go back to a historical idea that cancer was related to a fungus. I think that ship has sailed. Around the world. Millions of times.
trinitymaster
360 Posts
So, in summary:
1. I will get the flu shot. Mainly because I can't breathe with the Mask on.
2. The shot is not for my protection, but rather for the weaker members of the herd.
3. It is apparently okay to use words such as "ignorant" and "stupid" in reference to alternative ideas.
4. Vax-choice advocates generally have little scientific evidence to back up their claims.
5. Vax-all advocates have flawed scientific evidence filled with bias and confounding variables that cannot be controlled for.
6. Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.
7. They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.