Published
Wow, this is very hard to take in. I was just fired for something that I didn't even know I did wrong. I used my nursing judgement in Friday when a patient did something and I wrote a note about it. I even checked with 2 other nurses (sitting at the desk with me) to make sure a general note was adequate not an "expanded note" and they said that's all they would do too.
In any case it's the "termination process" that's killing me here. I was advised by a supervisor over the weekend to check in with someone from administration to review my "file" on Monday. Monday morning I get a phone call from another supervisor about Fridays incident, I explained in full detail. On my way in on Monday I get another phone call about Fridays "incident," I explain in full detail, said that it's all in my note and asked if I had anything to worry about. We arranged to meet Wednesday. I told her I was on my way in then anyway, she said not necessary.
I went in to review my file. My DON saw me, glared and went into her office. I went to see an administraitor I had a good connection with and told her that I wanted to sit down with her and review my file in private. We ran around for 10 minutes until I was told that the DON was ready to see me. I said that I wasn't here to see her and we were meeting Wednesday. Didn't seem to matter.
I went in. DON at her desk. Supervisor who called me at a table taking notes. They told me that I was suspended and I wasnt supposed to be there. Nobody had told me I was suspended before this. We had only aggreed to meet on Wednesday. They asked me to explain Fridays events where I did nothing wrong. I explained. I was criticized. I defended. They yelled. I started sweating, shaking and told theme that I had only come in to see my file. I left the office.
I was pulled into HR. They showed me my file. HR went to see my DON. The administrator I "trusted" came in to see me. I tried talking to her about my write ups to understand them because I didn't and then she started asking me about my wedding, insisting we lighten the mood and talk about that instead.
HR returned and said I needed to go back to the DON's office. DON, Suservisor, HR and me. I was told that I broke policy. I asked what one and if I could see it, they said no. I asked HR to advocate for me, she said that she has to advocate for everyone in the room, including the DON and Supervisor. I was handed a paper that said I was terminated. I told them I did what I was trained to do, they need to re-educate the people who trained me. They said this isn't about them, this is about you. I got up and walked out. HR followed my yelling "I'm going to need your badge!" I tried to step into an office she said " you can't go in there!" Then "don't forget to bring back your badge!"
I don't know I'm mixed up. I was looking for other employment and I'm about 90% sure I have another job. But this termination process seems very weird. I have felt like my head had been on a chopping block for weeks and I think they were looking for anything to kick me out. Should I do anything about this? If so, what?
Here is a tip to ANYONE reading this comment:If you feel that you have one foot out the door and you are asked to come in and meet with the manager/director/administrator/head honcho, or whatever about an incident (directly related to you), say "I will need to check my schedule. I'll contact you." Then, send a resignation letter in writing, via email, pronto.
Don't give them that chance to say in writing that "we met with so-and-so, and warn so-and-so, and so-and-so's performance is below average, blah, blah blah." Otherwise, the writing goes on your record and you will be blocked from going to another unit at the hospital, even though their accusations are as weak as sin.
Again, don't meet with them. By resigning without a meeting, any negative evaluation post-resignation would look retaliation.
Plus, resigning > termination. With a termination, you have to report the job.
Except sometimes that may lead to a resignation for something that might not have led to termination.
Once, I had an event that could have led to termination for two employees. We met separately with each one, then suspended them pending further investigation. They knew they could be fired, but we decided on 3 day unpaid suspension and a final warning.
If someone resigns preemptively, they can still be listed as a do not rehire, either due to the incident or due to quitting without notice.
Except sometimes that may lead to a resignation for something that might not have led to termination.Once, I had an event that could have led to termination for two employees. We met separately with each one, then suspended them pending further investigation. They knew they could be fired, but we decided on 3 day unpaid suspension and a final warning.
If someone resigns preemptively, they can still be listed as a do not rehire, either due to the incident or due to quitting without notice.
Yeah, but it will let to avoid black mark of "termination" anyway. And everyone knows nowadays that "not eligible to rehire" alone means close to nothing in our days of "right to work".
After everything that was done with me, I would never in my life go to such a meeting alone, whatever HR and the Powers say or promice. Depending on situation, there would be either my resignation note, or my legal team, or both.
And it is like 110% probability that by marking otherwise good nurses "not to rehire" not for serious stuff like playing games with narcs or near-misses and sentinel events but for a silly cattiness and politicking, you will eventually lose much more good and experienced nurses that just those you unceremoniously discharged. People tend to communicate, and people who feel bad tend to let others know much more than those who are happy. Think about it next time when you start offering nurses $$$ for recruiting their friends
Without knowing what happened, I don't know if it was a fireable offence. Fireable offences are usually something that puts them at liability, or great damage was done. an example might be if the patient said she was going to kill somebody, and then assaulted the DON the next morning. It's also possible it was a witch hunt. If it was, your friend the administrator might have been giving you nonverbal cues that they felt it was unjust.
Many places don't want to give anything more than NRS (name rank serial number) when a prospective employer calls. Dates worked and that's about it. They aren't being paid for this and have better ways to spend their time, unless they thought you were deliberately killing patients.
Sometimes it can be a plus in an interview if you disclose the termination very carefully, not in too much detail. If you admit you erred, and have learned the error of your ways, you may be making yourself 'human' (very important in an interview), showing that you are humble, teachable, and responsible. More than any letter of reference can. just MHO.
Buyer beware, BSN
1,139 Posts
Yes. HR IS the institution. They are NOT on your side. You are right about the bus. You are right about never getting to see your accuser. You are correct about not being treated like an adult.
The one assertion that you make which may be wishful thinking is that institutions need nurses.
Since nursing care is the number one sunk investment of any healthcare facility, the relationship between the suits and the people who actually do the work is tenuous. More like love/hate than anything else.
And then there's the flood of passionate nursing graduates.
As far as the original posters c/o the rug being pulled from under him/her, it's hard to give an informed opinion based on no information other than to say "so what else is new?"