RaDonda Vaught is seeking reinstatement of her Tennessee (TN) nursing license after a fatal medication error in 2017.
Updated:
TN state nursing board's 2021 decision to revoke her nursing license will be appealed in court on Tuesday, March 28. If the appeal is successful, she will face a retrial before the Tennessee Board of Nursing.
Nursing boards generally make decisions regarding the reinstatement of nursing licenses based on various factors, including the nature and severity of an offense, the rehabilitation efforts of the individual, and their ability to practice nursing safely and competently.
If RaDonda Vaught has completed the requirements (if any) and demonstrated that she could meet the standards of safe and competent nursing practice, then it may be possible for her to have her RN license reinstated. However, this decision ultimately rests with the state nursing board.
Most of us recall the RaDonda Vaught case in 2017 because it involved a fatal medication error, and she was charged with reckless homicide for the mistake. The decision to prosecute her made history because it set a precedent for criminalizing medical errors.
On December 26, 2017, RaDonda Vaught, a 35-year-old RN, worked as a "help-all" nurse at the Nashville, Tennessee-based Vanderbilt University Medical Center. She was sent to Radiology Services to administer VERSED (midazolam) to Charlene Murphey, a 75-year-old woman recovering from a brain injury and scheduled for a PET scan.
Charlene Murphey was experiencing anxiety, and her provider ordered Versed, a sedative, to help her through the procedure. RaDonda entered the letters "ve" for Versed (the brand name) in the automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) search field.
No matches populated the screen under the patient's profile, so RaDonda used the ADC override function and again entered "ve," this time mistakenly selecting vecuronium.
Vecuronium is a neuromuscular blocking agent, and patients must be mechanically ventilated when administered vecuronium. RaDonda reconstituted the drug and administered what she thought was one mg of Versed.
Unaware of her mistake, RaDonda left the patient unmonitored and went on to her next help-all assignment in the ED to conduct a swallow test.
Charlene Murphey was discovered about 30 minutes later by a transporter who noticed she wasn't breathing. She had sustained an unwitnessed respiratory arrest and was pulseless. She was coded, intubated, and taken back to ICU but was brain-dead and died within twelve hours.
Legal System
On February 4th, 2019, RaDonda was indicted and arrested on charges of reckless criminal homicide and impaired adult abuse.
On May 13, 2022, she was found guilty of criminally negligent homicide and gross neglect of an impaired adult, and sentenced to 3 years of supervised probation.
Board of Nursing
On September 27, 2019, the TN Department of Health (Nursing Board) reversed its previous decision not to pursue discipline against the nurse and charged RaDonda Vaught with:
On July 23, 2021, at the BON disciplinary trial, the Tennessee (TN) Board of Nursing revoked RaDonda Vaught's professional nursing license indefinitely, fined her $3,000, and stipulated that she pay up to $60,000 in prosecution costs.
Many opposed RaDonda Vaught being charged with a crime, including the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN), the Institute of Safe Medicine Practice (ISMP), and the American Nurses Association (ANA).
If nurses fear reporting their errors for fear of criminal charges, it discourages ethical principles of honesty.
But should RaDonda be allowed to practice nursing again?
The (ISMP) felt strongly that revoking her license was a travesty and that the severity of the outcome wrongly influenced the decision. Contributing system errors were minimized, and RaDonda Vaught became the scapegoat, while Vanderbilt escaped full notoriety.
The ISMP said RaDonda displayed human error and at-risk behaviors but not reckless behavior. She did not act with evil intent and is a second victim of a fatal error. In a Just Culture, discipline is not meted out for human error.
Do you think RaDonda Vaught should be allowed to practice nursing again, and why or why not?
Thank you for your thoughts!
Tommy5677 said:It doesn't matter because no one will hire her anyway. It's all moot. I never said she should return to any hands on clinical area. There are nonclinical things she can do that require a RN but people here don't even want her doing that. I think there was some kind of motive here with this post to get people's dander up and it has succeeded.
The motive might involve not wanting criminally negligent nurses in the work force. Do you trust RV to follow policy, procedure, simple safety guidance or even to read those things before making terrible decisions? If so, why?
Is your dander up? Is that why you pm'd me telling me that you didn't expect to hear further from me?
Tommy5677 said:... I am sure you are all familiar with the case of Dr. Cook who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter when he was drunk driving and killed a 20 year old woman. He was able to leave prison, work in healthcare and go home to see his family on weekends. ...
Yes, he worked for a pharmaceutical company during his work release, not as a physician, as he surrendered his medical license not long after he struck and killed Ms. Shapiro.
As for his work release. He was allowed one 48 hour and two 6 hour leave periods monthly. Interestingly enough, the Wake County, NC assistant district attorney, who I believed prosecuted Dr. Cook, found this to be perplexing, as did Ms. Shapiro's father.
Tommy5677 said:It doesn't matter because no one will hire her anyway.
I wouldn't bet money on that. There are many who haven't bothered to read the investigations and statements. They believe that she was wronged by Vandy, an innocent bystander treated unjustly. Someone like that will hire her
klone said:What does this even mean?
also, most of us do not live in Tennessee. Tenebrae is posting from Australia (I believe). Just because you're in Maine does not mean you don't have access to the facts of the case. I encourage you to learn them before arguing things that are factually inaccurate.
Wow! I simply posted on what All Nurses presented in its email to me...and clearly said so.
toomuchbaloney said:Nurses willing to make excuses for criminally negligent behavior are more than tiresome, they are worrisome.
And frightening! We are all people , with families and friends....knowing someone could continue to work as a nurse after such a life-altering episode of terrible clinical judgement is scary. There are several ways this could have been avoided and one huge one for me is the simple fact Versed does NOT need to be reconstitued, Vecuronium DOES. She REALLY should have noticed that...it seems like Versed is a drug she is probably pretty familiar with. Not to mention, when someone makes an error of this magnitude or any that attract a lot of news/media it affects all of us. The public see us all in a different light.
Wuzzie said:First, you weren't clear with what you meant by "AllNurses's Query" as that is not a term used around here so we had absolutely no idea you were basing your opinion on email blurbs of information. Also, you weren't being ignored. What you were saying was just wrong and you weren't willing to listen to those of us who actually have read the documents. You really should read them. They're eye opening. I know for many of us it was a wake up call to pay attention to our practice in all areas.
I never disagreed with anyone. I simply said the information I received was not enough to base a decision upon.
Hoosier_RN said:
klone said:What does this even mean?
also, most of us do not live in Tennessee. Tenebrae is posting from Australia (I believe). Just because you're in Maine does not mean you don't have access to the facts of the case. I encourage you to learn them before arguing things that are factually inaccurate.
Not where I practiced ...from Maine to Florida...if over-ride was necessary, one picked up the phone, called pharmacy, and did it together.
QuoteNurses wanting to be judge and jury is just tiresome.
I don't think anyone here is trying to be "judge and jury", we are, however trained professionals who are working/ have worked in the field discussing and debating an egregious error made by a fellow RN. Different eyes/ ears/ experiences who are each shedding our own personal perspective regarding an event that does even remotely affect us. After this case hit the news the public started seeing nurses in a different light. You could see it the comments under the plethora of articles that have been published. It's human nature....ie it happened once so it could happen to ME.
We, as nurses have every right and even obligation to debate this, we can all help each other and we can teach each other.
toomuchbaloney
16,109 Posts
Oh you can disagree all you want...